The McCann v Gonçalo Amaral libel trial as it happens.

[Mr Gray]

Gonçalo Amaral didn't push Mrs Cipriano down the stairs. He didn't even see someone pushing her down the stairs (see "the staircase" about the result of falling down stairs) without reacting. He didn't torture her nor saw someone do it.
He signed a document he shouldn't have signed without inquiring.
You call that "criminal" because your agenda is to discredit and despise Mr Amaral, just as Mrs McCann did it in her book.
Do you hope that discredit on Mr Amaral will bring Madeleine back ?
Or do you hope discredit will make the Judge order Mr Amaral to pay a lot of money to Madeleine's family ?

first I am not discrediting amaral...hes doing that himself
You need to read the amnesty statement again it didn't say he pushed her down the stairs..it says he lied about it...I prefer to trust the word of amnesty
What I am doing is putting things in context...amaral has a history of lying and therefore his word on other things cannot be trusted

[Mr Gray]

Nope. I referred to the conclusions of the PJ, did I not make that clear?

the archiving report did not agree with the interim report ...

[Montclair]

the archiving report did not agree with the interim report ...

The archiving report did not contradict the interim report either...

[Wonderfulspam]

first I am not discrediting amaral...hes doing that himself
You need to read the amnesty statement again it didn't say he pushed her down the stairs..it says he lied about it...I prefer to trust the word of amnesty
What I am doing is putting things in context...amaral has a history of lying and therefore his word on other things cannot be trusted

What I am doing is explaining once again that

"his word on other things cannot be trusted"

Is your opinion.

[Mr Gray]

The archiving report did not contradict the interim report either...

it actually stated that none of the evidence used to make the MCCaNNS arguidos was found to be valid

[Mr Gray]

What I am doing is explaining once again that

"his word on other things cannot be trusted"

Is your opinion.

no its not...once a witness is found to be lying then his whole testimony is suspect

[Lyall]

it actually stated that none of the evidence used to make the MCCaNNS arguidos was found to be valid

It is a very diplomatic document.

[Wonderfulspam]

no its not...once a witness is found to be lying then his whole testimony is suspect

Did I mention witnesses?

'once a witness is found to be lying then his whole testimony is suspect'

And does that not apply for this...

'they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did'

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id136.html

[Mr Gray]

Did I mention witnesses?

'once a witness is found to be lying then his whole testimony is suspect'

And does that not apply for this...

'they didn't check on them like they afterwards declared they did'

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id136.html

The McCannns have been accused of lying but nothing has been proved

[AnneGuedes]

It is a very diplomatic document.

So diplomatic that it is obvious the PGR spent some time on certain sentences..
But I haven't read there that evidence leading to the request of assistance of a lawyer was found not to be valid. Inconclusive, but valid.

[Mr Gray]

So diplomatic that it is obvious the PGR spent some time on certain sentences..
But I haven't read there that evidence leading to the request of assistance of a lawyer was found not to be valid. Inconclusive, but valid.

no evidence means no evidence..you need to accept it

[AnneGuedes]

no evidence means no evidence..you need to accept it

Will you accept this, from the police of your country ?
"While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance."

[John]

Day-10 Report of events which occurred on the 27th November should be available very shortly.

[Mr Gray]

Will you accept this, from the police of your country ?
"While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance."

 I accept it because it is meaningless and said in a certain context

[Sherlock Holmes]

Day-10 Report of events which occurred on the 27th November should be available very shortly.

Many thanks to all involved. It is very valuable work and much appreciated.