Whether anyone listens to it is entirely up to them. I simply said it was recorded by individuals who have experience in a case like this and was interesting by dint of that. Supporters are always deriding Poulton and Brown, sceptics Summers and Swann, for their lack of experience interpreting the evidence in such a case, both opinions I agree with btw. I was merely pointing all to individuals who do have that kind experience.
So your knowledge of the Koran ? Where did it come from ?
The Oxford university perchance?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with your first sentences thanks for bringing this to the forum Faith.
I only got to read the last one . Makes a lot of sense. The discussion about Huntly and how he was cornered was very interesting indeed! (They also mention that knowing smirk as a give-a-way), asking questions of police officers and trying to get involved with the investigation.
They also discussed what I have been saying for years the PJ should have separated the tapas/parents interviewed them separately to decide if further investigation was required or to release them as cleared. speaking to very senior Social workers at an event recently on child protection. they all nodded that the Social services would have been called in instantly by the police. as the parents of all children were removed and questioned separately and individually. All that drama about shutters windows and moving doors would have been investigated there and then! God knows what detectives in this country would make of the screraming ans wailing which took place.
