Interesting Scipio. I have to say your in depth study of the Bamber case is impressive; far more detailed about the case than me and I have followed it since the day Bamber killed them all! No one will forget Bamber being exposed for trying to sell porn photos of 'Bambi' to the gutter press; it was huge news at the time and after that no one was surprised when he was convicted!
So Scipio how come you haven't commented upon the 911 threads? I originally thought the 'truthers' were all nutjobs but I have been converted and now I am convinced it is all one big lie. Have a look at this video, maybe this very high ranking US officer might get you wondering? (20 mins.)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LBRASvv471A
I used to comment and debate 911 back in the day. There is little point today because it is known that 911 truthers are crackpots peddling nonsense.
You might like to know that Stubbelbine retred fromt he Army in 1984, has dementia and is nuts so posting a video from him is not of much value. He was not anywhere near the Pentagon at the time of the attack and had no government contacts. In fact many truthers insist he is a plant to discredit them. He is on video saying crazy things like that he believes people can walk through walls though and do all sorts of things with our minds like bend objects. He has a history of making ridiculous claims including passing himself off as an expert in food standards.
His claims in relation to 911 are all nonsense and he has no proof of any kind to support any of his claims. But even worse just look at the inconsistency of his claims:
“Later I saw another photograph taken by one of the sensors on the outside of the Pentagon. Now, all of the sensors had been turned off, which is kind of interesting – isn’t it? That day, why would all of the sensors around the Pentagon be turned off?"
So he claims all the sensors were turned off yet contradicts himself saying a sensor took a photo. Did he have access to any information that the public at large did not have? No he was out of the military a long time and had no access at all to any government records only the same reports released to the public.
“In the hole, however, was a turbine that looked like a turbine from the missile… I can’t prove that, I don’t know. But there was something there that did not look like the engine from an airplane, but did look like a turbine from a missile.”
It was documented to be an engine from an airplane. The damage to the Pentagon is fully consistent with damage from an airplane. Wings shred when they strike an object like the Pentagon. There is nothing at all surprising that the wings shredded and did not make a hole that is shaped exactly like an airplane. Since he offers no evidence of any kind to back up his claims and just makes wild assertions there is not really much of a need to bother to address all of his claims. His claims of the radar system being turned off is nonsense.
911 conspiracy theorists claims have been so discredited there is little need to even bother refuting them anymore and can simply be refuted by posting debunking done by others.
For instance, here is something that refutes the babble usually cited about anti-aircraft batteries at the Pentagon in 2001:
http://www.jod911.com/There_Are_No_Missile_Defenses_at_the_Pentagon.pdf
