Luke Mitchell Theories

[William Wallace]

Why would the discovery of blood a short distance from where the body was found have been so incriminating towards the murderer that they felt compelled to return to the scene days later to bleach the area?

Bleaching is done by poachers/illegal hunters to avoid detection and confuse the authorities. The area where the animal is illegally killed is bleached, the blood cannot be found by dogs, so the place of death remains unknown once the dead animal is moved. The same method can be used to hide where a human was killed. No blood where Jodi was found - it doesn't take Columbo to work out if there's no blood the person didn't die there.

[William Wallace]

WW, have you seen the CM/SM transcripts and LM's police statement and been able to apply the same scrutiny? For me, I think it was crucial for the jury to hear that all 3 Mitchell's had different accounts of where he was between 5-6pm and jury ultimately couldn't believe any of them which decided his fate.

Yes I've read them all. Their statements are bizarre and none confirm that LM was certainly in the house which definitely was damaging as you say. The problem is, multiple other people's whereabouts were not confirmed either, but only Mitchell was treated as a suspect. Nobody investigated where MK was between 5 and 6pm, or where "he who cannot be named " was either. Ju J claimed he was in the house, but he was seen at 445pm following Jodi along the road. After the murder Police said only JuJ and AO were in the house at 130am. They didn't check if anyone else was in the house. Hence, nobody knows if X was in or not. The question is, who would be in BED if their 14 year old sister was missing? If we all try to be impartial, the reality is NOBODY would be in bed if their 14 year old sister had been missing for over 7 hours, so I think it's extremely unlikely to say the least that he was in that house at all.

[William Wallace]

Yet you argue your killer, who was supposedly almost comatose due to drug use, was able to inflict such intricate injuries and escape unseen? Are you aware what kind of knots the killer used? You've been on whatever SL/SF are on.

Nobody mentioned drugs. Certain people were known to have not taken their medication or attended appointments at times. Any person suffering from paranoia and delusions can stop taking medications any time they want to.

[Parky41]

Nothing Jodi's mum did that day contributed towards her daughter's death. Victim blaming at it's finest. You sound like one of the people relentlessly posting pictures of the Jones' and extended family on social media for Police Scotland to investigate because it's just not fair.

How very sad Kenmair and reeking of desperation as all liars do. Let's have a look at this regurgitated nonsense.

They are saying, via proven liars, that the lad cancelled a doctors appointment on the 30th of June. How awful. That his "usual excuse" was given for doing so. OK, so nothing out of the ordinary from what they are claiming anyway. Any cancellation that day was no different to any other time, pretty much the norm. 

Am I missing something here? A grown male wanted his appointment cancelled, his choice to do so. We have no idea what this "usual excuse" was or if any of it is actually true? But it is applied that the mother lied, how can we determine a lie when we don't know what was said? Have these puppets of the enablers ever attempted to be shown proof? - Ah, that is correct, they can't be shown proof they are told, because it is unlawful to do so. So, and as has been said many times, like Faith, they apply blind faith, because 'the enablers have access no one else has had' - What a s**t show that has turned out to be!

So, it didn't take long before Faith jumped back into action again, repeating and regurgitating stuff from proven liars. Where we are seeing repeatedly just now, how they have taken a fragment of truth, built it into many lies, because there really are inept people out there just soaking it all up!

Ah, nearly forgot, the claimed "mental health team" warned the mother about cannabis but the mother hid it from the claimed "mental health team?" Now how does that work exactly? - It really is not difficult at all to see right through that type of BS.

Now, I do wonder where those fragments of truth are with the brother - For you can bet your bottom dollar that anything to do with him, the truth, is but a walk in the park compared to the fairy stories in place.

[William Wallace]

Why was MK even a suspect in the first place? Only on the word of SF who tried to set him up for a media payout scoop claiming MK had multiple scratches etc yet MK claimed he only had a minute scratch and SF had bullied him. Yes MK was interviewed and eliminated after the trial.

Joe was certainly interviewed at the time. Unless he was in hospital between the date of the murder until the trial there is no law to say he could not be spoken to. You are singing from Forbes hymnsheet which is worrying.

The media made up the payout story. Nobody has ever provided proof that it happened, including the "journalist" who wrote it.

I'm not going to go into things about "he who cannot be named" as it can lead to warnings and red cards in here. All I will say about it is that what you have stated above is not correct.

[Parky41]

Why was MK even a suspect in the first place? Only on the word of SF who tried to set him up for a media payout scoop claiming MK had multiple scratches etc yet MK claimed he only had a minute scratch and SF had bullied him. Yes MK was interviewed and eliminated after the trial.

Joe was certainly interviewed at the time. Unless he was in hospital between the date of the murder until the trial there is no law to say he could not be spoken to. You are singing from Forbes hymnsheet which is worrying.

He certainly was spoken to, there was NO, he could not be spoken to, nothing at all under any mental health act/problems. Which in itself speaks volumes! The lie used to be no statements were taken, to then claiming to be reciting from them! The latest is there were many statements, but the chief enabler claims they were different looking from others ! - Ah, that damn conspiracy she feeds to the inept!

Reality, and again how to spot the BS. LW was excused on mental health grounds, she did not have to testify at court. The brother had many statements taken, none were used of his, why? Three people present in the house when the victim left, only two were needed. Her mother and naturally so for several reasons, AO's because they were using his timings, the CCTV and so forth. No need for the brothers presence, no need for evidence from his. For, if it were anything to do with mental health grounds, anything they needed would have been used, just like LW! - It really is that simple.

WW enough with the regurgitation of utter nonsense, from and again - Proven liars!

[faithlilly]

Nothing Jodi's mum did that day contributed towards her daughter's death. Victim blaming at it's finest. You sound like one of the people relentlessly posting pictures of the Jones' and extended family on social media for Police Scotland to investigate because it's just not fair.

Again I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy.

Both mothers were the only people who were able to give their sons an alibi. You contend that Corrine was dishonest  and the tattoo business was a case in point. I am simply pointing out that Judith was quite willing to lie for her son again and again….’the usual excuse’….even when that dishonesty put both her son and people around him in danger and please don’t try to excuse the lie by claiming that she told the police herself what she’d done. She had no choice as the police would have found out anyway.

[faithlilly]

How very sad Kenmair and reeking of desperation as all liars do. Let's have a look at this regurgitated nonsense.

They are saying, via proven liars, that the lad cancelled a doctors appointment on the 30th of June. How awful. That his "usual excuse" was given for doing so. OK, so nothing out of the ordinary from what they are claiming anyway. Any cancellation that day was no different to any other time, pretty much the norm. 

Am I missing something here? A grown male wanted his appointment cancelled, his choice to do so. We have no idea what this "usual excuse" was or if any of it is actually true? But it is applied that the mother lied, how can we determine a lie when we don't know what was said? Have these puppets of the enablers ever attempted to be shown proof? - Ah, that is correct, they can't be shown proof they are told, because it is unlawful to do so. So, and as has been said many times, like Faith, they apply blind faith, because 'the enablers have access no one else has had' - What a s**t show that has turned out to be!

So, it didn't take long before Faith jumped back into action again, repeating and regurgitating stuff from proven liars. Where we are seeing repeatedly just now, how they have taken a fragment of truth, built it into many lies, because there really are inept people out there just soaking it all up!

Ah, nearly forgot, the claimed "mental health team" warned the mother about cannabis but the mother hid it from the claimed "mental health team?" Now how does that work exactly? - It really is not difficult at all to see right through that type of BS.

Now, I do wonder where those fragments of truth are with the brother - For you can bet your bottom dollar that anything to do with him, the truth, is but a walk in the park compared to the fairy stories in place.

The ‘mental health team’ warned the mother that cannabis use would exacerbate her son’s paranoia and psychosis. The mother hid it from ‘the mental health team’ that her son was using that afternoon. What the ‘usual excuse’ was isn’t important. The fact that his mother had obviously lied for him before is. You see, all perfectly logical.

[faithlilly]

He certainly was spoken to, there was NO, he could not be spoken to, nothing at all under any mental health act/problems. Which in itself speaks volumes! The lie used to be no statements were taken, to then claiming to be reciting from them! The latest is there were many statements, but the chief enabler claims they were different looking from others ! - Ah, that damn conspiracy she feeds to the inept!

Reality, and again how to spot the BS. LW was excused on mental health grounds, she did not have to testify at court. The brother had many statements taken, none were used of his, why? Three people present in the house when the victim left, only two were needed. Her mother and naturally so for several reasons, AO's because they were using his timings, the CCTV and so forth. No need for the brothers presence, no need for evidence from his. For, if it were anything to do with mental health grounds, anything they needed would have been used, just like LW! - It really is that simple.

WW enough with the regurgitation of utter nonsense, from and again - Proven liars!

Should they rather listen to you….the individual why brought us the ‘strong verdict’ then backed away from the claim rather speedily when it was proved he was propagating false information. Or the individual who brought us the tale of the photograph of Luke in a parka at a concert before the murder. A claim that there is not one smidgen of evidence for?

Hmmm…hard choice!

[KenMair]

The ‘mental health team’ warned the mother that cannabis use would exacerbate her son’s paranoia and psychosis. The mother hid it from ‘the mental health team’ that her son was using that afternoon. What the ‘usual excuse’ was isn’t important. The fact that his mother had obviously lied for him before is. You see, all perfectly logical.

Another one that doesn't know what they're talking about. Even if Mrs J was a Named Person under the MH Act she wouldn't have a final say in Joe's treatment. Perfectly logical only in the minds of conspiracy theorists but you'll know best as usual.

[faithlilly]

Another one that doesn't know what they're talking about. Even if Mrs J was a Named Person under the MH Act she wouldn't have a final say in Joe's treatment. Perfectly logical only in the minds of conspiracy theorists but you'll know best as usual.

I don’t think I suggested that she would.

[KenMair]

Should they rather listen to you….the individual why brought us the ‘strong verdict’ then backed away from the claim rather speedily when it was proved he was propagating false information. Or the individual who brought us the tale of the photograph of Luke in a parka at a concert before the murder. A claim that there is not one smidgen of evidence for?

Hmmm…hard choice!

And yet there were at least 8 people who testified in court that LM had a parka. The more this sordid tale goes on it becomes a case of a few people picking away at the most irrelevant of details.

[Parky41]

How very sad Kenmair and reeking of desperation as all liars do. Let's have a look at this regurgitated nonsense.

They are saying, via proven liars, that the lad cancelled a doctors appointment on the 30th of June. How awful. That his "usual excuse" was given for doing so. OK, so nothing out of the ordinary from what they are claiming anyway. Any cancellation that day was no different to any other time, pretty much the norm. 

Am I missing something here? A grown male wanted his appointment cancelled, his choice to do so. We have no idea what this "usual excuse" was or if any of it is actually true? But it is applied that the mother lied, how can we determine a lie when we don't know what was said? Have these puppets of the enablers ever attempted to be shown proof? - Ah, that is correct, they can't be shown proof they are told, because it is unlawful to do so. So, and as has been said many times, like Faith, they apply blind faith, because 'the enablers have access no one else has had' - What a s**t show that has turned out to be!

So, it didn't take long before Faith jumped back into action again, repeating and regurgitating stuff from proven liars. Where we are seeing repeatedly just now, how they have taken a fragment of truth, built it into many lies, because there really are inept people out there just soaking it all up!

Ah, nearly forgot, the claimed "mental health team" warned the mother about cannabis but the mother hid it from the claimed "mental health team?" Now how does that work exactly? - It really is not difficult at all to see right through that type of BS.

Now, I do wonder where those fragments of truth are with the brother - For you can bet your bottom dollar that anything to do with him, the truth, is but a walk in the park compared to the fairy stories in place.

Point proven Kenmair - In they jump an instantly lie. Such is the way, it is a compulsion. All intentional of course. But it is as the ego says, 'a lie is still a lie' - Hilarious, isn't it just. [Name removed]'s had a rock solid alibi, that is the difference. There were no two mothers, there was a mother and her partner. The good thing about telling the truth, is you are not caught out!. Like being "caught" on CCTV as opposed to being seen where you said you were. Like all compulsive liars, the really do have an abhorrent dislike for honest people.

It is as Mr Fibs said/asked recently 'Would you lie if it meant keeping your innocent son out of prison?' Isn't it understandable that CM lied, she was only trying to protect her 'innocent' son!

[faithlilly]

Point proven Kenmair - In they jump an instantly lie. Such is the way, it is a compulsion. All intentional of course. But it is as the ego says, 'a lie is still a lie' - Hilarious, isn't it just. [Name removed]'s had a rock solid alibi, that is the difference. There were no two mothers, there was a mother and her partner. The good thing about telling the truth, is you are not caught out!. Like being "caught" on CCTV as opposed to being seen where you said you were. Like all compulsive liars, the really do have an abhorrent dislike for honest people.

It is as Mr Fibs said/asked recently 'Would you lie if it meant keeping your innocent son out of prison?' Isn't it understandable that CM lied, she was only trying to protect her 'innocent' son!

Okay…there was a mother and her son. Was Ovens ever asked directly whether Joseph was in the house at the time of Jodi’s murder? No rock solid alibi for Joseph I’m afraid but you know that, don’t you?

Your incessant propaganda is become all rather familiar. Paint everyone else as liars and only you, and people who fall for your nonsense, truthful. A dislike for honest people…on the contrary. In this den of deceit they’d be like a breath of fresh air.

[faithlilly]

And yet there were at least 8 people who testified in court that LM had a parka. The more this sordid tale goes on it becomes a case of a few people picking away at the most irrelevant of details.

Yet not one photograph of him wearing it.