I am bringing this news article here.... I cannot think of any good reason why DCI Phil Jones said what he did to the media after the trial.... I will quote:..
DCI Jones said Tabak was under police suspicion within 10 days of Joanna’s body being found on Christmas morning.
What happened to make DCI Phil Jones suspicious of Dr Vincent Tabak ??? No only that, but within 10 days of Joanna Yeates body being found....
That is one hell of an admission for him to make when there is NO evidence linking Dr Vincent Tabak to anything by the 4th January 2011
DCI Phil Jones is on record stating that it was the DNA that lead to Dr Vincent Tabak being arrested and the DNA wasn't concluded until around the 20th January 2011.... This he state on the "Judge Rinder ~Program about Joanna Yeates ....
In the :Judge Rinder Program" about the "Murder of "Joanna Yeates" DCI PHIL JONES Says: At 31:25 mins:
It was around the 20th January, that erm... we positively identified there were components in the mixed DNA.. of Vincent Tabak
So... why was Dr Vincent Tabak under suspicion within 10 days of Joanna Yeates body being found ??
First we have to remember
The Bay Window... That the Forensic team worked tireless upon The window on the 24th December 2010....
Again I have to ask is that Joanna Yeates
Bay window???
Because if DCI Phil Jones is saying within 10 days of her being found... did they find Joanna Yeates before the 25th December 2010... for the
Bay Window to be examined???? But if DCI says within 10 days of Christmas Morning , then it still leaves the question of the
Bay Window Examination wide Open... (IMO)...
So what has happened in the 10 days from Joanna Yeates body Officially being discovered ????
At this juncture we need to remember that Dr Vincent Tabak is away for the Christmas period.... We also have to remember that The head of The Complex Crime Unit was approached about Dr Vincent Tabak in late December... Ann Reddrop says this in her statement to the press... So we can literally discount the whole of January, that Dr Vincent Tabak was under suspicion.... So that leaves us with 6 days....
Here is the transcript of what Ann Reddrop says to The TV camera's after The Trial...
Vincent Tabak was a cunning, dishonest and manipulative man who knew exactly what he was (deali) doing when he killed Joanna Yeates... Today he has been convicted by a jury of her murder last year, despite claiming he meant her know harm.. he was cunning and dishonest towards his girlfriend, with whom he had maintained a normal relationship.. Even going as far as to text her shortly after jo was dead to say he was bored..
He manipulated the Police by virtue of his Indepth research on the internet.. to keep one step ahead of the Investigation, before his arrest, looking up extradition and medical details of decomposition.. he made very selective admissions surrounding the circumstances of Jo's death which sought to cast herin an Unfavourable light... And he kept this up even when he gave Evidence to the Jury...
Tabak thought his cleverness and deceit would prevent him from being convicted of a brutal murder............. He was wrong!
Jo went missing on Friday 17th December last year after meeting with friends for a drink.. For several days the Police mounted a "Missing Person Inquiry", but with the discovery of her body on Christmas Morning, this became a "Murder Investigation...
Late in December the Police ask for assistance and guidance from The Crown Prosecution Service.. That assistance has come from "The South West Case Work Unit" based here in Bristol... I reviewed the Evidence and Advised that Vincet Tabak should be charged with this murder and began preparing this case for trial... In May this year Tabak admitted Jo's Manslaughter....but that was only part of it..
The Crowns Case is... and always has been that it was a deliberate action on his part.. And "That|is why we refused to accept his plea for Manslaughter"... and he faced trial for "Murder"o over the past 4 weeks....
Jo's family have been here in Bristol, during the trial and have listened to much of the evidence... Our thoughts are with them and with her partner Greg today as Tabak begin's a life sentence for "Murdering" Jo...
We have to remember that DC Karen Thomas flew out to Holland to Interview Dr Vincent Tabak about his statement regarding CJ's Car..... On the 31st December 2010....
I'm sorry if you don't agree, But... There has to be more to that Interview than feeling the need for a trip to Holland to gain a basic statement from Dr Vincent Tabak.... Not forgetting Tanja Morson, who also had spoken about the car...
So is DCI Phil Jones openly admitting that Dr Vincent Tabak was a "SUSPECT" when they took a trip to Holland to Interview him for 6 hours...??? which I will repeat.. Is the length of time Dutch Law allows for a "SUSPECT" to be Interviewed.... Which at that point you either release or charge said "SUSPECT"...
Again we have to come to the conclusion... Dr Vincent Tabak was
Not Cautioned at this Interview...
DC Karen Thomas will have us believe that it was "This Interview" that prompted her suspicions.... And not the fact that they already suspected Dr Vincent Tabak.....
Well DC Karen Thomas... I simply don't believe you !!!! Was DCI Joe Goff in tow with you when you went to Holland ??
Anyone with an ounce of sense knows that the Police would not fly over to Holland, to Interview Dr vincent Tabak with regards CJ's car moving.... It's nonsense... They could wait for him to return from Holland and take Dr Vincent Tabak's statement then.... He returned on the 2nd January 2011...
Dr Vincent Tabak's statement would make NO DIFFERENCE to whether they charged CJ or NOT!!!
CJ moving his car doesn't prove anything.....
So we must conclude (IMO)... That Dr Vincent Tabak was
A Suspect before he went to Holland.... And The Police Interview that took place there was done Illegally....(IMO)...
So what do we have ???
We know DC Karen Thomas called Dr Vincent Tabak on Christmas Eve... But this is before she is discovered...
Did the Police Enter Dr Vincent Tabak's Property before he was charged ???? Did the Police believe that they found something or saw something in Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat????
Did Dr Vincent Tabak leave his laptop behind and the Police found The Porn they have talked about..... What was it that made Dr Vincent Tabak a "SUSPECT before he was in Holland ????? If that was the case , that would be an illegal search.... But I'm not sure that they did this.... It's very possible... They had free rain in that building to do whatever they wanted... no-one was there to stop them...
Another possibility is that they did indeed search Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat and The Trainers that DCI Phil Jones says that they found under the sink, were in Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat.....
He added: “There were a pair of trainers which we found in Mr Jefferies’ house which were hidden underneath a kitchen unit, behind a kick board. Those trainers had a blood spot on them, that was initially analysed… eventually a DNA profile was found and Mr Jefferies could be eliminated.”
Is DCI Phil Jones admitting to illegally searching Dr Vincent Tabak's flat whilst he was away for The Christmas period???? It is not beyond the realms of possibility... as we can clearly see The Forensic Officers working on the outside of the
Bay Window On the 24th December 2010...
The trainers were never brought to court as evidence !!
If it is NOT The Trainers and an illegal search we are left with the option of "
The Sobbing Girl"... The girl who brings to a head the arrest of Dr Vincent Tabak....
The Police pretend it was the Holland Interview... But something more serious had to prompt them to Interview him Holland other than the position of a car changing.... (IMO)...
There needs to be some kind of Information about Dr Vincent Tabak, that prompted the Police to fly to Holland ....(IMO)...
So when did
The Sobbing Girl actually ring the Police ???? It has to be extremely early in The Investigation.... It has to be within a day or so.... (IMO)...
She has to be
The Witness... But what did she say????
I believe she pointed the finger at someone within that building.... It has to be that ...(IMO)... There is no other conceivable reason that the Police concentrate all there efforts on that building and nothing else... They hanker down on that building and never shift from it.... Not even bothering to test males that Joanna Yeates had been in contact with ....
So... did
The Sobbing Girl ring because she was there ??? Did she ring because she knew something about someone in The Building or someone connected to that building.... Was her call just bits of Information, But she mentions the building????
The Sobbing Girl I believe is of Importance... I believe that the Police just used her later on in the Investigation... I believe her existence was know to the Police for a long time.... And They carefully orchestrated the "Yeates appeal 2 days before Dr Vincent Tabak's arrest... And then used
The Sobbing Girl to bolster the arrest in the minds of the public....
They needed to arrest Their 'Prime Suspect" before the review.... They needed to make sure that they could hold him without anyone causing a fuss... And a public was already baying for blood at this time.... And the idea that 'A Girl " had called The Police
AFTER (so they say).. The Yeates appeal.. only secured in peoples mind that there must be some evidence on Dr Vincent Tabak for them to arrest him....
DCI Phil Jones is basically discounting the DNA evidence (IMO).... That was there for the CSI fans... Everyone likes a good bit of DNA... But it wasn't the DNA that was the reason that Dr Vincent Tabak was a "SUSPECT"... It can't have been....
He has to be a "SUSPECT" before they fly out to Holland ....(IMO)... And for them to be testing
The Bay Window even before Joanna Yeates was discovered on Longwood lane.. The Police had to have been given Information, either about the building or Dr Vincent Tabak directly....
I am staying with it was someone in that building..... That is why I believe they jumped on CJ as soon as he called them on the 29th December 2010, with his enhanced statement....
They must have had theories abound as to how Joanna Yeates made it home yet, was removed from her flat without being dragged... And no forced entry.... So the obvious conclusion they came up with is that The Landlord had keys... But they know he is too frail to manage this on his own so must have had assistance....
Stage left... The Placid Dutchman.... CJ speak positively about him , they get on well... The Police jump to conclusions....
I believe
The Sobbing Girl was a viable witness... But what did she see... what did she hear ???
She heard something that made her call The Police in the first place... And i do not believe that it is after The Yeates make their appeal on The 18th January 2011... I believe she called them within days of Joanna Yeates disappearance...
Maybe she called after DS Mark Saunders appeal and the original appeal by The Yeates family.... because the Police wouldn't be lying if they said it was after The Yeates Appeal.... They just didn't tell us which appeal that she rang after ....(IMO)...
So we are talking around the 22nd December 2010.... And the Polices actions support this .... They have an Incident Room parked outside 44, Canygne Road by this time ... (IMO)...
Maybe we need to look at the Polices actions in context of
The Sobbing Girl calling much sooner and work out from there , what Information the Police give to the public and what visual aids The Police use at various times to let The Killer Know that they are watching them .....
I will say again that
The Sobbing Girl did not directly identify Dr Vincent Tabak.... she can't of done, because if this was the case then her statement would have been used at trial to bury Dr Vincent Tabak... And by the time of Dr Vincent Tabak's trial...
The Sobbing Girl is a distant memory in The minds of the general public....
We are now told of salacious details and Internet searches , that takes our concentration away from the real facts about this case... Because everyones ready to hang The Dutchman, whether he did it or not... People just want vengeance and not Justice..... (IMO).....
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/280447/Shame-Vincent-Tabak-cannot-hang-for-Jo-Yeates-murder-say-parentshttp://hackinginquiry.org/leveson-inquiry/avon-and-somerset-police-chief-denies-mirror-claims-over-police-briefings/
