Defence Counsel: Can you look at item where you sent message to Tanja ‘missing you’
Can you remember if you sent it before you decided to go to Asda.
Recapping- you come off the Internet at 7.37pm (our entry 47) & remain in your flat until
9.29pm (our entry 88).
How soon before that did you left your flat?
The searches are NOT Dr Vincent Tabak's!! I've always said this... Now I am questioning what was said at trial....
I couldn't understand how Clegg had anything to refer too with regards any timings for what Dr Vincent Tabak did...
This has to be from something else... maybe an interview with someone....
If Dr Vincent Tabak didn't say anything to his Lawyer and all they had was an enhanced statement, how did they know that Dr Vincent Tabak stayed in his flat until 9:29pm???
I could never understand this... From 7:37pm until 9:29pm.. Dr Vincent Tabak... according to the Defences timeline, was in his Flat... Obviously proving he didn't go around to Flat 1 , when they said he did...
But it cannot be an account of Dr Vincent Tabak's movement on that day... As Dr Vincent Tabak remained silent throughout.. And only signing an enhanced statement in September....
So Clegg had to get this information from somewhere..... Just like the searches are not Dr Vincent Tabak's (imo).. I don't believe the account of his movements are his either...
Why is Dr Vincent Tabak suddenly going to come up with some random statements that don't make sense, without anyone to verify them...
Clegg should have had access to Dr Vincent Tabak, computer, but I don't think he did.... Where has this information come from??
If Clegg had spent the time checking everything that Dr Vincent Tabak had done over that weekend, He would have known that Dr Vincent Tabak was still in his Flat till 9:29pm and didn't move... He would have argued that point to the bitter end....
Proving his Client was at home when Joanna Yeates was killed But he didn't!
I had just assumed Clegg must have had some evidence that Dr Vincent Tabak was in his Flat until 9:29pm on that Friday... But what evidence could that have possibly have been...
He has already said that he came off the Internet, so it cannot be that which puts Dr Vincent Tabak in his Flat until 9:29pm.... And him saying he was watching TV without knowing what he was watching, it can't be that either....
I remember DCI phil Jones saying that Dr Vincent Tabak would only talk about the phone... So the police in their Interviews didn't get any change from Dr Vincent Tabak...
Yes there is the holland interview.... But Clegg cannot use that as his information for what Dr Vincent Tabak apparently did...And I doubt that he had a copy of DC Karen Thomas Interview.. Also within this Holland Interview, how do we know what Dr Vincent Tabak was supposed to have said??? Did he actually speak?? Did we ever see any evidence from DC Karen Thomas of what Dr Vincent Tabak did or said in this 6 hour Holland Interview?? No... does she refer to her notes in court??? Not that I know of.....
This whole case is odd.... Why would Dr Vincent Tabak talk to DC Karen Thomas for 6 hours in Holland yet when he has been arrested he say absolutely nothing.....
His freedom is on the line and for 10 months he doesn't speak... until he is at trial.... So I cannot see that the Holland Interview had reams of info either... I think the Holland Interview is a smoke screen...
Where has the Information come from that is used at Dr Vincent Tabak's trial????
We have no corroborating independent witness's to say anything as far as Dr Vincent Tabak is concerned...
Tanja at the very least should have been there at trial... but she wasn't, and the reason I believe she wasn't was so she didn't perjure herself...
This line... again doesn't make sense ...
Defence Counsel: At our timeline 100, you sent a text message to Tanja ‘How are you? I
am at Asda. Buying some crisis.’ How did you feel?
Tabak: I just wanted to hear her voice; to get support and comfort.
Dr Vincent Tabak has sent a text message... Yet it talks of him wanting to hear her voice.... That sounds like a phone call... What it reminded me of was someone ringing and it going to voicemail...
There you would here someones voice... But for Dr Vincent Tabak it doesn't make sense ..as he didn't ring Tanja he was supposed to have text her....
So who or what wanted to hear her voice ??? and who's voice are they talking about???
We have to go back to the 1300 page document.... If Clegg appeared surprised about the contents of this document when it was presented to him at the court on the 7th October 2011 , if I remember correctly, that tells me he didn't investigate anything to do with this case...
There literally should have not been any surprises from that document for him... He should have been aware what exactly was on Dr Vincent Tabak's computer and what exactly was on Dr Vincent Tabak's phone.
I still do not understand where Clegg got his Information about his client Dr Vincent Tabak, when Dr Vincent Tabak didn't say anything before trial.... And Clegg obviously didn't do anything to help his client as he demonstrated in court...
That information had to belong to somebody... but I am sure that it didn't belong to Dr Vincent Tabak..(imo)
http://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf