Not one persons confirms that Dr Vincent Tabak went to Cambridge at Christmas .... There was no independent verification of this trip to Tanja Morsons parents home at trial whatsoever... No-one verifies anything that Dr Vincent Tabak says on the stand at trial..
Statements are made and read out but they are not in court to verify anything that is said...
Nothing at trial to verify anything in relation to Dr Vincent Tabak....
(1): Nothing to verify his job
(2): Nothing to verify his relationship to Tanja Morson
(3): Nothing to verify his mobile phone records
(4): Nothing to verify his computer use
(5): Nothing to verify which computers had what searches done upon them
(6): Nothing to verify his mental state at any given time
(7): Nothing to verify that he did not know Joanna Yeates in any capacity
(8): Nothing to verify his visit to Asda at a said time
(9): Nothing to verify he didn't know Greg Reardon
(10): Nothing to verify that he had been away working for 6 weeks in America
(11): Nothing to verify his visit to Cambridge for Christmas
(12): Nothing to verify he was a social person
(13): Nothing to verify he entered Flat 1 on 17th December 2010
(14): Nothing to verify that he actually did kill Joanna Yeates
(15): Nothing to verify that he was actually at Canygne Road on Friday 17th December 2010
(16): Nothing to verify that he and Tanja were an item
(17): Nothing to verify which Flat Number he lived in
(18): Nothing to verify any car journey that night
(19): Nothing to verify he drove the car Reg Number RY51 RDU
(20): Nothing to verify that he was seen by anyone
(21): Nothing to verify his Police Interviews on Video tape
(22): Nothing to verify his phone call from Holland
(23): Nothing to verify the text messages between them
(24): Nothing to verify the landline calls
(25): Nothing to Verify the Timeline of events for Dr Vincent Tabak
(26): Nothing to verify he went to work on Friday 17th December 2010
(27): Nothing to verify that he caught the train to Bath
(28): Nothing to verify he cycled
(29): Nothing to verify he arrived home at a certain time
(30): Nothing to verify he drove around looking for somewhere to dump a body
(31): Nothing to verify witness's credentials
There no Official verification of anything really in relation to Dr Vincent Tabak.... We have a Dutchman sat at trial spilling his beans, and everyone around him in this room is content to accept everything that has been said without any verification of anything...
A media happy to report daily on what must be an agonising trial for The Yeates and never once stop to question why the Defence hasn't spent time cross examining witness's..
A Master of Defending who for me... Sat back and watched it all happen, A Defence who did not clarify what credentials the Prosecutions witness's had... They were all allowed to tell their tale as far as i can see ... And, then the next witness was moved onto..
How have the media sat back and allowed this travesty to go ahead?? How were the media just content with an approximate story of what may or may not have happened to Joanna Yeates that weekend, without any concrete evidence to back it up??
The confession idea I am not sold completely on... Hard concrete facts are needed...To substantiate a claim of an action... And they were lacking... Or should I say none existent..
The Prosecution cannot have it both ways.... Either Dr Vincent Tabak killed Joanna Yeates in the manner that they were happy to go along with or he did not.....
And this supposed struggle he had with Joanna Yeates should have left some evidence in The Flat of said struggle... Dr Vincent Tabak should have transfered something from the crime scene and something from the crime scene should have gone with Dr Vincent Tabak to his Flat...
Just to say that your happy he's admitted it.. Isn't good enough... The evidence should also back this claim that he has made.... If we haven't been able to establish as fact that "Tanja Morson" was Dr Vincent Tabaks girl-friend... as her father has shown he had a little problem with it.... Then how can we accept as fact that she is indeed the girl-friend of Dr Vincent Tabak...
The media told us this info... The media have told us lots of info and the media were fed info by the Police...
How does a Defence Lawyer accept a witness statement from a nurse, about an injury that Dr Vincent Tabak had on his person when she apparently examined him?? What relevance to this actual trail did this Injury have...??
An Injury that could have happened a day or two before his arrest... And an Injury he certainly did not receive on the 17th December 2010.... An Injury he could not have had for 5 weeks!!
What was the point of Nurse Ruth Booth- Pearsons statement, when it bore no factual relevant evidence to the trial of Dr Vincent Tabak.. Why would a renowned Defence Lawyer even accept this statement into evidence?? That evidence should have been laughed out of court!!
Evidence is brought to trial to support the events that took place on any given occasion... And I cannot see where any evidence was brought to prove what Dr Vincent Tabak laid claim to, when he took the stand at Bristol crown court...
There was nothing at court to prove any of the statements made by Dr Vincent Tabak.... And
Nothing to verify anything that was claimed about what he supposedly did...And at the end they bury him up to his neck in doo- doo and leave him to rot in jail.... And the media continue the circus and do nothing to Investigate why even the basic's appear not to have been followed in court...(imo) And why a renowned lawyer did not defend his client, but instead insulted him on many many occasions...
Here is the list of witness's that couldn't substanciate anything as they were not at trial to be cross examined by anyone...
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8060.msg417648#msg417648We only know that Dr Vincent Tabak apparently attended a party, because apparently invisible witness's said so... They were not there at trial to confirm anything.. They made a statement, which is hearsay....
Just reminded me of the time when the Police said that Greg Reardon was a "Witness" and it was Splashed all over the papers.... What did he witness??
"Nothing"... he wasn't there according to his testimony... But at least he was in court, which is more than can be said about anyone else who apparently added to what happened over Dr Vincent Tabak's weekend.... They just sent in a doctors note instead.... And didn't attend....
So can someone verify anything that was said on the stand by Dr Vincent Tabak?? Or are we all happy just to see someone swing?? Doesn't this not make the media curious to how our Justice System has been run??? Or will you just accept a Dr's Note!!!