But Jeremy Bamber IS a psychopath — he’s been diagnosed.
Even the psychiatrist his defence team brought in to assess him had to give the “disappointing “ news to him that they couldn’t use the psychiatrist’s assessment in court, as he TOO classified Jeremy as a psychopath.
I’m not interested in whether people like you believe me or not, Ag, because I don’t think you’re rational. I’ve spotted your discrepancies more times than I can count, and I’m not convinced you have twin sons. I suspect you’ve made that up. I think somewhere in that mind of yours, your misguided admiration for Jeremy goes far deeper than you realise, and it’s actually Sheila who you hold in esteem. The tragic beauty with twin boys — gunned down by her own brother — your fixation lies more with her.
What year did you give birth to your twin boys, Ag? Hmm?
D'you know, something, Spy? When it comes to passion and enthusiasm, I see little -if ANY- difference between you and Auntie A. and when I read some of your obnoxious posts, I almost feel ashamed to be on the same side as you! You frequently and happily accuse "Ag" of lying, but guess what, I imagine huge swathes of your posts are embroidered prior to your embellishment of them. An immediate ie is your recent claim that a psychiatrist bought in to assess him had to apologize to him for not being able to use the assessment in court? Is that so? You know this psychiatrist personally, do you? Along with all the other characters you use to back up some of your preposterous claims and spoutings? Is there NOTHING about this case you don't claim to have expert -indeed, INSIDE- knowledge of? It seems not. It appears you can back up everything you claim -or so you say- but, as yet, you've provided no proof of ANY of what you say. You claim to have hundreds -maybe thousands?- of documents which will take you too long to trawl through to fine the evidence you're asked to provide, but you appear to have a photographic memory when it comes to quoting them. Other than your hobby appearing to be hatred of Jeremy, why would you need all the documents you claim to have? One can be forgiven, having heard this mantra repeated so many times, for believing that you make a wild claim and hope it will be substantiated by saying you can back it up.
Frankly, I don't know why you're here. You clearly, from all the hints you drop of having inside information -and knowing every fly which farted in connection with it- wish us to believe you have superior/inside/personal knowledge of the case. I wonder, do you need to do that simply to uphold any untruths/embellishments you throw out? I wonder, too, what it is you seem to think you're campaigning for? He was convicted and given a minimum term of 25 years, 35 years ago. I, and others who believe his conviction to be safe, accept him as being all those things you say -shout, SPIT- about him. Your rallying cries, so frequently reminiscent of Tom Moseley's anti Jewish/pro Nazi diatribe, can do nothing to change that. Your vitriolic rants can't add any more time to his life means life sentence.
