I am beginning to understand what The German Prosecution are doing. They are marrying the old with the new, the convictions with the new evidence and the credibility of certain witnesses regarding the two apparently unknown victims wherein the MO is ever present. Hazel Behan's evidence will be crucial so what does Fulscher intend to try to do when she is on The Stand? Trashing her won't go down well with The Judges.
I got the impression that his tough questioning of the young woman who witnessed Brueckner
exposing himself to the children in the playground when she was a child didn't go down well. Particularly when he was admonished from someone at the Portuguese link.
Perhaps he will have learned from that and will conduct future questioning of other survivors more appropriately.
SnipA Portuguese police officer sitting next to her reminded the Braunschweig regional court that the young woman could be ‘traumatised’ by in-depth cross examination.
But this didn’t stop Brueckner’s defence lawyer Friedrich Fulscher from asking numerous questions about the difference between urinating and masturbating. Was it possible she knew the difference?
https://archive.ph/zXw3H#selection-1489.0-1489.196
