They are Nirvana’s words not those of the Jones family. Further there are many reasons for remaining silent, family pressure, not wishing to upset other family members, valuing privacy etc, etc.
Unless you are willing to reveal on whose ‘very good authority’ you learned this direction by the judge I think the members are quite at liberty to treat your claim as yet another piece of the misinformation you are now famous for spreading. I post that the jury could have been split 7/8 and you suddenly have a source, that you’ve never mentioned before, who says otherwise.
I think it’s time to put up….well you know the rest.
I won't even ask for a cite as way of proof. Neither will I need one to state that Nirvana far less Kurt Cobain chose those words for this girls memorial stone. Best to leave it at that in case this tiny spot of cyber space, "two bit forum" should be read and the Jones family get done over copyright issues. ;-)
Perhaps now that Mitchell has suddenly reached manhood he will tell the truth, one has their doubts however. That the many people who read this thread may ask him about that direction. Does it matter if I am believed in this "two bit forum?" It is insignificant is it not? Oddly or coincidently? many of the points raised have found their way over to different groups/social media. Ms Lean no less has brought up several areas of discussion from here. This forum that she has always maintained she will never be a part of, for personal reasons over her claimed distaste? Oddly or coincidently yet again - she is far from not being actively part of it, to the point where one can almost see those strings being pulled on her puppets?
Of these character assassination claims, a far cry from those over time who have received this treatment? Which stemmed directly from that period of time prior to Mitchells arrest. The formation of that jigsaw in the birth of Jigsawman? One could accurately describe it as hounding people mercilessly, one person/family in particular to have them in that top spot of suspects publicly. Via a book and onto the cover of this doc with that intentional blip at the end. And perhaps this plays a real part in why there is that withdrawal - mission accomplished in getting it out there. And I am not talking of the case of LM V HMA here, but that of Jigsawman V these others.Where this woman clearly believed, in excess of 7 months prior to Mitchells arrest that there was no case to answer to. - How gravely wrong has she been albeit steadfast in touting one's wares? Her questions set in stone then were never going to go away. Most of which were formed whilst colluding with the Mitchells. The murderer his mother and friend?
Ah the infamous shampoo by Parky, that cherry picking of wording. - Of Ms Lean knowing that the doctor meant Mitchells hair was greasy, dirty, manky, not washed for days due to the doctor not saying, "It smelled of shampoo" So let us think of misinformation and of that doctors report and that verbatim of "unwashed". And now some proper context. This report is from samples taken between 5-6am some 12 hours after the murder. The doctor took a sample, his hair was not forensically tested all over for blood and all else. The sample was for comparison of anything that may be found at the crime scene. And how this appeared "unwashed" some 12hrs later. Now the boys in the wood. Of LM being somewhat cleaner, of his hair being different - not his usual unkempt self. Let's go further back to the murder and of that parka with it's hood, with boots on covering his ankles over his socks and trousers. So we have a boy covered quite literally from head to foot. We have an area which is surrounded by rivers. We have a house just minutes from the murder scene. It is detached. And out of all these people (others) LM's is the one house that required just a very short distance to reach from the woodland.The duo a noisy bike, two of them over an open exposed area of paths onto field and house. Seen. SK a village and a half away with a solid alibi that was not concocted, he knew not of when one was required for. Completely oblivious to his DNA being present. For that is the reality here, of not striving to give one The Jones house, half a village away. And again no concoction of anything, no need to make anything up. It was as it was.
To conclude of what I have witnessed by reading these many forums. That there has been a clear vendetta against these others, namely Jodi's family. That stemmed from that friendship with the Mitchells at a time they thought there would be no arrest. The birth of that first question. Of double standards, of why these two families were not being treated the same? Of why others appeared to be eliminated when one thought there was still a killer out there (SL) That these claims have always been without foundation. For there was no way of knowing at the time and onwards of how the investigation had been led. That ones personal niggles and beliefs had no place in the slightest upon the murder of Jodi Jones. More so, when one had the projection of what is claimed to have happened put to them by the actual murderer. Exactly how much of a mug has the Jigsawman then to present day been? - believing not for a moment they could outsmart those who truly matter, but certainly those whom give not a jot for the actual truth. And we know this, as common sense tells those with it - that the truth does not lie in a book, from one whom colluded from the off with Luke Mitchell and his mother. That there can be no doubt of the lies told. No need for scraping at the bottom of any barrels. Scraping to project this, but "what about them?"
