WHAT LEAD TO THE TIMING OF THE ARREST OF DR VINCENT TABAK.....
The investigation has reached a stage where it could be subjected to an independent review by a senior officer who has not been involved thus far.
The spokesman said: "National guidance suggests a review should take place somewhere between 28 and 42 days but how that is done, who does it and the scope of the review are up to each individual force and will depend very much on the nature of the investigation in question. These reviews are routine practice and will be considered by us when we believe the time to be right. We continue to have a dedicated team of investigators who will remain on this case until we find and bring to justice whoever is responsible for killing Joanna Yeates."
This quote from the article in the Bristol post is Dated 15th January 2010:
This could be the possible reason for them arresting Dr Vincent Tabak when they did:
The spokesman said: "National guidance suggests a review should take place somewhere between 28 and 42 days
He even says:
These reviews are routine practice and will be considered by us when we believe the time to be right.
So he is having to conceed that someone else will Take over the INVESTIGATION and it will be out of his hands!!!!!
Do you think he's going to hand this over to someone else to get the GLORY!!!!! not in my opinion....
Lets just look at the dates: Joanna Yeates was found on 25th Dec 2010
Dr Vincent Tabak was arrested on 20th January 2011 = 26 days later
The 20th January 2011 was a Thursday; =26 days later
Saturday the 22rd January would have brought it to the =28 days
So the first opportunity I think would have been the Monday the 24th January to review the Joanna Yeates case:
Lets look at what pressures the team were under at this point:
The investigation has reached a stage where it could be subjected to an independent review by a senior officer who has not been involved thus far.
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/joanna-yeates-murder-detectives-link-cold-case/story-11281334-detail/story.html#ldmP6DbTwv0S35vU.99I'll look at headlines and articles leading up to Dr Vincent Tabak's arrest:
Article Dated 5th January 2011
Police investigating the murder of Joanna Yeates are coming under growing criticism of their handling of the case.
They hadn't got a scooby as to what was going on... No evidence...
Let's not forget: DNA has been turned round 48 hours: So Dr Vincent Tabak should have been ruled out by this point!!!
They hadn't arrested him till the 20th January.. some 15 days later....
If we are to believe Lyndsey Lennen's statement 48 hours.....she did the testing.... My ALARM BELLS are ringing!!!
31st December 2011.... 48 hours after that = 2nd January 2011 ....So NO MATCH then........
All the information is fed in to a computer, so by this point, if Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA sample from Holland was a match, it would have come back as that by the 2nd January 2011
They have NO other evidence against Dr Vincent Tabak when they arrest him on the 20th Dec 2010. only the supposed DNA... which we know was tested alot earlier nothing had changed when they arrested Dr Vincent Tabak....
The Supposed PORN on his computer was only there to BOLSTER the STORY they wanted us to believe... The Same with the searches.... I'm sure i can explain those searches too...
One I already have and Dr Vincent Tabak wasn't even in his house when that search was supposed to have been made!!!!!
This Next Article is dated the 5th January 2011
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8240280/Joanna-Yeates-murder-police-face-criticism.htmlDetectives admit that they still do not know where and when the landscape architect died and at what stage her body was dumped by the roadside three miles from her flat in Bristol.
Yes:..... This is because there is NO.. Forensic Evidence in the Flat that tells them what happened!!!
Let's split that statement up.....
at what stage her body was dumped by the roadside three miles from her flat
So WHY did they NOT KNOW , when Joanna Yeates had been LEFT in LONGWOOD LANE!!!!!!!
They have been telling everyone SINCE they arrested Dr Vincent Tabak that it was from THE 17th DEC 2010!!!!!
So they must know she could have been left there at anytime.....
Lets not forget ANDREW MOTT saying that he had to stop the body from THAWING!!!!!!!!
So I believe she HADN"T Lain on the verge in LONGWOOD LONE since the 17th DEC 2010...
SOMEBODY would have surely seen her before the 25th December 2010 as it was a busy route and lots of dog walkers Joggers coming down the entrance on the opposite side of the road..
An Avon and Somerset police authority member, who asked not to be named, told the paper it was "worrying" that the police did not appear close to finding the murderer.
"WORRYING":..... Indeed.... you haven't got a clue how Joanna Yeates ended up in Longwood Lane,
Next Article:Dated 15th January 2011
Landlord in Joanna Yeates case: 'I'll be cleared within days'
Why would he know that he'd be cleared within days??? Who has said this to him?????
Is that 5 days????
Joanna Yeates’s landlord expects to be cleared of all involvement in her murder ‘within days’, it emerged last night.
But as we know he wasn't cleared of all involvement, they still suspected CJ had someone assisting him at this point..... We know later they think it's Dr Vincent Tabak..
Now, apparently, they (police) are just waiting for the forensic evidence to come back. That shouldn’t be too long. When it comes back, Chris is confident he will be cleared.’
Apparenty? At this point CJ doesn't obviously know that they turned the DNA tests around in 48 hours!!
What Forensic's are the Police waiting for??? Have they got someone else's DNA other than CJ's and Dr Vincent Tabak's????
We Know how long they have had the DNA samples results for...
Let's keep reminding ourselves 48 hours after Holland (if we believe Holland and not the samples they gave in their original statements...) = 2nd January 2011
Since Mr Jefferies’ arrest, police have been searching the building he shared with Miss Yeates and her boyfriend. That lengthy search was said to have finished last night.
Now what does this mean?? Searching the building???
They would have had access to the Landlords keys... Dr Vincent Tabak, if I remember correctly had moved out of the building with his girlfriend Tanja... And was staying on Aberdeen Road... (did they search his flat ???)
Where there any computers in Dr Vincent Tabaks flat at that time????
So..........
Which parts of the building DID they search???
"The significant snowfall in the early hours of Saturday December 18 has a considerable impact on this and I am working with numerous forensic specialists to determine the timings."
Now at this point... do we really know that Joanna Yeates has been in Longwood Lane since the 17th Dec 2010??
Now is this Statement again... more telling than we realise....
"Significant snowfall on Saturday 18th Dec 2010"...... Why this is important I believe.. is because the Police still considered CJ a suspect...
Remember... The car going over Clifton Suspension Bridge on the Saturday 18th Dec 2010:...
IF...... there was significant snow underneath the body of Joanna Yeates, then I believe the Polices theorised that she had been dumped on Longwood Lane on the 18th Dec 2010 and not the 17th Dec 2010 because of the heavy SNOWFALL... So there must have been plenty of snow underneath Joanna Yeates!!!
So that would be another reason why they thought CJ had committed the crime.....
What timings is he trying to work out?????
He said: "I can assure you, we are determined to solve this crime, and bring Jo's killers to justice."
When asked about this comment later, he said: "I think that phrase emphasises that I am not making any assumptions in this case."
YES..... He is determined!! The review will be happening soon!!!!
Not making any Assumptions?????
Well that's not strictly true is it.... You have already assumped CJ is guilty, because you cannot work out how someone would have gained entry into Joanna Yeates Flat...
You are assuming that she was Killed in her Flat.......
You have assumed it has to be someone in that building.....
v, involving over 70 police officers and staff," Mr Jones said.
"No stone will be left unturned in this investigation."
Again:..... This will take you into the review period where someone MORE SENIOR will be looking at the Investigation..!!!!
Lets Break it down:
"This is potentially a long and complex inquiry.
"
If at this POINT... you haven't got a clue as to who could have possibly committed the crime.. And we are NOT forgetting that you have already tested CJ's and Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA with Nothing coming back at this point....
POTENTIALLY.... doesn't come into it!!! unless you have someone else's DNA like CJ"S suggesting...
No stone will be left unturned
So what massive rocks did you turn over in 15 days???
Erm....... We know at this point you still think CJ is involved!! And your only other suspect is another tenant who gave a supplementary statement Dr Vincent Tabak.....
WOW.... this next statements telling:
Officers have searched through 293 tons of domestic rubbish to find the pizza, and said it is not clear at this stage whether Miss Yeates had eaten it.
WHY..... Is it not clear at this stage that Joanna Yeates has eaten the PIZZA!!!!
We are on the 5th January 2011 now... I thought the testing had been done... So surely her stomach contents would have been tested!!!
So your saying her stomach had NO contents????
So you cannot determine EXACTLY when Joanna yeates died!!!!!
Her Alcohol reading were consistant with having drunk about 2 pints of cider:......
BUT... Again a big BUT....... We have since discovered that there was a CHAMPAGNE CORK on the table in the house... along with a HEALEY"S bottle of CIDER which she didn't buy.....
So she could have drunk that on the Saturday!!!!!! Did you know about the Healey's Cider and Champagne... Tatteringer Reims... Mr Policeman!!!!
Is the Tattinger Reims Champagne and the Healey's Cider, ANOTHER reason you believe Joanna Yeates died on the Saurday 18th December 2010.....
PLUS... you have Kingdom's statement that he heard someone shout"HELP ME".. On Saturday 18th December 2010 about Mid Morning....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8240280/Joanna-Yeates-murder-police-face-criticism.htmlAnd to add to there despair.... This Happens:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8242526/Joanna-Yeates-murder-Christopher-Jefferies-may-sue-police-for-wrongful-arrest.htmlChris Jefferies may sue police for wrongful arrest in Jo Yeates murder case
OOpsie.... You made a Boo Boo there!!!
Jo Yeates murder suspect Chris Jefferies has told a close friend he is considering suing the police for wrongful arrest.
Now... they haven't got a clue who could have killed her... they are NO nearer to finding a suspect.... UNLESS one just drops in their laps..
And to top it all the man that they have arrested and has been vilified by the press.. Is going to SUE...!!!!
I can just see your heads about to explode at this point.... I'm sure your thinking Arrrrgggg... Mr Policeman...
THE REVIEW is coming up:
YOU'VE made a Pigs ear of Arresting the LANDLORD:
YOU HAVE ONE POSSIBLE OPTION LEFT:!!!!!!!
The PLACID Dr Vincent Tabak......
Dr Vincent Tabak... whom in your own words described him As:
A very PLACID individual to deal with
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUSlmEab-38 At about 33:10 minutes into the program:
Again my ALARM BELLS are ringing:....... Is that the reason they went to arrest Dr Vincent Tabak!!!! He was Placid, he was helpful... He WAS NOT Problamatic he was easy to CONFUSE!!!!!!
Another Article:
Steven Morris and agencies
@stevenmorris20
Thursday 6 January 2011 16.38 GMT First published on Thursday 6 January 2011 16.38 GMT
Police hunting the murderer of Joanna Yeates attempted once again to dampen down any expectation that the crime was going to be solved quickly.
So they are Struggling!!!!
Chief Superintendent Jon Stratford, of Avon and Somerset police, said "steady progress" was being made but warned: "It could take some time before we find out who killed Jo but we certainly will."
Like I keep saying they haven't got a clue... Again all the time Remember Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA samples have already been tested and have come back on the latest date 2nd January 2010
Detectives are keeping an open mind over whether the sock was kept by the killer as a trophy and whether she may have been strangled with it.
They definately Know at this point that she wasn't Strangled with the Ski Sock!!! Her Autopsy had been completed on the 28th Dec 2010.... And Dr Delaneys findings are that it was manual Strangulation....
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jan/06/joanna-yeates-murder-police-progressSo I can sort of see why the Police arrested CJ:
(1) He was the Landlord and he had keys to the Flat..
(2) I believe it was his CAR that went over Clifton suspension Bridge on Saturday 18th Dec 2010, that why you interviewed the witness/suspect about it....
(3) It had snowed heavily on Saturday 18th December and snow was underneath Joanna Yeates body..
(4) There was no Pizza found in her stomach contents....
(5) Evidence of a different Cider being HEALEY"S cider and Champagne being TATTINGER REIMS was in the flat and you knew she hadn't bought these!!!
(6) Kingdom saying he heard someone shout "Help Me" on Saturday the 18th December Mid Morning....
But you were STUMPED!!!! Because his DNA didn't match.. and he was too old to lift Joanna Yeates up!!!!
At this point knowing that there is no evidence in the Flat of a struggle... No DNA of anyone in the Falt.... No finger Prints of anyone in the flat....
DID IT NOT CROSS YOUR MINDS THAT SHE LEFT HER FLAT WITH SOMEONE AND THEY BROUGHT HER STUFF BACK!!!!!!!!!
So... so far .... How on earth can this evidence lead to Dr Vincent Tabak being arrested and charged with MURDER!!!!!
They needed someone... anyone so the review didn't happen!!!! (IMO)
And Dr Vincent Tabak was on his own that evening just like CJ had been on his own... So they needed to find a slot where he might have had the time to committ the crime!!!
He was in constant contact with his girlfriend all evening...
He went to Asda.....
They had to fit it around Dr Vincent Tabak being out of the house at the ONLY time he would be alone!!!
Because other than that he has time stamps...
This is why the timestamp on the ASDA video is important...
This is why the 1300 page Document that has Everyones timelines in: Joanna Yeates..Greg Reardon: Tanya Morson and Dr Vincent Tabak:
Is IMPORTANT... It gives timelines of EVERYTHING!!!!
This massive document would PROVE Dr Vincent Tabak didn't have the time to do what they said he did!!!
And the PROSECUTION did NOT give the 1300 PAGE DOCUMENT to the defence till the day of TRAIL!!!!!!!!!
This is why an experiment of lifting a dead weight, from the kitchen... to the bedroom... 2 mins later from the bedroom, through the hallway... turn left up the building.. turn left again across the back of the building... put her down... Go into your own flat...2 minutes later, pick her up again.. move her into your flat.... Put her in a bike bag....
This needs timing!!! He's not allowed to drag her as there are NO drag marks.. he has to carry her... whilst NOT Panicing.... Or leaving any evidence of himself in her flat..... Or evidence of herself in his Flat!!!!!!
HOW MANY MINUTES WOULD THIS TAKE????????????
EDIT:
Please excuse the expression But....
Just a thought..... the supposed sample they had of Dr Vincent Tabak on Joanna Yeates was so small they needed to enhance it using DNA senCE.....
Wouldn't Dr Vincent Tabak have been sweating his B****CKS off trying to move a dead weight about so many times on his own....... Surely he would have deposited a lot more Sweat on Joanna Yeates body... he wouldn't have been able to control that!!!!!
Lyndsey Lennen... Is the Forensic Soecialist...
Andrew Mott... Is the forensic co-ordinator
EDIT:
Look at this:
Mr Jones told reporters yesterday: "At this stage there is no evidence to suggest that Joanna was sexually assaulted.
"However, I have not ruled out that there might have been a sexual motive."
WHY....... are they not ruling out a SEXUAL MOTIVE.. when they KNOW she hasn't been sexually assaulted?????
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8240280/Joanna-Yeates-murder-police-face-criticism.htmlThis is the 5th January 2011:....
Is his brain ticking trying to explain why Joanna Yeates was murdered??????????
Remember he thinks CJ has something to do with her murder still at this point!!!
So why the suggestion of a sexually motivated attack... they obviously didn't think that of CJ!!!
Also REMEMBER.... the supposed searches do not prove intent or anything and the so called PORN was inadmissible...
He had to come up with something!!!!!! (IMO)
They had NOT searched Dr Vincent Tabak's computer by the 5th January 2011..!!!
So where did the IDEA of a SEXUALLY MOTIVATED ATTACK COME FROM......... on the 5th January 2010
Dr Vincent Tabak.... was actually Arrested on the 20th JANUARY 2011 (hadn't seen his comp)!!
"However, I have not ruled out that there might have been a sexual motive.
This is PLANTING the idea in the MINDS of the public that is was Sexually Motivated....(IMO)
Is this you revealing your hand Mr Policeman????????
Sorry to keep editing: BUT...........
He said: "I can assure you, we are determined to solve this crime, and bring Jo's killers to justice."
KILLERS!!!!!!! see he think CJ had something to do with this on the 5th January 2011
NOW we understand Lyndsey Lennen's Statement of:
A colleague went down to supervise the removal of her clothing and preserve any body fluids: "The body was frozen, so that was quite tricky." Under the media glare, the work was flat-out: clothing, swabs, suspect's clothing, all analysed and turned round in 48 hours.
THEY HAD TESTED CJ's and Dr Vincnt Tabak's DNA TOGETHER and at the same time as Joanna Yeates samples were tested.....
He says KILLERS!!!!!!!!!!! plural two of them!!! So why the Crap about a sexually Motivated attack??
Unless its the people that CJ heard at the little GATE!!!!!!!!!!!!
CJ was NOT released from Police Bail until MARCH!!!!!
Did they actually go to Holland and interview Dr Vincent Tabak there???? I have my doubts!!!!
See:
Jo Yeates murder accused Vincent Tabak in court
Bang on!!!!!!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12262194