So you do not see that as pointing fingers? I am not surprised you do not considering you support Tabak yourself, you're hardly impartial!
Yes... that is the point... I wasn't exactly trying to be impartial...
* I was trying to question why a man has gone to trial apparently guilty only to be found more guiltier....
* I am trying to understand , where the evidence lead to it being Dr Vincent Tabak....
* I am trying to understand why thing do not add up...
* I am trying to understand why witness's were not called...
* I am trying to understand why no-one stood in support of Dr Vincent Tabak...
* I am trying to understand why the CCTV of Canygne Road for Friday 17th December 2010 was not shown to the
jury
* I am trying to understand why CJ's second witness statement is such a secret
* I am trying to understand where the time stamp went to...
* I am trying to understand why Colin Port state that The HopHouse Pub, was the last CCTV images of Joanna
yeates
* I am trying to understand by which method Joanna Yeates arrived home seeing the Hophouse pub is the last
sighting
* I am trying to understand, why evidence bags were taken from Peter Stanleys house
* I am trying to understand, why Tanaj morson was not in court
* I am trying to understand why The Defence helped (imo) bury their client
* I am trying to understand, why the media stay silent
* I am trying to understand why no-one speaks of this case
* i am trying to understand, the motive for this attack
* I am trying to understand , how one person can carry a dead body so many times....
* I am trying to understand why Dr Vincent Tabak would take the body around to his house....
* I am trying to understand why he didn't just leave her in situ and close the door...
* I am trying to understand why no body fluids were found in Joanna Yeates Flat
* I am trying to understand why no body fluids were found in Dr Vincent Tabaks Flat
* I am trying to understand why a flat doesn't look frozen in time....
* I am trying to understand how tiles came be painted, in a flat frozen in time,
* I am trying to understand why you need so many fire engines to recover a person from a grass verge...
* I am trying to understand, why Dr Vincent Tabak appeared at The Old Bailey
* I am trying to understand, why the head of the complex case unit saw a simple murder through to the bitter end..
* I am trying to understand, why this case gets mentioned in odd legal papers
* I am trying to understand, the significance of this case
* I am trying to understand, why builders remove a door that could have potential evidence on it
* I am trying to understand why the same builders are not wearing protective clothing
* I am trying to understand why the intercom panel was removed
* I am trying to understand, why Dr Vincent Tabak flat was put up for rent, before trial
* I am trying to understand, why the jury then were even taken to Dr Vincent Tabaks flat
* I am trying to understand why the parents want people to know that there was a "Piles or Piles of Washing" when
they entered the flat/...
* I am trying to understand wh y they removed Joanna yeate sChristmas Tree from a flat frozen in time
* I am trying to understand why Dr Delaney states Joanna yeates had a flower patterned top on, but in the Ram her
top is clearly Plain.....
* I am trying to understand , why the story on the stand matches the information that was already in the media...
* I am trying to understand, why Dr Vincent Tabak wasn't cautioned when they believed he was a suspect in
December yet interviewed him as a witness...
* I am trying to understand, why a Missing persons case was being treated as a Murder inquiry from the beginning..
* I am trying to understand why the change of command got broken when DCI Phil Jones took over the inquiry..
* I am trying to understand why we were made aware of every detail of this case, before Joanna yeates had been
found...
* I am trying to understand why witness statements were just read out....
* I am trying to understand why there was not hoards of screaming public baying for blood outside the court at trial.
* I am trying to understand why Dr Vincent Tabak didn't apply for bail..
* I am trying to understand , why Dr Vincent Tabak changed representation..
* I am trying to understand, why no-one saw a body on Longwood Lane for over 8 days
* I am trying to understand, why Dr Kelly Sheridan didn't take the stand with her fibre analysis of the Ikea bedding
* I am trying to understand why it takes only 48 hrs to turn around all the forensics in this case
* i am trying to understand how they had the suspects clothes to test in this 48 hour window...
* I am trying to understand, why the computer data wasn't challenged, when said computer could have been used
by more than one person
* I am trying to understand how searches were made on Dr Vincent Tabak's laptop at 1:46am and 1:47am on
Saturday the 18th December 2010, when Dr Vincent Tabak was busy picking up his girlfriend
* I am trying to understand what is so important about Joanna yeates
* I am trying to understand, what is so important about Dr Vincent Tabak
* I am trying to understand, why no witness can put Dr Vincent Tabak either on Canygne Road or anywhere else
that evening
* I am trying to understand why the ASDA time stamps are Missing
* I am trying to understand, why there is no CCTV of the Megane travelling to longwood lane or Asda
* I am trying to understand, how a CCTV image of an unidentified car on Park Street, is supposed to be Dr Vincent
Tabak's car
* I am trying to understand why the CCTV footage of Dr Vincent Tabak' Police interviews were not shown to the
jury, even if they were no comment interviews...
* I am trying to understand why CJ's name is mentioned in court, yet he doesn't appear
* I am trying to understand in July 2011 it was stated that Dr Vincent Tabak was guilty because of a plea... A plea
he could have changed at any time before he reached trial....
* I am trying to understand, why everyone wants this case to just go away
* I am trying to understand, why the Lehmans were so upset at trial
* I am trying to understand why the media were allowed to tweet this case
* I am trying to understand, why the Tabak's say nothing of this case
* I am trying to understand, hiw Crimewatch had footage of Dr Vincent Tabak's car outside Canygne Road main
entrance
* I am trying to understand , why a man resembling Dr Vincent Tabak, is telling the driver where to park this car,
when that car has a designated parking space..
* I am trying to understand how Geoffrey Hardyman statement about Joanna Yeates cat, can be seen as a
statement for the defence
* I am trying to understand why Geoffrey Hardymans statement was ever used in court seeing as he witnessed
nothing having had a cold and gone to bed....
* I am trying to understand why BDP announced that Joanna Yeates had been found on the 24th December 2010 on
there website
* I am trying to understand , why Jess Siggers was wanting to look for Joanna yeates the weekend before she went
missing
* I am trying to understand why the facebook page was removed
* I am trying to understand why the original facebook page was actually a forum and not a group
* I am trying to understand why The Missing group didn't set up as a forum
* I am trying to understand why people on the Missing Group had similar names to those of us on said facebook
forum
* I am trying to understand, why a complete stranger would be a more likely suspect than someone who, new her
* I am trying to understand where the sobbing girl disappeared too
* I am trying to understand why Joanna yeates would open the door to a complete stranger....
* I am trying to understand why Dr Vincent Tabak would shit on his own door step
* I am trying to understand why that day of all days Dr Vincent tabak decided to act on his apparent urges
* I am trying to understand , why no other woman were at trial, accussing Dr Vincent Tabak of similar acts
* I am trying to understand, why there are many holes that could have a legal challenge are left wide open
* I am trying to understand how the Dutch authorities cooperated, with the CPS to allow questioning on their soil of
one of there citizens
* I am trying to understand the urgency of the Holland interview
* I am trying to understand , why Dr Vincent Tabak didn't dump his laptop in a body of water in Holland
* I am trying to understand, why this conviction has never sat properly with me...
And if as mrswah said it is possible he could be guilty... Guilty of what exactly.... And shouldn't there be evidence to support this guilt.... Shouldn't there not be any reason not to question this case in so many ways....
If Dr Vincent Tabak is guilty, Guilty how and Why... The anomalies shouldn't be so vast.... The questions shouldn't be so many.... And civilians shouldn't be giving testimony to what they did in a Police capacity as an Officer who had been given various titles along the way to why he tried to stop a body from thawing....
Because the reason he had to try to stop a body from thawing brings me to a conclusion of he was trying to save some type of evidence... For all we know it could have been a finger print, it could have been a boot impression, it could have been anything... But that statement has not been cleared up, just like many things in this case....
Which can only bring me to a conclusion that there is more to this case than meets the eye... More to Dr Vincent Tabak than a story told on a stand.... More to why Joanna Yeates was murder....
And if questioning the guilt or innocence of Dr Vincent Tabak is too much for some.... maybe some should question the implications of the possibility that he is innocent.... Because that obviously means a killer is walking about free to this day... A killer who may get the same urge to kill again... A killer who knows he/she has managed to get away with this crime.... A killer who may feel more confident in future....
And when another person looses a son or daughter to this killer, maybe then people might think , we should have questioned that case more.... We should have gone with our thoughts on the case, we should have gone with our questions on the case.....
We should have demanded solid evidence to support Dr Vincent Tabak's tale on the stand..... And if he was protecting someone ... who and why?? By protecting someone doesn't make him guilty of murder.... It may make him something else in peoples eyes, but not of the deliberate act of ending someone life by his hand....
So yes, one could say i am being bias.... i am being bias because I do not understand why the evidence doesn't stack up.... And it has never stacked up....
And I question why they were so desperate to put and keep Dr Vincent Tabak behind bars from the day of his arrest... Without anyone being concerned for his rights... without the Dutch Authorities questioning why one of their citizens were being treated in this way....