We have struggled to understand why Dr Vincent Tabak was originally charged on The 24th January 2011, that between the 16th December The 26th December 2010, he killed Joanna Yeates..
Obviously some bright spark asked the question.. why the range of date... and stating that "We" know ahe was alive on the 17th December 2010... Now I will transcribe the video in case it goes missing... It's a short clip again of 26 seconds and was made on the 24th January 2011 by a TV News outlet...
The charge was put before Mr Tabak that he murdered his neighbour between the 16th and the 26th of December.
But in fact we know Ms Yeates was last seen on the 17th and that her body was found on the 25th. The CPS told Channel 4 News that the dates had to be kept necessarily broad because Detectives still do not know exactly when the 25 year old was killed.
The CPS has to be Ann Reddrop, she isn't going to let just anyone give that information out....(IMO)
So Miss Reddrop.... You had
No idea when Joanna Yeates was killed when you arrested Dr Vincent Tabak.My question to you then is..... If at this point of charging Dr Vincent Tabak on the 24th January 2011, how did you know he had
killed her..??What Evidence did you have that proved Dr Vincent Tabak killed Joanna Yeates ????
You are admitting you had no idea about when she died... and your range of dates suggest that.... And the video from The News outlet states that!
So that brings in to question when was she put on Longwood Lane??? Because surely you the prosecution claim she had been there since Friday 17th December 2010...
I really need to know , with what evidence did you charge Dr Vincent Tabak.... You knew where he was all over the Christmas Period... DC Karen Thomas called him on the 24th December 2010 whilst he was staying in Cambridge.. (You make us believe you knew that...)
You also were aware that he then went over to Holland where the same DC Karen Thomas Interviewed him for 6 hours... where may I add she should have cautioned him... Because... As I have posted DCI Phil Jones states after the trial that Dr Vincent Tabak was a suspect within 10 days of Joanna Yeates being found.!!!
So I think you have contradicted yourself Ann.... You have NO IDEA... Yet you have arrested a man that you know was not around a great deal of the time !!!! (Or did you NOT KNOW ANN!!!)
Is that why by the time you took Dr Vincent Tabak to trial, you changed the charge dates for between the 16th December 2010 and the 19th December 2010.... because Dr Vincent Tabak was still in Bristol!!!Ann..Ann..Ann... I am not that gulible.... If you didn't know on the 24th January 2011... you didn't know in October 2011 when the trial took place either.... Did you!!!
You kept the 16th December which I find curious... why ???? Why the 16th December 2010... Is it because it wasn't that weekend??? Is that why the trial is made up of people proving they saw or heard from her on the 17th December 2010... Do these people actually say the 17th December 2010 when they are on the stand????
Did Rebecca Scott know more than she has told us??? (I am not accusing Rebecca Scott of anything... Just wondering if she was told not to say anything else other than about the phone call)....
Did Rebecca Scott ever say that she spoke to Joanna Yeates on Friday the 17th December 2010?? Or does she just say she was the last person to speak to her ?????
I put it to you Ann Reddrop... when DC Karen Thomas made that telephone call to Dr vincent Tabak on the 24th December 2010... she had NO IDEA That he was actually in Cambridge.... And when you realised that he had an alibi for the 24th December 2010, you changed the charge dates to between the 16th December 2010 and the 19th December 2010.... (IMO)....
Come on Ann... tell me... Am I correct?????
Because I believe that Dr Vincent Tabak said 'NO COMMENT" to virtually every question when he was first arrested... Didn't he .... He virtually doesn't say a word until the 22nd September 2011... So how could you have know to change the charge date ?????
It's possible and most probable that you have actually spoken to Tanja Morson.. you find out that Dr Vincent Tabak was with her in Cambridge on the 24th December 2010... Is that how you learnt Dr Vincent Tabak had an alibi for this time frame ????
You must have a statement from Tanja Morson Miss Reddrop.... "surely"?? I would love to see it Ann... Please just pm me with the info......!!!
How can you change the charge date ???? Is that even legal?????
Again Ann I will ask you another question.... Was Joanna Yeates actually recovered on the 26th December 2010??
Because to me it would make sense to DCI Andrew Moss's statement in court that he had to try stop her body from thawing!!... Was she somewhere hard to reach?? These question may seem foolish... But Ann you have shown time and time again... That you wanted Dr Vincent Tabak away in prison at any cost....(IMO)...And you kept the 16th December 2010 in the charge against Dr Vincent Tabak...... so the 26th December 2010 also had to be of significance....(IMO)
Why did you still include the 16th December 2010 in the charge, if Joanna yeates was supposed to be alive then???
You see Ann... I originally thought that the two dates being 16th December 2010.. meaning she was alive and the 26th December 2010 meaning she was definitely dead... But that cannot be the case.. Seeing as you changed the charge date from between the 16th December 2010 and the 26th December 2010.... To the 16th December and the 19th December 2010...
Again my question has to be ..
Why The 16th December 2010??? Is that the day she went into Bargain Booze and the Robin Payne was working there at the time and said that.... "Joanna Yeates came in on the night before the students went home for the holidays".... So Ann... had Joanna Yeates gone Missing from the 16th December 2010?? Because your charge from that date does not make sense and suggest to me that it is possible......
And remember Ann.. Your original range of dates was from the 16th December 2010 to the 26th December 2010... So I will ask again and again.... Why still include the 16th December 2010 in Dr Vincent Tabak's charge... If the date of the 16th December 2010 isn't
Significant??? Is that what the real killer would know ???
So tell me again what EVIDENCE you had to arrest Dr Vncent Tabak in the first place.... we know that on the 20th January 2010, the Police believed that she had been taken away from the property in a suitcase or large holdall... So there cannot have been any evidence at Flat 1 of any kind of assault... which included Dr Vincent Tabak being involved!!! (IMO)..
Did the CCTV footage that DS Mark Saunders viewed from Canygne Road show someone with a Large Suit Case or Holdall on Canygne Road... The description sounds vague... like they have seen someone or something but just can't quite make it out.... Is this why we never see the private CCTV footage in court!!!!
Search teams are still inside the neighbouring Flat this evening It's reported that Detectives believe that Ms Yeates body could of been transported in a Suitcase or Large Holdall
Why would they even suggest such a thing???? Unless they saw it???
Did you or the police see someone leave the Canygne Road area with a Suitcase or large Holdall???? It seems a reasonable question to me.... What do you say ??
Did the Police show Ann Reddrop the footage from Canygne Road??? Did Flat 1 show signs of a fight or struggle, but because there was nothing forensically linking Dr Vincent Tabak to Flat 1, the evidence couldn't be brought to court??
We have descriptions of an untidy Flat... Greg tidying up as he went along... Something in that Flat made Joanna Yeates mother believe that she had been abducted... Yet no evidence is brought to court for the jury to understand why she may have thought that was possible....
What does the evidence in Flat 1 Canygne Road show Ann??? What did it tell everyone ????
We have NO Forced Entry, but signs of an abduction... We have NO signs of how Joanna Yeates left Flat 1.. Yet we are suggesting a Suitcase or Large Holdall... We have CCTV of Canygne Road, but we don't bring it to trial... We have a range of dates between the 16th December 2010 and the 26th December 2010.. But we suddenly decide it had to be the Dutchman on the 17th December 2010... We stick with the 16th December 2010, without any valid reason for this date... Never mind questioning why Dr Vincent Tabak was charged changed twice that between 16th December 2010 and the 26th December 2010.. when he first appeared at Bristol court and when he is at trial between the 16th December 2010 and the 19th December 2010.. that he did kill Joanna Yeates...
We need to be questioning.... WHY The 16th December 2010 in the first place.....(IMO)..http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/655512858[attachment deleted by admin]