At Line 267 of the prosecution chart
at 15.00 pm on 21 December 2010, Tabak searched the words
‘Extradition of Dutchman’
‘Jo Yeates’
At Line 271 of the prosecution chart
Tabak searched the Dutch word
‘doodslag’ (English meaning: ‘manslaughter’)
If as I believe that these are not the searches of Dr Vincent Tabak, they have to be someone else's.... There has to be some basis of truth that is hidden between the lines....
I thought that they had been invented at first to be honest, when I say that I mean once Dr Vincent Tabak was in custody... That still could be the case... But I have another thought...
If these searches belong to the person who killed Joanna Yeates , then it displays the early intension of implicating Dr Vincent Tabak from early on in the Investigation....
I know we have heard talk that Dr Vincent Tabak was told by Joanna Yeates that she was at home alone that evening... But did anyone know that applied to Dr Vincent Tabak that evening also???
Someone would need to know that information (imo)
The date of the searches has always concerned me... Not only that but the lack of Dutch.... We have very few Dutch references, I'll deal with this one first...
The date is the 21st December 2010 at 3:00pm, I noticed something else... which I will come back too....
"Doodslag"... That old favourite.... The word that says it all..... Now if someone is trying to stitch Dr Vincent Tabak up, it had to start early on.... Curiosity.... whatever, But someone deliberately looked up the word "Doodslag" And it wasn't Dr Vincent Tabak (imo)... It is the answer you would get if you looked up on an English google search what is the Dutch word for Manslaughter... And it would of course give you the answer of Doodslag...
So when our Perfect Pointer of Powerpoint was Pointing... she had been looking at a computer that had this information already there, But it wasn't Dr Vincent Tabak's computer (imo)...
Why would Dr Vincent Tabak be checking about understanding what the word "Doodslag" meant if he already knew ???
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work that out... But the use and staging of the searches, helped everyone believe that it indeed was the work of The Placid Dutchman...
The previous search...
At Line 258 (afternoon- at work)
Tabak performed Google searches on the words
‘manslaughter’
‘previous offenders’
‘Maximum sentence Manslaughter’
Tabak then performed a Yahoo search for the words
‘penalty for manslaughter’
When has Dr Vincent Tabak got the time to be doing all these searches at work???? And why on the 21st December would Dr Vincent Tabak be searching for "Maximum Sentence for Manslaughter"... When at this time Joanna Yeates was still a "Missing person"?? Nothing had been determined as to how she had died...
They keep saying only the killer would know this... only the killer would know that.... . And I say only the killer would not know any Dutch... But use google to help with the translation ....
So I glean from this that "The Killer"
Has got prior Offences, maybe more than a Parking Ticket, The Killer was trying to see what the likely sentence would be if he was actually arrested for this crime,You see the searches have to be The killers..(imo) That is all I can think of... That makes sense... And I do Not go with the searches being Dr Vincent Tabak's.. I never have....
On the 21st December 2010 why would anyone want to be checking about "Manslaughter" when the cause of death hadn't been determined, couldn't be determined , because Joanna Yeates hadn't been found"....
And would stupidly use only one Dutch word "Doodslag", because anyone who knew someone who was Dutch would be aware as my Dutchie told me ..."We Dutchies google in Dutch"... Only someone who was trying to implicate the Dutchman, would throw in that one word.... Because in their mind that one word said it all..."MANSLAUGHTER"....
But they forgot... Thee Placid Dutchman didn't know English Law.... why would he ??? So to even start looking up the word "Doodslag" Would he have needed to look up English Law first???
At Line 225 (sic)
Tabak searched using the words
‘Joanna Yeates’
‘Salt supplies in the Netherlands’
This particular search has always struck me as odd.... Dr Vincent Tabak doesn't need to know anything about "Salt Supplies in the Netherlands"... But if someone is trying to incriminate Dr Vincent Tabak, it almost sound plausible....
Why would Dr Vincent Tabak need Salt supplies in the Netherlands.. when he's apparently popped to ASDA for some Rock Salt!!!!! Maybe someone else popped to ASDA for some ~Rock Salt.... (IMO)...
Again I believe it has to be the person it really applies too, because only they would know that "Rock Salt" and the purchase of Rock Salt was of importance......
At Line 267 of the prosecution chart
at 15.00 pm on 21 December 2010, Tabak searched the words
‘Extradition of Dutchman’
‘Jo Yeates
Another indication in my mind that someone was trying to implicate Dr Vincent Tabak as early as 21st December is "Extradition of Dutchman"... why would Dr Vincent Tabak be looking on an English Google engine for what happens to "Dutch Nationals"... Surely he would have looked on a Dutch website, and being a Dutch National the words "Dutchman" wouldn't even come into it.... Funnily enough he is a Dutch National!!!!! I think this is a flaw, in the person mind, who is trying to implicate the Dutchman.... And as Dr Vincent Tabak is Dutch, he wouldn't need to emphasise the word "Dutchman"... (imo)
If Dr Vincent Tabak was going to flee he wouldn't have returned after his festive break with his family... He would have come up with various reasons not to return to England....(imo)...
So I believe that it was someone else that searched for the Extradition of a Dutchman, in their attempt to implicate him....
Also within that comment i did notice something else that had slipped me by....
Jo Yeates
Well, well well,.... I do not believe that Joanna Yeates was referred to as Jo Yeates in the media as early as the 21st December 2010.... And that search has to be very telling indeed....
The Article I have found when her mother says her firends call her Jo... is dated 24th December 2010
Mrs Yeates, 58, said her daughter, known as Jo to her friends, had recently moved into a flat with her boyfriend and had been looking forward to a party they were holding for friends on Tuesday.
And as Dr Vincent Tabak didn't know Joanna yeates, he to wouldn't refer to her as "Jo".. (IMO)
I do not believe that there was anything in the media by the 21st December 2010 that referred to Joanna Yeates as "Jo"...
The helpfindJo wordpress didn't take shape until the 22nd December 2010... So obviously the information cannot have come from there ....
And as there is nothing from Dr Vincent Tabak's facebook account , we cannot see if he got the information from there either.... In fact I find that weird as well... Why haven't they got Dr Vincent Tabak's Facebook account, as part of this 'Trial Evidence"....????? Another piece of Evidence "Missing " from the Trial....
Therefore I believe it had to be someone who knew Joanna Yeates well enough to search for information on her disappearance using the words "Jo Yeates" and not Joanna Yeates, as I believe it was a while before, she became known to the public as "Jo"....
It has to be someone who know Joanna Yeates (imo) and I do not know How many People the Police Interviewed or checked, during there Investigations that would know Joanna yeates well enough to refer to her as simply "Jo"...
And as i know Dr vincent Tabak didn't "Know " Joanna Yeates, he would only search for her in terms that the public at large did... and put her full name into the search engine.....(imo)
Dr Vincent Tabak didn't do these searches as I have said many many times before.... maybe it was the killer who did???? (imo)..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1341452/Jo-Yeates-murder-Police-search-missing-architect-finds-womans-body.html#ixzz4wvHWgFEWhttp://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf[attachment deleted by admin]