Amaral and the dogs

[Eleanor]

Can you cite the evidence for that ?

Oh, you mean they found a Cadaver?  What a silly reply that was.  My reply I mean.  We all know that they didn't. 

But supposing they had done, who could have said who killed the poor child, presuming of course, that she is dead.  Which I am not prepared to believe at the moment.

[stephen25000]

Well Stephen. 

Whilst there is a theoretical possibility that there was a cadaver at the scene which nobody noticed, the chance of that happening are quite low.

So for practical purposes I think it is reasonable to assume that there was no cadaver at the time of the searches.

Will that do you?

I wasn't talking in reference to the time of the searches.

I was referring to the residual compounds that would be present and could do so for extensive periods of time. I did not state a body was present when the dogs were deployed.

Will that do for you too ?

[stephen25000]

Oh, you mean they found a Cadaver?  What a silly reply that was.  My reply I mean.  We all know that they didn't. 

But supposing they had done, who could have said who killed the poor child, presuming of course, that she is dead.  Which I am not prepared to believe at the moment.

Personally i don't believe she was murdered.

Others do, so that is their prerogative.

'We all know that they didn't.'.

Well yes a body hasn't been found, but then i wasn't referring to a body, was I ?

[ShiningInLuz]

Was that tens of millions of years later  ?

Perhaps you would like to see their feathers as well.

I have seen the feathers of both the 'original' dinosaurs and their modern equivalent.  I take it that you have seen these also.

T'was just a post that made me chuckle.

[Anna]

Can we please get back on topic. thanks

[Mr Gray]

I wasn't talking in reference to the time of the searches.

I was referring to the residual compounds that would be present and could do so for extensive periods of time. I did not state a body was present when the dogs were deployed.

Will that do for you too ?

no residual compounds were detected......

[stephen25000]

no residual compounds were detected......

The dogs indicated.

So there were residual compounds.

[ferryman]

The dogs indicated.

So there were residual compounds.

The dog only indicated to cuddle-cat second time of asking.

So was that residual compounds?

Or an error by the dog?

And the dog only barked in an area where they were clothes after they had been been transported to a different location, never while they were in the villa (where Eddie also inspected).

So is that residual compounds?

Or an error by the dog?

And (in each case) if the latter, which error, of indicating when he shouldn't?

OR of failing to indicate when he should have?

[Brietta]

The dogs indicated.

So there were residual compounds.

The dogs were a huge success in locating some obscure spots of blood and cellular material which must have contained blood.  Unfortunately they were less successful in finding any trace of Madeleine McCann either dead or alive.

[Mr Gray]

The dogs indicated.

So there were residual compounds.

not necesarily

[stephen25000]

The dogs were a huge success in locating some obscure spots of blood and cellular material which must have contained blood.  Unfortunately they were less successful in finding any trace of Madeleine McCann either dead or alive.

The forensic analysis was inconclusive as to whether her genetic material from her was found.

[ferryman]

The forensic analysis was inconclusive as to whether her genetic material from her was found.

The recorded results were also inconclusive: no reaction to cuddle-cat first time, (apparent) "reaction" second time; no reaction to clothing in the villa, (apparent!) "reaction" to the same clothing second time in the gym.  (If a dog picking stuff up in its mouth it has first trampled all over can be counted as a "reaction") ...

[stephen25000]

The recorded results were also inconclusive: no reaction to cuddle-cat first time, (apparent) "reaction" second time; no reaction to clothing in the villa, (apparent!) "reaction" to the same clothing second time in the gym.  (If a dog picking stuff up in its mouth it has first trampled all over can be counted as a "reaction") ...

A brief reminder if needed.

Inconclusive is not a negative.

[Mr Gray]

A brief reminder if needed.

Inconclusive is not a negative.

but it is useless as any type of evidence

[ferryman]

but it is useless as any type of evidence

True.

But Stephen will get upset if you say things like that ...