UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧

Ach! Could be worse. They could set up innocent people of murder, now that would be a story worth linking too.

Dirty cops are capable of anything. Ask Andrew Malkinson.

If someone is thought to have returned to a house after a murder, obviously they WOULD TEST THE HOUSE. 

These comments you make honestly. 

Back to the mockery and emojis I see.  What does TEST THE HOUSE actually mean?   Describe the precise actions of the police then.  Presumably you would have them apply luminol on every square inch of the garden and interior of the house, not to mention dismantling the plumbing in the kitchen, bathroom and toilet to ensure nothing was missed?  How long did this process take?  Surely in a house with at least one self harmer and a menstruating woman there would have been signs of blood somewhere so these would all also have had to be swabbed and sent off to the lab for forensic analysis. Are you 100% confident all this happened in the time Mitchell and his family were being questioned down the police station?  And if they had gone to all this effort and found a few minute traces of Jodi’s blood what exactly do you think that would have proved?  How about addressing the points in my posts instead of resorting to insults? And how about dropping the promises not to keep on engaging with me?  oOviously you’re enjoying the opportunity to mock and deride, but sadly that’s about all you’ve got, nothing in your posts to me makes me think you’ve really thought things through logically or come up with an alternative plausible explanation for what occurred that night. 

https://nij.ojp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training-courses/collecting-dna-evidence-at-property-crime-scenes/crime-scenes/locating-evidence

Precautions to consider when using luminol include the following:
The chemical reaction can destroy evidence at the crime scene.
Luminol will react to other substances, including copper and bleach.
Luminol reactions must be viewed in complete darkness to observe the luminescence.
Based on these considerations, this method can be a valuable tool. It is generally only used after exhausting other options.

https://science.howstuffworks.com/luminol3.htm

One problem with luminol is that the chemical reaction can destroy other evidence in the crime scene. For this reason, investigators only use luminol after exploring a lot of other options. It is definitely a valuable tool for police work, but it's not quite as prevalent in crime investigation as presented on some TV shows. The police don't walk into a crime scene and start spraying luminol on every visible surface

And let’s not forget Mitchell’s house wasn’t even the crime scene, so….

You havie already been questioning thei police’s competence, repeatedly.  I have given reasons why I don’t believe the police would have covered Mitchell’s house in luminol or unscrewed drainpipes but concede his clothes were likely examined with such a substance or similar.  Out of interest was he strip searched on the night of the murder and his clothes and shoes bagged and sent off for forensic analysis?  And not a drop of Jodi’s DNA was found?  Despite being in close contact with her bloodied corpse and crime scene?  That is remarkable.

Seriously, you should give up.

Are you capable of anything else but spreading lies, fairy stories?  Of course not. What do you think of the 'dog eat dog' going on just now? As Mr & Mrs Fibs turn on each other? The very people who's tall tales you spread are calling the other out for lying?

Look in the mirror.

That is one thing we can agree on 

Absolutely and not the first time the stink of corruption has followed L&B police.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/868714.stm