That's what I said, you can surmise, but not really know, that's all. As for inquests and post mortems I don't recall making any big song and dance about them specifically...my main query was about SD staying schtum for years anywhere and everywhere..IMO if he loved his wife he wouldn't scurry off like a little rat at every opportunity...then again maybe he is just a little wimp, who knows....he might be scared of South African kidnappers out to get him in the middle of the night or something...nice theory? Doesn't explain his blanking of his beloveds family though!! Disgraceful.
When the evidence proves something conclusively, then its no longer a matter of surmising
but rather a matter of knowing
. The evidence proved beyond any doubt that the "murder for hire" story was made up by the three criminals.
I am not sure why you, like the Hindochas, keep coming back to this idea that Shrien Dewani owes a public explanation for his sexuality or his other actions. He owes nothing to anybody. He was a victim of the crime just like Anni was. He is "blanking" his beloveds family for the rather simple reason that they continue to blame him for the murder, despite all evidence to the contrary.
His adultery and duplicity was a matter between him and Anni. He had every right to stay schtum in the wake of the malicious prosecution, and as previously pointed out, it was probably not even his choice but rather that of his lawyer or maybe even his brother (who is also a lawyer). To describe him obeying legal advice as "scurrying off like a rat" shows your bias. Your bias in itself is interesting, considering on your own admission you know little about the case. You have declined to offer a view when asked various questions in this thread, citing your lack of knowledge as a reason to rather express no view at all. Yet your lack of knowledge does not stop you expressing a vehement view that Shrien Dewani must have been involved in the crime.