Lie......please represent the facts...because you cant back up that lie, ta and there was me thinking you were such a strickler for facts
Mr Smith:
Regarding the description of the individual who carried the child he states that: he was Caucasian, around 175 to 180m in height. He appeared to be about 35/40 years old. He had an average build, a bit on the thin side. His hair was short, in a basic male cut, brown in colour. He cannot state if it was dark or lighter in tone. He did not wear glasses and had no beard or moustache. He did not notice any other relevant details partly due to the fact that the lighting was not very good.
Mrs Smith:
the individual was male, Caucasian, light-skinned, between 20/30 years of age, of normal physical build, around 1,70/1,75 metres in height. At the time she saw his face but now cannot remember it. She thinks that he had a clean-shaven face. She does not remember seeing tattoos, scars or earrings. She did not notice his ears. His hair was thick-ish, light brown in colour, short at the back (normal) and a bit longer on the top.
So, neither gathered any information about the face of the man- he could have had a beard or moustache or glasses even. There is no memory of chin shape, eye shape, nose shape, cheekbones, scars, etc. They may have glanced at the face but they did not see enough to add any detail to their description.
Yet months later they provided an e-fit.
