General discussion about the latest news (not search related)

[ShiningInLuz]

I wonder why this question is being asked about the McCanns?

Are they still together?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8653012/madeleine-mccann-parents-kate-gerry-still-together/

I suspect there will be a slew of such articles around the 12th anniversary.

It takes a fevered imagination to spin a new angle on the story.  But that is how they earn their corn.

[Brietta]

I wonder why this question is being asked about the McCanns?

Are they still together?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8653012/madeleine-mccann-parents-kate-gerry-still-together/

This is surely posted on the wrong thread ... it would be far more appropriate for the "Sceptics beliefs?' thread as at one time such rumours have been rife on sceptic fora and sometimes tabloids.
I think it goes back as far as Kate sleeping with the children one night on holiday therefore I don't wonder about sceptics wondering ... they've been doing so for twelve years.

[barrier]

This is surely posted on the wrong thread ... it would be far more appropriate for the "Sceptics beliefs?' thread as at one time such rumours have been rife on sceptic fora and sometimes tabloids.
I think it goes back as far as Kate sleeping with the children one night on holiday therefore I don't wonder about sceptics wondering ... they've been doing so for twelve years.

Are you saying the Sun is sceptical or at least the author of the piece is.

[jassi]

As a non-search related article about the mcCanns, published in a newspaper, it seems a perfect shoe-in for this thread.

[Brietta]

Are you saying the Sun is sceptical or at least the author of the piece is.

Sigh ... I didn't bother to read the link since there is a high probability I have encountered it all before in some shape or form.

[barrier]

Sigh ... I didn't bother to read the link since there is a high probability I have encountered it all before in some shape or form.

Well seeing as theres nowt happening in the case and brexit is on its easter recess,might as well regurgitate same old,some one will buy a paper cause of it.

[Venturi Swirl]

I seem to remember some people (mentioning no names) announcing the McCanns had split up on Twitter years ago,  I reckon this would have made their day had it been true.

[Brietta]

I seem to remember some people (mentioning no names) announcing the McCanns had split up on Twitter years ago,  I reckon this would have made their day had it been true.

It is a recurrent theme ... and sadly I have to agree it is one with the basest aspirations.

[Wonderfulspam]

I seem to remember some people (mentioning no names) announcing the McCanns had split up on Twitter years ago,  I reckon this would have made their day had it been true.

Not likely ever to happen. The pair are forever united in a tragedy IMO

[kizzy]

I seem to remember some people (mentioning no names) announcing the McCanns had split up on Twitter years ago,  I reckon this would have made their day had it been true.

Do you honestly think anyone cares - whether they stay together or not?

I would think for them - united we stand divided we fall.IMO

[Brietta]

Do you honestly think anyone cares - whether they stay together or not?

I would think for them - united we stand divided we fall.IMO

Someone cared enough to bring it to the forum for discussion ... I think that may answer your question?

[kizzy]

Someone cared enough to bring it to the forum for discussion ... I think that may answer your question?

Not really - you may have interpreted it as that.

I didn't.

[G-Unit]

Not really - you may have interpreted it as that.

I didn't.

I brought it to the forum as an example of irresposible and unnecessary journalism, which is what I said. If they had parted it might be of interest to some, although so many people part these days it wouldn't be all that interestng imo. It doesn't even say that, though, it just insinuates something in order to attract readers. Disgusting rag.

[kizzy]

I brought it to the forum as an example of irresposible and unnecessary journalism, which is what I said. If they had parted it might be of interest to some, although so many people part these days it wouldn't be all that interestng imo. It doesn't even say that, though, it just insinuates something in order to attract readers. Disgusting rag.

Just as I interpreted it as that - seems it was B who thought you cared. 

[G-Unit]

Just as I interpreted it as that - seems it was B who thought you cared. 

There are people like you on this forum who have no trouble at all understanding my motives and my posts. There are others who seem completely unable to do so for some reason.