That is an interesting one, Sadie.
I have followed the link to Martin Grime's R ... I ... GATORY statement and got right there.
When I have substituted the O with an I on other rogatory statements ... I get a 404 message telling me
"To find the page you requested Click onto link below.
It will help you find the page that you may be looking for.
SITE MAP"
As you have said ... mistype an address and you will get nowhere ... so I guess this must be the one which is the exception that proves the rule.
Thanks for looking, Brietta.
When on pfa2 it happened several times that the addresses were mistyped deliberately.
I put up Youtube videos that worked ... and when I came back to play them again they would not open.
Same with webpages. Someone was hiding things by altering the address. Just one full stop did it.
or,
Sometimes the Youtube address had the underlining partially removed. Then it would not open.
Cath, pointed out that the correct address, which I had posted, had had a full stop added ... and that was why they didn't work. It was deliberate.
It kept happening.
Sheer deceit and fraudulence. Chicanory.
Also in response to one of my posts, a freind had posted an image of Joana Cipriana.
When I went back days later, that had become an image of a very busty prostituty type of woman in a suggestive sort of top. My friend was furious and upset. I was too.
I will be totally brutal and honest.
With this name and the importance of Gerry being blamed to some, I am actually wondering if this R
IGATORY statement is fraudulent. I am wondering if the true R
OGATORY statement has somehow been deleted or hidden/locked.
I also wonder is Processos 807-808 also fraudulent? It changes [IIRC] 5 items of information, giving certain incorrect info. and over-ruling the intial Processos 809, which was written on site in Porto. Where it all happened.
To my mind, Processos 807-808 actually takes the readers / investigators eye away from what actually happened. Is it a Red Herring?