I thought she might be interested in finding out the facts but nope seems not.
Who's facts might that be? From where the defence? I think it was made pretty obvious the defence do not have facts, just claims and conspiracy theories. How can you debate something, when you don't have access to the documents?
I don’t even think she is interested in watching Sandra reply
Nor did i. Why on earth would someone want to watch an egotistical, smirking, child like lier, preaching to the already converted?
Imo it appears Pat has jumped on the band wagon while this is a ‘hot topic’ and tried to make a bit money from this tragic case rather than actually interested in finding out if this was a miscarriage of justice or not.
Did she not by the book? Which means, she has contributed to the case, that is if Lean is to be believed about X amount going towards Luke's fund. She has previous for not declaring funds.
Shame really.
What is a shame, is anybody that dares to have a different opinion, is piled-on, abused, threatened, bullied (A bit like how you attack Nic on here) the behaviour of Val Young and others on her comments section, Forbes previously, hate mail. The list goes on. It is any wonder that people wipe their hands with it?