Author Topic: The timeline revisited  (Read 91200 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

The timeline revisited
« on: June 25, 2019, 06:55:08 AM »
Timeline as prepared by the group between 3rd and 10th May.

20:35 McCanns leave 5A and go to Tapas
20:40 Jane Tanner arrives followed by the Oldfields.
20:45 Russell O'Brien arrives
20:55 Matthew Oldfield back to apartments, meets the Payne/Webster on their way down.
21:00 Matt returns to Tapas
21:05 Gerry goes to the apartments.
21:15 Jane goes to the apartments; Gerry is chatting to Jez.
21:20 Jane returns to Tapas (Gerry has returned)
21:25 Matt and Russ go to apartments. Russell stays there.
21:30 Matt checks 5A.
21:35 Matt to Tapas.
21:40 Jane goes to her apartment.
21:45 Russelll to Tapas.
22.00 Kate McCann to apartment.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

In my opinion no-one in their right mind would risk going anywhere near 5A with all that activity going on.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2019, 07:34:43 AM »
Timeline as prepared by the group between 3rd and 10th May.

20:35 McCanns leave 5A and go to Tapas
20:40 Jane Tanner arrives followed by the Oldfields.
20:45 Russell O'Brien arrives
20:55 Matthew Oldfield back to apartments, meets the Payne/Webster on their way down.
21:00 Matt returns to Tapas
21:05 Gerry goes to the apartments.
21:15 Jane goes to the apartments; Gerry is chatting to Jez.
21:20 Jane returns to Tapas (Gerry has returned)
21:25 Matt and Russ go to apartments. Russell stays there.
21:30 Matt checks 5A.
21:35 Matt to Tapas.
21:40 Jane goes to her apartment.
21:45 Russelll to Tapas.
22.00 Kate McCann to apartment.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

In my opinion no-one in their right mind would risk going anywhere near 5A with all that activity going on.

is most of this taken from the twice translated non verbatim statements...if so we cannot be sure of the accuracy

Offline faithlilly

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2019, 07:45:59 AM »
is most of this taken from the twice translated non verbatim statements...if so we cannot be sure of the accuracy

It’s from the timelines written on the night and the one handed in on the 10th, both in english.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2019, 07:49:12 AM »
It’s from the timelines written on the night and the one handed in on the 10th, both in english.

its seems to have far more entries than the written timeline which suggests you are wrong

Offline G-Unit

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2019, 07:52:07 AM »
is most of this taken from the twice translated non verbatim statements...if so we cannot be sure of the accuracy

Clicking on the link provided will tell you what you need to know.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2019, 07:54:06 AM »
Clicking on the link provided will tell you what you need to know.

ive clicked  ...

so no one checked 5a between 9.30 and 10...thats 30 mins...ample time for an abduction

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2019, 07:58:48 AM »
Timeline as prepared by the group between 3rd and 10th May.

20:35 McCanns leave 5A and go to Tapas
20:40 Jane Tanner arrives followed by the Oldfields.
20:45 Russell O'Brien arrives
20:55 Matthew Oldfield back to apartments, meets the Payne/Webster on their way down.
21:00 Matt returns to Tapas
21:05 Gerry goes to the apartments.
21:15 Jane goes to the apartments; Gerry is chatting to Jez.
21:20 Jane returns to Tapas (Gerry has returned)
21:25 Matt and Russ go to apartments. Russell stays there.
21:30 Matt checks 5A.
21:35 Matt to Tapas.
21:40 Jane goes to her apartment.
21:45 Russelll to Tapas.
22.00 Kate McCann to apartment.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIME_LINE_3_MAY_07.htm

In my opinion no-one in their right mind would risk going anywhere near 5A with all that activity going on.
Perhaps she was taken by someone not “in their right mind”? 
But thanks for illustrating the clear window of opportunity between 9.45 and 10pm. .
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Angelo222

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2019, 08:07:12 AM »
is most of this taken from the twice translated non verbatim statements...if so we cannot be sure of the accuracy

I don't believe translating something twice or thrice will confuse any numerical detail.  Good try tho.  @)(++(*
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2019, 08:08:52 AM »
Perhaps she was taken by someone not “in their right mind”? 
But thanks for illustrating the clear window of opportunity between 9.45 and 10pm. .

Personally I prefer to look at possible scenarios which have evidence to support them and that is why I do not believe she was taken from her bedroom by any stranger. Saying she was abducted is a classic 'get out of jail quick' card imo.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline barrier

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2019, 08:09:19 AM »
Of course any one supposedly watching,knew just knew that window of opportunity would occur. Redwood shifted it on to that time,Smithman is the key,always as been imo of course.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline The General

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2019, 08:12:15 AM »
Perhaps she was taken by someone not “in their right mind”? 
But thanks for illustrating the clear window of opportunity between 9.45 and 10pm. .
Taken by someone not 'in their right mind', but wily and aware as a fox and a criminal mastermind.
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2019, 08:13:48 AM »
I don't believe translating something twice or thrice will confuse any numerical detail.  Good try tho.  @)(++(*

if you remove all the text and just leave the numerical data it wouldnt mean much though would it

Offline The General

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2019, 08:16:22 AM »
Perhaps she was taken by someone not “in their right mind”? 
But thanks for illustrating the clear window of opportunity between 9.45 and 10pm. .
You guys should have a meeting. Davros has just reiterated that these timelines are unreliable.
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2019, 08:17:58 AM »
Taken by someone not 'in their right mind', but wily and aware as a fox and a criminal mastermind.
Sure, why not.  It’s either that or the parents fitting the same description, which seems more likely? 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2019, 08:18:53 AM »
You guys should have a meeting. Davros has just reiterated that these timelines are unreliable.
Oh dear, HQ will probably dock our pay now  8(8-))
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly