The question I want to form an opinion on is not guilt or innocence, but whether there is a prospect of a successful application to the CCRC.
The responses I have had on this Forum have been helpful.
Two further questions I have are:
(i). What is Bamber’s current position legally? Has a new CCRC application been submitted? If so, when?
(ii). I note there is fresh evidence in the form of the telephone log. What, in summary form (bullet points are fine), is the other fresh evidence or potential grounds for appeal? Can a copy of the documents/information be viewed online?
If anybody can help, that would be appreciated.
But Bambers conviction won't get over turned on a technicality.
There's no one who can help you or Bamber answer your questions the way you want them answered.
The plausible deniability to which you allude may well always be there for some but that's all it ever will be.
The Bamber case isn't the best example to use if you are "stress testing" the criminal justice system IMO.
You would be better off looking at and concentrating on cases like the Birmingham 6, where there is a clear miscarriage of justice.
Is the Bamber conviction legally safe? Yes! Without doubt! Of course if you ask your question to one of his supporters you will get a different answer. The problem you face however is that there aren't many genuine supporters left. By genuine I mean those people who are prepared to put their name and reputation on the line no matter the consequences.
Samson thinks Holly is doing "gods work" on behalf of Bamber but the pair of them remain annonymous- as they are entitled to do. By remaining annonymous however it suggests they aren't as confident as they may appear on Internet forums and with what they post.
Remember this:
At Jeremy Bamber's trial, the judge in his summing up directed the jury to three crucial questions...
1. Did they believe Julie Mugford or Jeremy Bamber?
2. Did they believe that Nevill Bamber had made a phone call to his son Jeremy in the early hours.
3. And were they sure that Sheila did not kill the others before committing suicide and in particular did they believe a silencer was used?
If so they could conclude Jeremy was guilty.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=29.msg3857#msg3857