'.. I have never seen anyone going into great detail to show exactly how it was accomplished, which shows that there is no rational which supports it...'
Rubbish.
The forum owner would not permit that on here, for risk of 'libel'.
..and we know how much the mccanns like that word, don't we.
There are ways of phrasing ideas that explore possibilities without wandering into the libel zone. And if it is better kept from Google, there is the members-only area.
Unless I am missing something major, Mr Amaral has never got near to explaining the logistics of his theory, with regards to what happened after Madeleine supposedly had an accident.
And that, in fact, is why I would advise the McCanns to allow the book to be published in the UK. The book 'suggests' various logistical solutions that, frankly, are hilarious.
My favourite is the secret tunnels under Luz one. The children of Luz allegedly use these to get to the sea, for some reason not using the roads or pavements. Then, somehow, the tunnels seem to be forgotten as the children grow into adults, thus becoming secret, though presumably the next generation of children mysteriously is aware of them.
If the reader of the book just thinks about this idea, how did Gerry McCann, an adult, and one who did not grow up in Luz, know of them? And how did Mr Amaral, an adult, and one who did not grow up in Luz, know about them? And if Mr Amaral knew of these, why were they not searched during Mr Amaral's time in charge? Why were the dogs not deployed in them?
Getting the book banned in the UK increases its appeal to those who think it must be damaging to the McCanns. Whereas that book is such a soft target, that publishing it and exposing the weakness of its content, would show it adds very little to the case.