Amaral and the dogs

[Alice Purjorick]

So we are all agreed, Kate did not come into contact with any bodies prior to going to PdL?

Seems likely she didn't.

[mercury]

So we are all agreed, Kate did not come into contact with any bodies prior to going to PdL?

no one can answer that, we have anecdotal evidence that a mention was made,(some say it's a vicious lie - but why would it be a vicious lie hmm)  she has stayed silent on the issue for some reason, so who knows?

[Mr Gray]

Seems likely she didn't.

could be either way...very unlikely to have come into contact with 6...but of course there is no evidence she made that claim...but the sceptics don't seem concerned with the evidence

[Anna]

Please try and get back to the topic of the thread. Without insults and goading. Thanks

[mercury]

rather than ask me to do it why don't you just include it in your own post

Wasn't asking you anythng sunshne...why don't you concentrate on your problem as to why a cadaver dog alerted in a flat where a missing child was last seen, your super duper brain should cre up with relevant possibilities

[Mr Gray]

Wasn't asking you anythng sunshne...why don't you concentrate on your problem as to why a cadaver dog alerted in a flat where a missing child was last seen, your super duper brain should cre up with relevant possibilities

I don't have a problem re the dogs...the alerts have no evidential reliability....according to the experts...ie the alerts are BS ...so much so that everyone who knows anything believes that Maddie may still be alive

[Mr Gray]

Nope, not having non existent corroboration for remnant scent of death can't be called BS, only your posts can be called that, try exercising the grey matter a little, it might help

that would be described as a quadruple negative and like most of your posts makes no sense...lets keep this simple....
what do you think the alerts tell us

[mercury]

that would be described as a quadruple negative and like most of your posts makes no sense...lets keep this simple....
what do you think the alerts tell us

Nope, it is a fact there is no corroboration for remnant death scent picked up by dogs (barring confessions, remains found later which are linked back etc)

So yes let's keep it simple

[Mr Gray]

Nope, it is a fact there is no corroboration for remnant death scent picked up by dogs (barring confessions, remains found later which are linked back etc)

So yes let's keep it simple

you are talking utter **...remains found later...so remains are going to be found later...cite please *&*%£ *&*%£ *&*%£

[mercury]

you are talking utter **...remains found later...so remains are going to be found later...cite please *&*%£ *&*%£ *&*%£

I've always wondered what the problem is with yiu when you reply to a post, then you reply to the same post a second time stead of editing your first reply, oh well, enjoy you're psycopathic seeming writhing, Tara for now

Oh and YES remains HAVE BEEN FOUND LATER that WERE at the place a CADAVER dog alerted to.... >>>>>>>

[Eleanor]

All future Off Topic and Insulting Posts will be deleted.

[misty]

I've always wondered what the problem is with yiu when you reply to a post, then you reply to the same post a second time stead of editing your first reply, oh well, enjoy you're psycopathic seeming writhing, Tara for now

Oh and YES remains HAVE BEEN FOUND LATER that WERE at the place a CADAVER dog alerted to.... >>>>>>>

Given the number of places the cadaver dogs apparently alerted, I would think the likelihood of a cadaver having been there at some time during the last 100 years would be significantly higher than average.

[mercury]

Given the number of places the cadaver dogs apparently alerted, I would think the likelihood of a cadaver having been there at some time during the last 100 years would be significantly higher than average.

That's fine you're allowed to be deluded brainwashed biased or influenced

Fact = Only place a cadaver dog alerted was last place a child was seen...YOUR problem....nite nite

[misty]

That's fine you're allowed to be deluded brainwashed biased or influenced

Fact = Only place a cadaver dog alerted was last place a child was seen...YOUR problem....nite nite

Madeleine was not last seen in the flower bed, the wardrobe or behind the sofa in 5a, nor was she seen in the Renault Scenic between 3 & 10 weeks later.

[pegasus]

so amaral got it all wrong...the alerts had no evidential reliability yet he claimed they proved Maddie died in the apartment. Fortunately other members of the PJ thought the alerts were proper BS

The alerts were vauable intelligence Dave1.
It's remarkable thet you dont pick up on this:-
If the clothing was unattended and laying in a wardrobe at the time, the later alert of it in NO WAY implies any guilt whatsoever of the individual person who happened to own the clothes but was 50m away and couldn't even see them, does it?
Are you interested in proving this witness is innocent?  I have just given you a very good argument to prove that point - but you won't be interested. Why not?