Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 14791 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #30 on: March 26, 2017, 08:04:37 PM »
Funny you should say that ... I have just come across the judges ruling about that one ... they put on record some unsavoury facts concerning Amaral ... I may post them for you at some stage.

Will it make any difference?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -  10 years and still no solution.

Online Eleanor

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #31 on: March 26, 2017, 08:18:22 PM »
Why not now?

Amaral was arrested and convicted.  There is no Libel in that statement.

Offline Slartibartfast

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #32 on: March 26, 2017, 08:26:00 PM »
Amaral was arrested and convicted.  There is no Libel in that statement.

What's that got to do with anything. Brietta said she had been looking at the ruling and they put on record some unsavoury facts about GA, the logical time to share them would have been at that point, otherwise it is just another uncited statement and should be treated as such.
Helping Elite sufferers of NPD for over 2 years...

Offline Alice Purjorick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Total likes: 2630
  • One man's style must not be the rule of another's.
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #33 on: March 26, 2017, 09:14:42 PM »
Will it make any difference?


Not to the judgement.
I tell you it's Burt Reynolds

Offline Angelo222

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #34 on: March 26, 2017, 09:24:32 PM »
What's that got to do with anything. Brietta said she had been looking at the ruling and they put on record some unsavoury facts about GA, the logical time to share them would have been at that point, otherwise it is just another uncited statement and should be treated as such.

Who put on record some unsavoury facts about GA?  Is this sour grapes?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Slartibartfast

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2017, 09:25:32 PM »
Who put on record some unsavoury facts about GA?  Is this sour grapes?

That's what we are trying to find out.
Helping Elite sufferers of NPD for over 2 years...

Offline kizzy

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #36 on: March 26, 2017, 09:29:30 PM »
The first thing to point out is that the McCanns made such a fuss about getting access to these files, and when they do, Gerry is speechless on his blog for 3 whole weeks! Secondly, the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine has not been closed. It has been shelved until new information becomes available. Thirdly, I lost count the amount of times the McCanns and Clarence Mitchell told reporters they could not go into details because of the judicial secrecy. This has now been lifted for a month and still the Mccanns and Clarence Mitchell refuse to go into detail. There can only be one explanation for this continued silence, they have got something to hide. It is time that the Mainstream Media started putting leading questions to the McCanns, or asking them to now provide the details which they said before they were prevented from so doing.


Offline Alice Purjorick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Total likes: 2630
  • One man's style must not be the rule of another's.
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #37 on: March 26, 2017, 09:37:58 PM »
Who put on record some unsavoury facts about GA?  Is this sour grapes?

It doesn't really matter, the end game was the judgement was not in the McCann's favour.
I tell you it's Burt Reynolds

Online Eleanor

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #38 on: March 26, 2017, 09:40:13 PM »
The first thing to point out is that the McCanns made such a fuss about getting access to these files, and when they do, Gerry is speechless on his blog for 3 whole weeks! Secondly, the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine has not been closed. It has been shelved until new information becomes available. Thirdly, I lost count the amount of times the McCanns and Clarence Mitchell told reporters they could not go into details because of the judicial secrecy. This has now been lifted for a month and still the Mccanns and Clarence Mitchell refuse to go into detail. There can only be one explanation for this continued silence, they have got something to hide. It is time that the Mainstream Media started putting leading questions to the McCanns, or asking them to now provide the details which they said before they were prevented from so doing.

Erm,  I think that you might not be with the rest of us.

Have a read around, and then come back.  This is 2017, and not 2008.

Online Brietta

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #39 on: March 26, 2017, 10:13:27 PM »
Who put on record some unsavoury facts about GA?  Is this sour grapes?

Not at all.
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #40 on: March 27, 2017, 07:35:33 AM »
Who put on record some unsavoury facts about GA?  Is this sour grapes?
Sour milk would be worse.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline kizzy

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #41 on: March 27, 2017, 10:54:33 AM »
Erm,  I think that you might not be with the rest of us.

Have a read around, and then come back.  This is 2017, and not 2008.

Oh i have looked around . 

« Last Edit: March 27, 2017, 10:59:40 AM by Eleanor »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #42 on: March 27, 2017, 11:01:29 AM »
The first thing to point out is that the McCanns made such a fuss about getting access to these files, and when they do, Gerry is speechless on his blog for 3 whole weeks! Secondly, the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine has not been closed. It has been shelved until new information becomes available. Thirdly, I lost count the amount of times the McCanns and Clarence Mitchell told reporters they could not go into details because of the judicial secrecy. This has now been lifted for a month and still the Mccanns and Clarence Mitchell refuse to go into detail. There can only be one explanation for this continued silence, they have got something to hide. It is time that the Mainstream Media started putting leading questions to the McCanns, or asking them to now provide the details which they said before they were prevented from so doing.
Strange thing is that 3 persons liked this post.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline stephen25000

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #43 on: March 27, 2017, 11:09:46 AM »
Strange thing is that 3 persons liked this post.

Why ?
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline kizzy

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #44 on: March 27, 2017, 11:58:48 AM »
Erm,  I think that you might not be with the rest of us.

Have a read around, and then come back.  This is 2017, and not 2008.

well has anything changed since 2008.

Have they ever explained what they couldn't talk about then. because of the judicial secrecy.

No, all they have done is gone after G. Ameral