I wonder what ever gave them that idea, I'd have thought they'd be reporting the "parental involvement" angle instead like they did in 2007.
"A source close to the investigation" perhaps?
SnipPJ's source made it clear to PÚBLICO that the request for the reopening of the proceedings is the result of the work of the Oporto team and not of elements collected by Scotland Yard, who also opened an investigation into the disappearance of Maddie .
https://www.publico.pt/2013/10/24/sociedade/noticia/ministerio-publico-reabre-processo-do-desaparecimento-de-maddie-1610207SnipThe PUBLIC knows that the members of the PJ do Porto have already visited the Algarve several times to gather elements and carry out informal procedures, which will support the need to reopen the case. The reopening of the inquiry is the only way for the PJ to formally inquire these witnesses.
__________________________________________________________
The reanalysis of the case returns to focus the investigation on the kidnapping thesis, the main line followed by Scotland Yard, who also opened an investigation into the disappearance of Maddie. The PJ do Porto team was convinced of this thesis in view of the careful observation of all the information in the process.
https://www.publico.pt/2013/10/23/sociedade/noticia/autoridades-portuguesas-ponderam-reabrir-investigacao-ao-caso-maddie-1610151 ... and if not a very well informed source ... the only other explanation I can see for it is that the journalists have psychic powers.