Author Topic: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views  (Read 213598 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1050 on: December 16, 2019, 12:05:01 PM »
It’s started

In response to Lithium

Simon Hall admitted his guilt and subsequently took his own life over it, and Sandra still refuses to admit she was wrong.”

Sandra Lean states here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452332.html#msg452332
Wrong again! The details of the confession were never made public. It was never revealed whether Simon Hall had legal representation when making the confession. It was never revealed whether he had been assessed by a psychiatrist or psychologist or what his mental state was in the lead up to the confession - was he in sound mind, fully aware of what he was saying/doing? I can see no reason why those details were not publicly known -- they should have been, in order to confirm that the confession actually fitted the details of the crime and that he was not, for example, suffering some sort of mental breakdown and just saying anything.

Once again, I'm searching for the truth. If the confession contains details that all fit with the crime and it can be shown that he was in sound mind and was fully aware of what he was saying and doing, then it would be reasonable to accept that he did, in fact, commit the murder and managed to conceal that fact for all those years, aided by a bungled police investigation which brought a case lacking the necessary elements of proof (even Keir Starmer admitted that, without the fibre evidence, "the case disappears.")


The above by Sandra Lean has been moved and can now be found here http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg452332.html#msg452332
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1051 on: November 26, 2020, 03:02:07 PM »
Anyone know what happened to the long road to justice?

http://longroadtojustice.com/blurb/


Sandra lean
Today, my book about the case, Innocents Betrayed, was launched. Profits from the book are being donated to help fund a new organisation, Long Road to Justice, which will be taking a radically new approach to helping the fight against injustice.

Details of the book can be found here:

www.longroadtojustice.com
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448049.html#msg448049

Interestingly one of Sandra Lean’s twitter accounts @LongRdtoJustice here https://mobile.twitter.com/LongRdtoJustice/with_replies

LongRoadtoJustice
@LongRdtoJustice
·
Oct 26, 2018
Launching today, my new book #InnocentsBetrayed – the truth about the conviction of Luke Mitchell for the murder of Jodi Jones. Profits from the book to help set up a new organisation #LongRoadtoJustice to help the fight against injustice in this country.
http://longroadtojustice.com

Was ‘following’ 3 and had 1 ‘follower’

The 1 ‘follower’ was Michelle Nicolson a convicted murderer - found guilty of killing her father Keith Nicolson

The facts of the case were as follows. The deceased Keith Nicholson was the father of the applicant. He was addicted to drugs and alcohol. His son (the applicant’s brother) under the influence of his father had himself abused and become addicted to drugs. The trial judge was of the view that the motive for the murder was a desire by the applicant to remove the deceased as a bad influence on his son. The applicant initiated the idea of killing her father. She recruited her co-defendant Smethurst who co-operated in the planning of the offence and in the killing itself. At the time of these events he was infatuated with her.

4. In accordance with the plan made by the two defendants, they drove the victim to the North Yorkshire moors, knocked him unconscious with a pickaxe handle, and set him alight with petrol. The applicant’s defence was that, despite her admitted presence at the time of the offence, she took no part in it, and/or was suffering from acute stress disorder. The partial defences of diminished responsibility and provocation were relied upon. The jury rejected these defences.

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110204013215/http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/144_7538.htm
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1052 on: February 02, 2021, 03:22:16 PM »
It’s started

In response to Lithium

Simon Hall admitted his guilt and subsequently took his own life over it, and Sandra still refuses to admit she was wrong.”

Sandra Lean states here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452332.html#msg452332
Wrong again! The details of the confession were never made public. It was never revealed whether Simon Hall had legal representation when making the confession. It was never revealed whether he had been assessed by a psychiatrist or psychologist or what his mental state was in the lead up to the confession - was he in sound mind, fully aware of what he was saying/doing? I can see no reason why those details were not publicly known -- they should have been, in order to confirm that the confession actually fitted the details of the crime and that he was not, for example, suffering some sort of mental breakdown and just saying anything.

Once again, I'm searching for the truth. If the confession contains details that all fit with the crime and it can be shown that he was in sound mind and was fully aware of what he was saying and doing, then it would be reasonable to accept that he did, in fact, commit the murder and managed to conceal that fact for all those years, aided by a bungled police investigation which brought a case lacking the necessary elements of proof (even Keir Starmer admitted that, without the fibre evidence, "the case disappears.")


Sandra Lean was free and able to contact Simon Hall directly at any time after she learned she’d been conned! .

She’s LYING btw! She gave me the impression she had accepted the confession at the time.
Around the same time she claimed she’d wasted 10 years of her life.
She also expressed her concerns re the relationship between Corrine and Luke Mitchell (mother & son)
And around the same time she asked if she could post on WAP Simon Hall was dead!

Moving on,

WHY did Luke and Corrine Mitchell LIE to the police over his whereabouts that evening?

This is interesting

According to convicted but exonerated murderer Michael O’Brien (one of the so called Cardiff Newsagent 3)

On the 27th February 2014 he publicly stated,

Sandra Lean has done so much for victims of miscarriages of justice and I am sickened that anyone could even suggest she was responsible for Simon Hall’s death so whoever is responsible for these malicious lies had better stop. Hope your health gets better soon Sandra thinking of you. XX’
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 03:26:49 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1053 on: February 02, 2021, 04:10:57 PM »
This is interesting

According to convicted but exonerated murderer Michael O’Brien (one of the so called Cardiff Newsagent 3)

On the 27th February 2014 he publicly stated,

Sandra Lean has done so much for victims of miscarriages of justice and I am sickened that anyone could even suggest she was responsible for Simon Hall’s death so whoever is responsible for these malicious lies had better stop. Hope your health gets better soon Sandra thinking of you. XX’

Who allegedly told Michael O’Brien between the 23rd and the 27th February 2014 Sandra Lean ‘was responsible for Simon Hall’s death’ ?
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 04:31:29 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1054 on: February 02, 2021, 04:24:20 PM »
And interestingly - on the 4th December 2020 Sandra Lean stated,

‘As a clinical hypnotherapist, I know a bit about the power of suggestion. Confusion is a really powerful technique - while the conscious mind is trying to work out the confusing information, the ‘suggestion” is quietly being absorbed...’

« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 04:27:49 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1055 on: February 03, 2021, 11:18:54 AM »
Around 7 months ago Sandra Lean ‘interviewed’ Jane Metcalfe https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OrbpA1zUquY

Jane Metcalfe is without doubt being manipulated and exploited by many

Robin Garbutt’s innocence campaign is grounded in dishonesty - like Luke Mitchell’s - and has the hallmarks of innocence fraud

It appears Robin Garbutt - although convicted of murder - may have benefitted financially from his crimes

It’s not known if the CCRC are reviewing any ‘forfeiture ruling’ in this case but a decision regarding their review is due soon

« Last Edit: February 03, 2021, 11:26:15 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1056 on: February 05, 2021, 09:24:51 AM »
Interestingly one of Sandra Lean’s twitter accounts @LongRdtoJustice here https://mobile.twitter.com/LongRdtoJustice/with_replies

LongRoadtoJustice
@LongRdtoJustice
·
Oct 26, 2018
Launching today, my new book #InnocentsBetrayed – the truth about the conviction of Luke Mitchell for the murder of Jodi Jones. Profits from the book to help set up a new organisation #LongRoadtoJustice to help the fight against injustice in this country.
http://longroadtojustice.com

Was ‘following’ 3 and had 1 ‘follower’

The 1 ‘follower’ was Michelle Nicolson a convicted murderer - found guilty of killing her father Keith Nicolson

The facts of the case were as follows. The deceased Keith Nicholson was the father of the applicant. He was addicted to drugs and alcohol. His son (the applicant’s brother) under the influence of his father had himself abused and become addicted to drugs. The trial judge was of the view that the motive for the murder was a desire by the applicant to remove the deceased as a bad influence on his son. The applicant initiated the idea of killing her father. She recruited her co-defendant Smethurst who co-operated in the planning of the offence and in the killing itself. At the time of these events he was infatuated with her.

4. In accordance with the plan made by the two defendants, they drove the victim to the North Yorkshire moors, knocked him unconscious with a pickaxe handle, and set him alight with petrol. The applicant’s defence was that, despite her admitted presence at the time of the offence, she took no part in it, and/or was suffering from acute stress disorder. The partial defences of diminished responsibility and provocation were relied upon. The jury rejected these defences.

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110204013215/http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/144_7538.htm

Convicted murderer Michelle Nicholson on Sandra Lean and her 2nd book (2nd Feb 2012)

True story of one off many injustices. Thank you God for people like Sandra Lean’ (sic)
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1057 on: February 05, 2021, 09:54:52 AM »
Convicted murderer Michelle Nicholson on Sandra Lean and her 2nd book (2nd Feb 2012)

True story of one off many injustices. Thank you God for people like Sandra Lean’ (sic)

Michelle Nicholson has links to Michael Naughton (aka Ciaran Quinn) and Simon Buckden


’Fraudster Simon Buckden was praised in commons by PM
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-leeds-37878579

Cancer lie military clerk Simon Buckden jailed
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-37895322

Former soldier 'offended' by fraudster Simon Buckden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-leeds-37878577
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 10:00:09 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1058 on: February 05, 2021, 10:00:56 AM »
Michelle Nicholson has links to Michael Naughton (aka Ciaran Quinn) and Simon Buckden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-leeds-37878577

Ciaran Quinn aka Michael Naughton
https://www.mandy.com/uk/actor/ciaran-quinn-1

Michael Naughtonwill talk about statement analysis and wiil give an example of evidenced failings by police/cps and how he build a case for the client.
 
Covering the UK, Lewis Legal Miscarriages of Justice Investigations UK  are one of the UK's  professional Miscarriages of Justice Investigation firm, choosing to specialise in Miscarriages of Justice and evidence gathering for CCRC applications, Pre-trial hearings and at the point immediately post arrest, Private Prosecutions, providing professional, discrete and confidential results, whether your case centres around a criminal (pretrial or post trial) or civil matter.

https://www.unitedagainstinjustice.com/contributers-2019-cont

Networking’ https://www.unitedagainstinjustice.com/the-day-networking

’Michelle Nicholson is aiming to raise monies to contribute towards legal funds to lodge an appeal. This is following an investigation carried out by Lewis Legal Miscarriage of Justice Investigations UK
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/justiceformichelle-nicholson-1?utm_id=66&utm_term=WYKbNJmrp

Michael Naughton ‘Legal Lewis’ (subject of a compulsory strike-off in 2018) http://www.lewislegal.co.uk/take-action-1
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 10:20:42 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1059 on: February 08, 2021, 01:08:01 PM »
Did Sandra Lean lie when she made claim she had pulled ‘No Smoke’ from publication?

Has anyone followed this up?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/No-Smoke-Sandra-Lean/dp/1906628009
« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 01:27:06 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1060 on: February 08, 2021, 03:11:59 PM »
Did Sandra Lean lie when she made claim she had pulled ‘No Smoke’ from publication?

Has anyone followed this up?


https://www.amazon.co.uk/No-Smoke-Sandra-Lean/dp/1906628009

Checkpoint press (The publisher of ‘No Smoke’) ‘was first established in 2005 by Dr Stephen T Manning, a self published author, teacher/trainer and adjunct university professor.

http://www.checkpointpress.com/aboutus.html

Mr Manning’s twitter bio reads,

Administrator of the Integrity Ireland Association for justice, transparency & accountability; and a prospective (genuinely) independent candidate for Co. Mayo.
https://mobile.twitter.com/stephentmanning?lang=en
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1061 on: February 08, 2021, 03:20:17 PM »
Checkpoint press (The publisher of ‘No Smoke’) ‘was first established in 2005 by Dr Stephen T Manning, a self published author, teacher/trainer and adjunct university professor.

http://www.checkpointpress.com/aboutus.html

Mr Manning’s twitter bio reads,

Administrator of the Integrity Ireland Association for justice, transparency & accountability; and a prospective (genuinely) independent candidate for Co. Mayo.
https://mobile.twitter.com/stephentmanning?lang=en

Stephen Manning was sentenced to two months in jail last week. However, he was not in Castlebar District Court to hear the judge’s ruling on a charge of breaching the peace in the town’s courthouse last year. Instead, he was in Dublin, trying to hand in a petition to the Supreme Court.
Manning continues to deny the Castlebar charge and says he was never told he was due in court. He is now on bail pending an appeal. “It’s scary, it’s very scary,” he says.
Manning, a retired teacher, has been in many courts. In the beginning, he was there with other members of his group, Integrity Ireland, to protest against home repossessions in Mayo.
More recently, however, he has begun to use an obscure legal provision dating from Victorian times which allows private citizens to criminally prosecute those they believe have broken the law.
Under the 1851 Petty Sessions Act a person can ask a judge to issue a summons for a suspected lawbreaker. A garda or lawyer is not required. The standard of evidence necessary for issuing a summons is quite low.


https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/the-man-who-knows-how-to-make-a-citizen-s-arrest-1.2962423

FREE INNOCENT PRISONER STEPHEN MANNING’ https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/free-innocent-prisoner-stephen-manning

Order
16. ’The applicant’s summary trial has now been the subject of 7 High Court applications (all unsuccessful) which essentially have been doomed by an understandable failure by the applicant, as a lay litigant, to appreciate correct legal procedures. Such a multiplication of proceedings takes the concept of “serial litigation” to a new level. I understand that these outcomes must be frustrating for him but on the other hand the conventional pathways to an effective remedy in relation to summary trials are well-established. More fundamentally, an effective remedy does not equate to a right to win one’s case.

17. For those reasons I will decline to order an inquiry.

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da05eea4653d07dedfd6986/amp


« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 03:27:44 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1062 on: February 08, 2021, 03:28:56 PM »
Stephen Manning was sentenced to two months in jail last week. However, he was not in Castlebar District Court to hear the judge’s ruling on a charge of breaching the peace in the town’s courthouse last year. Instead, he was in Dublin, trying to hand in a petition to the Supreme Court.
Manning continues to deny the Castlebar charge and says he was never told he was due in court. He is now on bail pending an appeal. “It’s scary, it’s very scary,” he says.
Manning, a retired teacher, has been in many courts. In the beginning, he was there with other members of his group, Integrity Ireland, to protest against home repossessions in Mayo.
More recently, however, he has begun to use an obscure legal provision dating from Victorian times which allows private citizens to criminally prosecute those they believe have broken the law.
Under the 1851 Petty Sessions Act a person can ask a judge to issue a summons for a suspected lawbreaker. A garda or lawyer is not required. The standard of evidence necessary for issuing a summons is quite low.


https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/the-man-who-knows-how-to-make-a-citizen-s-arrest-1.2962423

FREE INNOCENT PRISONER STEPHEN MANNING’ https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/free-innocent-prisoner-stephen-manning

Order
16. ’The applicant’s summary trial has now been the subject of 7 High Court applications (all unsuccessful) which essentially have been doomed by an understandable failure by the applicant, as a lay litigant, to appreciate correct legal procedures. Such a multiplication of proceedings takes the concept of “serial litigation” to a new level. I understand that these outcomes must be frustrating for him but on the other hand the conventional pathways to an effective remedy in relation to summary trials are well-established. More fundamentally, an effective remedy does not equate to a right to win one’s case.

17. For those reasons I will decline to order an inquiry.

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da05eea4653d07dedfd6986/amp

Stephen Manning even gets a mention in Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

Special thanks to Stephen Manning, of Checkpoint Publishing. Without his encouragement and enthusiasm, I may not have been in a position to undertake this research.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9834706.pdf

Allegations against Stephen T Manning – the truth and the facts’ - according to Stephen Manning/b]
http://www.checkpoint.ie/Allegations%20against%20Stephen%20T%20Manning.pdf

http://www.checkpoint.ie/Private%20Eye%20Article.JPG

Exposure Publishing is listed as of 1st May 2007
« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 11:06:47 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1063 on: February 08, 2021, 04:30:41 PM »
Stephen Manning even gets a mention in Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

Special thanks to Stephen Manning, of Checkpoint Publishing. Without his encouragement and enthusiasm, I may not have been in a position to undertake this research.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9834706.pdf

Judge said notice of appeal filed by Stephen Manning, from Co Mayo, ‘a bit gobbledygook’ - 22 Nov 2019

‘During the case management procedure, Mr Justice Birmingham told Mr Manning that his 42-page notice of appeal was “somewhat lacking in focus”, and was “a bit gobbledygook”.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/lay-litigant-attempts-citizen-s-arrest-on-dpp-solicitor-in-court-1.4092085


Stitch up or stand-off’
https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=900265200310189&_rdr


More
https://wondereraround.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/proof-of-stephen-t-manning’s-fraudulent-court-claims-against-diggory-press-and-rosalind-miriam-franklin-illegally-using-someone-else’s-name/

https://wondereraround.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/the-smear-about-kingdom-come-publishing-and-deborah-g-hunter/

http://www.theindependentpublishingmagazine.com/2008/01/poddy-mouth-post-comment.html
« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 04:59:58 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #1064 on: February 08, 2021, 05:01:05 PM »
Checkpoint press (The publisher of ‘No Smoke’) ‘was first established in 2005 by Dr Stephen T Manning, a self published author, teacher/trainer and adjunct university professor.

http://www.checkpointpress.com/aboutus.html


’Stephen T Manning’s qualifications that he so loves boasting about are actually bought from an unaccredited “diploma mill”. https://wondereraround.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/stephen-t-manning’s-checkpoint-press-fraudulent-books-defrauding-the-book-buying-public/


’Claiming killer innocent part of search for truth‘ - May 2007
No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice, by Sandra Lean is published by Diggory Press, Exposure Publishing, priced 11.99. It is available to order on www.amazon.co.uk
https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/claiming-killer-innocent-part-search-truth-2453025

’Diggory Press: When Publishing Nightmare Becomes Reality Show
http://www.theindependentpublishingmagazine.com/2009/11/diggory-press-when-publishing-nightmare-becomes-reality-show.html

https://wondereraround.wordpress.com/tag/diggory-press-court-case/
« Last Edit: February 08, 2021, 05:41:07 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation