Goncalo Amaral.

[Wonderfulspam]

I dont know if it was bruckner, neither the method nor scenario. But their must be some convicing evidence. Like i saod not all is released.

Well, it was definitely Brueckner, Wolters said so, & he has the full backing of the BKA, MET & the PJ.
They've all seen the concrete evidence & there's absolutely no dispute at all that Brueckner murdered Maddie & you'd have to be barking mad not to believe them.

Wolters says he has enough evidence to charge already, but they want to charge him with the best body of evidence, even though what they already have is utterly conclusive & irrefutable.

[Rossb]

Well, it was definitely Brueckner, Wolters said so, & he has the full backing of the BKA, MET & the PJ.
They've all seen the concrete evidence & there's absolutely no dispute at all that Brueckner murdered Maddie & you'd have to be barking mad not to believe them.

Wolters says he has enough evidence to charge already, but they want to charge him with the best body of evidence, even though what they already have is utterly conclusive & irrefutable.

Maybe you should join the MET

[Wonderfulspam]

So all that's left for Wolters to do now is to find Maddie's body, parts of the body, DNA or bone fragments.

“We have new findings and new evidence. But there’s nothing that could prove in scientific terms, for example, that Madeleine is dead, such as traces of DNA or bone fragments.”

Not sure why he thought about bones being fragmented specifically, he must envisage a rather messy kind of disposal, like a wood chipper or something presumably.

Perhaps Brueckner mentioned that in part of a web chat we're not privy to.

[Wonderfulspam]

Maybe you should join the MET

With a basement full like mine, you can't be serious.

Not sure they'd want to employ a former drug dealer either, although, I suppose, they wouldn't actually know I ever did that unless I told them.

I'd have to lie during the job interview when they ask me if I've ever taken drugs, & I wouldn't get away with telling them no because no one can ever lie about anything & get away with it.

[jassi]

So all that's left for Wolters to do now is to find Maddie's body, parts of the body, DNA or bone fragments.

“We have new findings and new evidence. But there’s nothing that could prove in scientific terms, for example, that Madeleine is dead, such as traces of DNA or bone fragments.”

Not sure why he thought about bones being fragmented specifically, he must envisage a rather messy kind of disposal, like a wood chipper or something presumably.

Perhaps Brueckner mentioned that in part of a web chat we're not privy to.

I read a novel once where that was the method of disposal and then left for scavengers

Not the sort of thing you'd expect your small time drug dealer to have to hand though.

[Wonderfulspam]

I read a novel once where that was the method of disposal and then left for scavengers

I think there was a case in the USA several years back, man sent his wife through the chipper & into a river. IIRC.

I love true crime, even the really grisly stuff, I'll see if I can find the story.

Here you go, this was actually back in the 80's & he didn't do a very good job of it, they found parts.

"A Norwalk Superior Court jury ruled that Crafts killed his wife, Helle, at their Newtown home in November 1986. Prosecutors said he cut the body with a chain saw and fed parts through a wood chipper on a bridge between Newtown and Southbury.

Police found tiny body parts, including a fingernail and human bone fragments, on the banks of the Housatonic River."

https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2020/02/01/richard-crafts-released-early-1986-connecticut-woodchipper-murder/



Note to future wood chipper murderers.

Be sure the contents fall directly into the water & give the chipper a good clean or destroy it afterwards.

[barrier]

So all that's left for Wolters to do now is to find Maddie's body, parts of the body, DNA or bone fragments.

“We have new findings and new evidence. But there’s nothing that could prove in scientific terms, for example, that Madeleine is dead, such as traces of DNA or bone fragments.”

Not sure why he thought about bones being fragmented specifically, he must envisage a rather messy kind of disposal, like a wood chipper or something presumably.

Perhaps Brueckner mentioned that in part of a web chat we're not privy to.

Not really, don't forget she was a slip of a child, no sign of Ben Needham was there, despite police saying he died in their professional opinion as a result of an accident .

[jassi]

Someone must have done a thorough job though for there to be no trace.
Brueckner on the other hand couldn't  even dispose of his dog and porn stash successfully

[Wonderfulspam]

Not really, don't forget she was a slip of a child, no sign of Ben Needham was there, despite police saying he died in their professional opinion as a result of an accident .

Yep, the neighbour supposedly ran him over in his digger/dump truck then buried him somewhere in Kos.

Bodies can disappear in building foundations, nice load of wet concrete, pop it in there, not much chance of discovery until demolition decades later, centuries even later, & even then, a new builder may not necessarily remove old foundations before building.

Hitobashira, human pillar.

[Wonderfulspam]

Someone must have done a thorough job though for there to be no trace.
Brueckner on the other hand couldn't  even dispose of his dog and porn stash successfully

He might have known about an old disused well somewhere, that's possible, there have been well searches.

[Venturi Swirl]

I read a novel once where that was the method of disposal and then left for scavengers

Not the sort of thing you'd expect your small time drug dealer to have to hand though.

As I recall there were bone fragments in the case of April Jones, left in the fireplace of Mark Bridgers home - it doesn't require lunatic and facetious explanations for why HCW might refer to bone fragments might be something left to be found after forensic examination. 

[Venturi Swirl]

Someone must have done a thorough job though for there to be no trace.
Brueckner on the other hand couldn't  even dispose of his dog and porn stash successfully

yes he should have thrown the dog in the bin like Amaral did with his, and Maddie's dad allegedly did with her, isn't that the most foolproof way of getting rid of an inconvenient corpse these days?  I'm surprised any murderer ever bothers digging a hole or setting fire to the remains, just put the body out for the binmen to collect, you'll get away with it scotfree for sure.. 

[Brietta]

                           NB The thread topic is Goncalo Amaral.
Please expect further off topic posts to be deleted, thank you.

[Brietta]

yes he should have thrown the dog in the bin like Amaral did with his, and Maddie's dad allegedly did with her, isn't that the most foolproof way of getting rid of an inconvenient corpse these days?  I'm surprised any murderer ever bothers digging a hole or setting fire to the remains, just put the body out for the binmen to collect, you'll get away with it scotfree for sure..

Apparently Amaral did not bury his dead dog because the ground was so hard.

[Rossb]

yes he should have thrown the dog in the bin like Amaral did with his, and Maddie's dad allegedly did with her, isn't that the most foolproof way of getting rid of an inconvenient corpse these days?  I'm surprised any murderer ever bothers digging a hole or setting fire to the remains, just put the body out for the binmen to collect, you'll get away with it scotfree for sure..

One poster on youtube believes smithmans sighting was 100 percent gerry, amd dumped in a bin. Ffs very strange to do that, something the mafia used to do in the 70's and 80's in nyc. But here we have the cunning mccanns so openely carrying a child and randomly dumping a beloved child.