I agree.
I don't understand why the police needed to arrest CJ at all, to be honest. Of course, they had the right to question him further, and to insist that he went along to the police station to answer those questions, but was it really necessary to make a dramatic dawn arrest------after all, they had no evidence that he had done anything!
With AerialHunter pointing me back to your post, and what his post also said, I started looking at it in a different light....
The Judge Rinder Crime story which I quoted from:
Now at 22:30 The Police Officer says:
Christopher was quite well known... erm.... In the area, He's a retired
School Master from Clifton College...And actually he became quite an integral part of the initial investigation.... He was a witness and erm.......
He described erm.... seeing some people walking down the driveway of the address... On that Friday evening around about the relevant time... We knew Joanna had returned home....
When I first looked at the statement I looked at it differently... now if CJ's arrest was meant as smoke and mirrors,.. I am now looking at this statement in a different light..
DCI Phil Jones says that CJ...
.And actually he became quite an integral part of the initial investigation
Looking at that statement what did he mean???
How could CJ be an integral part of the investigation.... this video is made after Dr Vincent Tabak has been sentenced and serving his time in prison...
CJ was what????
A distraction???
They used his arrest for what purpose???
By CJ being in custody the Police had access to the flats... Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja were all ready in Holland.. Did they access Flat 2 ???
Had they planned to get CJ out of the way???
Anne Reddrop had stated the planned arrest of Dr Vincent Tabak had started in December 2010 ,and whilst the media were having a field day at CJ's expense, they were flying over to Holland to interview Dr Vincent Tabak as a suspect (IMO)..
So what part of CJ's arrest was integral to this investigation???
he became quite an integral part of the initial investigation.
What does that statement say??? "Initial Investigation"????
What Evidence as mrswah pointed out did they have against CJ??? NOTHING!!
So to be an integral part, the only use of CJ was to remove him from the premises... what other reason could he be an "Integral Part" of an "Investigation"??
Why would they need him out of the way...?? what does the "Policeman" know??
Plainly put.... If CJ had such IMPORANT INFORMATION to this case.... "INTEGRAL"... why wasn't he at TRIAL to support the PROSECUTIONS CLAIMS??
Or was "INTEGRAL"... giving them access to the Flats at Canygne Road as they had taken control of CJ's Possesions????