https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122175642/http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Second-Witness-Statement-of-Christopher-Jefferies.pdfAs is publicly known, I am bringing a civil claim against Avon and Somerset ,
Constabulary (’ASC’) for false imprisonment, breach of my human rights and trespass to person and property. Whilst this is ongoing, I do not wish to speak in any detail about the police’s actions towards me. What I can do, however, is tell the Inquiry what the consequences were for me of certain known or possible inter-actions between the press and the police during this murder inquiry.
Not only is he a witness in a Murder, but he is also in the process of suing The Police, for false imprisonment etc etc...
What I can do, however, is tell the Inquiry what the consequences were for me of certain known or possible inter-actions between the press and the police during this murder inquiry.Twice so far, we have reason for CJ NOT to be a core participant at Leveson 1... Information that may be relevant to Dr Vincent Tabak's prosecution, hidden from ALL...
If he is suing the Police.... why is he at the Leveson.... all connected to the case...
If Leveson said himself, leveson 2 was being delayed, because of investigations and prosecutions etc, and therefore some couldn't be part of Leveson 1... Why on earth is CJ a core participant..
The reasoning for the Police arresting him would be part of the private prosecution... But here is is happy as Larry at the Leveson, where no-one is concerned as to why he is participating....
breach of my human rights and trespass to person and property. Whilst this is ongoing, I do not wish to speak in any detail about the police’s actions towards me. What is he saying here?? They had NO WARRANTS?? they just went onto his property without the correct authority?? Really... If that was the case, then was the warrants for Dr Vincent Tabak in order????
Twice The Leveson has given this man a platform to air his views , when cases are active...
What I can do, however, is tell the Inquiry what the consequences were for me of certain known or possible inter-actions between the press and the police during this murder inquiry.What on god's earth is he talking about?
* Possible Interactions?? What happened to EVIDENCE???
How can he comment on something that he himself has stated is due to a court soon??
I'm not being funny, but this irks me.... He never should have been in Leveson 1 until everything had been completed, he should never have been made a core participant ....
We now have 3 occasions when the judiciary appear to have assisted CJ...
Firstly in July 2011, when the papers are taken to court for contempt.... By this time he wasn't a suspect or an apparent witness, so why contempt god only knows.... At that hearing in July 2011, Dr Vincent tabak's named is mentioned, in the virtual same breath as CJ... But in the context that CJ is wholly Innocent because Dr Vincent Tabak pled guilty....(arrggghh)
If this was a game of football CJ would be winning 1-0 so far....
It is announced before trial he is going to be a core participant....
He should have been a bloody witness at trial , not the leveson... 2-0 CJ
Talk at the Leveson of civil action against the Police, for wrongful conviction etc etc...
By this time Dr Vincent Tabak is convicted, the papers have been sued, the Police look inadequate and everyone loves CJ
3-0 CJ
He doesn't take action, instead he receives a public apology of sorts and is interviewed on TV with a clip of CC Nick Gargan speaking of this... 4-0 CJ
This is why I get sarcastic ... A program is then made, to highlight his plight... My God many peoples lives have been ruined by the press, they didn't get this treatment....
5-0 CJ
He appears on various documentaries, and tells us what he knows and whom he conversed with.....
Was that an own goal....
5-1 CJ
Nobody seemed concerned in any shape or form to the treatment that Dr Vincent Tabak had.... No bail application... etc etc...
But CJ.... It's like they cannot do enough, and I do not get why...
Looks like it was CJ who got the trophy, he seems to have won the match........... (imo)
Edit.. And lets not forget that he was part of the discussion in parliament on 4th February 2011, they may not have mentioned him by name, but everyone knew whom they meant.... ( And all this whilst he was still on POLICE BAIL)....
Looks like the final score is 6-1 to CJ...