I have a theory...... (apologies for long post)...
The story repeated on 26th March 2018
It was December 2010 and the holiday season was in full swing.
There was snow on the ground in Bristol in the UK and with Christmas approaching, 25-year-old Jo Yeates was excited about spending time with her boyfriend, Greg Reardon, and her parents, David and Theresa.
Jo and Greg had met at the landscape architecture firm where they both worked and had recently moved in together.
On December 17, Jo and her colleagues finished work for the day and piled into a nearby pub for festive drinks. Greg had gone away for the weekend to visit his brother and Jo told her friends she planned to spend her time baking cakes for a party they were throwing the following Tuesday.
At around 8pm, Jo left the pub and went to a nearby supermarket where she purchased a pizza and two bottles of cider. Then she set off on the 20 minute walk back to her flat.
On 19 December, Greg returned from his trip. Upon entering the house, he found a half drunk bottle of cider on the table beside Jo’s handbag, glasses and keys. His girlfriend was nowhere to be found.
Repeat, repeat . repeat.... It's like a stuck record... There is no more information available the same info goes around and around and around....
When I think of other cases like The Wests for instance , there is a lot of background information available about the Wests... Programs fill us in on every detail of how they came to be the people they were....
But with this case there is nothing.... Zero.....
We have the day that Joanna Yeates went Missing apparently being the 17th December 2010.. We Have Forensic Officers at Canygne Road going round and round doing the same thing for weeks .... We have the trip to the supermarket played out, the CCTV footage having been put through another program to give us a time and date... We still have The Yeates talking about laying a headstone...
Why is everything on repeat??
Where is the detail??
Where are the Interviews? None of her friends have come forward.. There is never any new information...
They start the investigation and treat it as a Murder Inquiry without a proper "Proof of Life Inquiry"... They Interview no-one to establish where she was or had been.... All those people in The Ram and no-one is Interviewed... No direct appeal to anyone whom had been in the supermarkets at the same time as Joanna Yeates to come forward...
They have apparently hundreds of phone calls after appeals on TV, yet they do not follow them up... They can't have done, there too busy getting ready to arrest Dr Vincent Tabak without any evidence...
How can every procedure appear not to be followed, mistake after mistake is made... And no one says anything.... I have said before it is like they are all acting, everyone has a part to play.... I wondered if the trial was a Moot Trial...
AH.. mentioned in a post that the Forensics at Canygne Road looked like they were training...
The Police as AH pointed out look disinterested... Rebecca Scott herself arrives at court dressed like it doesn't matter.... So what was it all about.... A pointless exercise???
At what point did they stop Investigating The Case?? If as AH has suggested that Dr Vincent Tabak is questioned over and over again and then to shut them up he admits Manslaughter, The Investigation into what happened to Joanna Yeates stops....
So... Did Dr Vincent Tabak admit to manslaughter to shut them up in the Holland Interview?? Remember that Interview is 6 hours long.... And 6 hours going around in circles would annoy anyone...
Maybe that is it.... The Holland Interview is where it all changes..... They have NO evidence... they badger Dr Vincent Tabak for hours they come away with a DNA sample that they cannot use.... Or did he even give them a DNA sample?/ We only have their word he did and I do not believe the tripe that has come out of their mouths....
Without following up any leads, and lets face it people were ringing and were following this case from the begining... The Investigation has stalled... They let us know information yet it is not followed up as far as i can see... They cannot connect Dr Vincent Tabak to the Pizza and Note sent to the Ram in late December.. yet we are told of it's existence on the 10th January 2011... The appeal by the Yeates Family on the 18th January 2011 followed by the sobbing girl ringing with information.... Do they not follow up any more leads, is that why they arrest Dr Vincent Tabak on the 20th January 2011??
Do they arrest him because he admitted he had killed her when he was Interviewed in Holland,, halting the Investigation... And any lines of inquiry that the appeals may have brought they ignore?? They were due their review... Would their incompetence been exposed at this point... Did Dr Vincent Tabak unwittingly stop the investigation into Joanna Yeates murder ?? Is this why he apologises to the Yeates in court... because the real killer got away with the crime...
The Police have put away many innocent people .. we know this .. Stefan Kizco is just one example... They like to close cases and appease the public and Innocent Men have had their lives ruined....
The Confession has always played a part in this case.... But which Confession maybe is the key.... The tosh that Brotherton spoke of that tried to implicate Dr Vincent Tabak when he was at Long Lartin.. wasn't good enough to be believed that he was actually admitting to murder... We then get fooled into believing The Plea at The Old Bailey, which again he cannot have been Dr Vincent Tabak there to make this plea.. (I understand where leonora is coming from)
Dr Vincent Tabak as we know never spoke when he was arrested... So the story that we know, where did it come from?? I think it came from Dr Vincent Tabak.... I think it came from The Holland Interview.... I think he gave them a scenario that was NOT possible which is ....."The Admission To Manslaughter"...
The scenario he gave them he knew wasn't true.. (imo) he could prove it wasn't true, that is why he said it... That is why I believe the times do not add up... Why we have NO TimeStamps... Because the time Stamps would prove that Dr Vincent Tabak didn't kill Joanna Yeates... The timings are all wrong... we know they are... The ridiculous idea that he could carry a dead weight so many times on his own, when it would be physically impossible for him to do so.....
They arrest him just before The Crime Watch program is due to air.... So it doesn't add any information that is in the program is with held from the public... We do not know what it may have revealed.... So it appears that they went after Dr Vincent Tabak because he made fools out of them... And once that ball started rolling, it didn't stop......
Dr Vincent Tabak cannot answer over 80 questions, because he didn't kill Joanna Yeates... The s tory that I keep speaking of that was told on the witness stand is just that... A Story... But was it first told in Holland??
Did the Police spend there time trying to tie Dr Vincent Tabak to the murder of Joanna Yeates after The Holland Interview??
There was more circumstancial evidence connecting CJ at the time of his arrest than there was of Dr Vincent Tabak at the time of his arrest.... They do not get any so called evidence from Dr Vincent Tabak until after they have arrested him.... So did they arrest him to teach him a lesson and go with it??
Is the reason that no-one is attending court to give evidence because they don't want to?? CJ.. Tanja Morson the two most important witness's not there... Or was it that they didn't want them to appear in court because it would contradict the story that was said on the stand....
The huge holes in this case are ridiculous... Massive pieces of Information Missing ... Yet they push through a trial and for what ??? He's not guilty... They know he's not guilty....
Who is responsible for Dr Vincent Tabak's incarceration?? What prompted the need to have this trial asap?? There is no evidence gathering for Dr Vincent Tabak as far as I can tell... There can't have been... Tanja Morson at the very least should have taken the stand....
I have gone around and around in circles... It leads nowhere... Nothing changes and it should... Something different should have come to the surface by now and the same old story gets spun....
Why do we not see any programs about him... information about how he was as a youngster like we have seen about The Wests... Information proving he did indeed have relations with ladies of the night... That should be a great news spinner.... But the media say nothing ... It all stopped, even when they did make a couple of programs they were a rehash of each other... The same tail with no real detail...
The Nero cafe CCTV... none of us knew of it's existence until Colin Port spoke of it at The Leveson, the same with The Trainer..... If DCI Phil Jones didn't talk about it then we would not know about it...
But there has to be a reason for this Information being brought to our attention so late in the day... Why did they really keep CJ on bail for so long?? Where there some ranks within the Police hoping that the Case against Dr Vincent Tabak would be dropped... Were they planning to pursue CJ further?? Would Dr Vincent Tabak's admission stop any further Investigations into the Murder of Joanna Yeates...
Were there still Police who believed that CJ was guilty?? It sort of mirrors Colin Stagg in a way.... Arrested as a suspect and vilified in the media... They suggested to us that because of his age and Hardyman living at the same address there had to be a connection to Glenis Caruthers.... And allowed us to believe that a serial killer was in our midst and they have him in their custody... But we know CJ was exhonerated.... And in part I believe that is why Dr Vincent Tabak gets mentioned in July 2011 by the attorney general... If they have one man charged with this offence ... then it in turn makes the other man Not Guity....
But the evidence they had would prove that CJ wasn't guilty... They had tenuous links in the first place as far as CJ was concerned and never strayed from that property... Did the information that Dr Vincent Tabak gave in Holland also exhonerate CJ... Where the timings of what Dr Vincent Tabak said in support of CJ... They knew they had little to nothing on CJ when he was arrested... But i believe some had decided he was guilty... Because in their minds he was....
They were also of the impression that it was at least 2 killers.... had they decided that Dr Vincent Tabak must be CJ's accomplice?? Did he give CJ an alibi?? Was that a reason for going after Dr Vincent Tabak? Was The Holland Interview more to do with them believing Dr Vincent Tabak was a suspect was involved with CJ??
If that was their belief... Then The Holland Interview would go round in circles.... 6 hours of circles making Dr Vincent Tabak completely annoyed with their incompetence... At which point he tells them he did it... And as (AH )has stated.... they are scuppered.... Completely scuppered....
CJ should have been released from bail as soon as they charged Dr Vincent Tabak, but he is NOT... 4th march 2011 is when this actually takes place... I believe that they still had CJ in there sights, because they were blinded to the fact that he had access to these flats and had made a second witness statement... Which drew their attention to him in the first place...
But if Dr Vincent Tabak contradicts their beliefs, they could construe that as they were accomplices.... (imo) CJ has the backing of his solicitors to fight any ridiculous notion put to him.... But Dr Vincent Tabak has blown it..... He's blown it because he has admitted to Manslaughter, and they are not going to let that one go (imo)...
So they go with that idea.... And the case is put forward that he did indeed kill Joanna Yeates... he is indeed an evil man..... And we'll throw in some porn and child porn for good measure....
The Yeates family are none the wiser.... why would they be... They want Justice for their daughter.... The public just want to see someone swing, they are not interested in the truth.... And that is why it is easy to get them to believe the tosh that is stated at trial.... because they want to believe it, whether it is true or not....
I have stated before about the 6 hour Interview in Holland which is the time the Dutch Authorities have in which to charge or release someone... It cannot be coincidence that this Interview was for 6 hours and that Dr Vincent Tabak was being interviewed as a suspect... Why was this Interview conducted at the airport??? Where there any Dutch Authorities present??
If Ann Redrrop had insisted that from late December 2010 they were investigating Dr Vincent Tabak, then I believe that they were investigating him as an accomplice... I believe that information he gave on the phone to DC Karen Thomas around the 23rd December 2010 would support CJ..... The second witness statement was given by CJ on The 22nd December 2010.... is it me or is it just coincidence that DC Karen Thomas decides to ring Dr Vincent Tabak the day after?? Was she confirming what CJ had said in his second witness statement?? Did CJ see Dr Vincent Tabak that evening??
It isn't until they arrest CJ... that Dr Vincent Tabak becomes of Interest in this case.... If Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson were aware that CJ was arrested, then I suggest that they called the Police to help CJ and not to bury CJ...
And there is where it starts.... If that was a detail that they had left out of the interview at the Flat then they could assume he was involved as an accomplice.... And was covering for CJ... So we get them flying out to Holland to Interview Dr Vincent Tabak....he shuts them up by admitting to killing Joanna Yeates because he has had enough of their stupid questions... And lands himself in the middle of a S*** Storm...
Any Circumstantial Evidence can be interpreted in many ways... and I believe that is just what they did... It will make Dr Vincent Tabak look guilty no matter what.... Ignore the evidence.... and where it leads.... Lets satisfy the public that a bad man is locked up...
Does no-one else think that the arrest of Dr Vincent Tabak came too quickly after the arrest of CJ... With nothing pointing to Dr Vincent Tabak whatsoever....
Is the fact that everyone appears to agree that Dr Vincent Tabak admitted manslaughter correct... Are they telling us he really did.... So when i look at that I will say 'Yes"... but the real question has to be,......
When did Dr Vincent Tabak admit that he was guilty of Manslaughter?? And the only time that I can make any sense of is The Holland Interview.... Because I believe that was the only time Dr Vincent Tabak spoke and gave the Police a ridiculous story that he could prove was untrue.... (imo)
https://www.mamamia.com.au/jo-yeates-murder/