Yes, sadie is adamant that the Moroccan woman had Madeleine on her back ... and that a lookie-likee daughter was procured by 'them' ( the 'elites' )
Not only that, sadie's 'trained eye' also determines that the older child walking alongside is the murdered Joana Cipriano ( sadie can tell by her ankles )
It's all rather sad really
My dear Icabod. Twisting my words as usual. That is sad.
I have never been adamant that a Moroccan woman was carrying Madeleine on her back. Try reading my posts and get it right the next time.
To start off with I am not at all certian that the so called woman is a woman at all.
What I am pretty certain of, is that the little girl being carried is NOT Bushra.
- Wrong hair colour
- Wrong type of hair ... too straight
- Wrong build ... too bonny
- Wrong personality... Lacks the interest if the little girl being carried
- Sits up too high
- Face is wrong
And what I have thought after careful assessment is that the little girl being carried is remarkably like Madeleine.
- The bend of her hair is like Madeleines
- The fineness of her hair is like Madeleines
- The hair colour is like Madeleines
- The fringe length is about what would be expected nearly 4 months after the abduction (0.5 inches /month usually so almost 2" longer than in early may)
- The little girl sits lower than Bushra does cos the limbs are slimmer. Madeleines limbs are pretty slim; she would be able to tuck them away and sit low, like the little girl being carried
- The face hollows and rises are like Madeleines as are the eye sockets and eyes .... and the nose too
- The little girl being carried is interested in what is going on .... just like Madeleine would be
I have said that on the evidence before my eyes, I do not believe the little girl is Bushra, but I think it likely that it might be Madeleine. Never have I said that she definitely is Madeleine. Never have I been adamant that she IS Madeleine.
Please DO NOT twist my words.
Tbqh tho, I think she is .... but it is up to you to decide
------------------------------------------------
Now with Joana
Why are you twisting my words there too, Icabod
My reasons, as you well know were NOT JUST her ankles, but also
- the shape of her lower legs, which are a little unusual.
- Her feet, which are quite wide and seem to be a little on the outside of her ankles rather than immediately underneath
- The comparison of Joanas baby photo to the little girl in the orange top. The skull shape changes little with age as does the hairline (excepting baldness). The boney structure of the skull, cheekbones , brow etc varies little with age... and there are definite simialrities.
However, the lower face slims and lengthens with maturity, so that is not such a good guide
- The general posture of the little girl
- The general figure of the little girl in the orange top is of a similar type to Joanas
- The age of the little girl is just about spot on for Jaona, who would be 11, almost 12 in the photo as the girl in the orange top would be too.
............................
Oh and then there are a couple of other factors
1) Harems of children are kept in N Africa by western businessmen
2) It is a well recognised fact that drug traffickers are also quite often involved in human trafficking.
3) Then there is the Hemp, canabis, hashish trade from Morocco (Rif )
You see trafficking all started way back with global traders and slave trafficking and human trafficking of all kinds. West to East, and East to west mainly but also South to north and North to south. Pirates, Privateers, smugglers etc. Fascinating to read about it. If you are interested I could recommend a visit to the Slave museum in Liverpool
Gradually the drug trade built up too, where there was demand for it. Opium, canabis etc. growing in different parts and being trafficked along with slaves around the world.
Interesting stuff to read about.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And then. of course, there is the Raymond Hewitt possible connection.
It is my understanding that
- he has claimed to have seen Madeleine twice.
- En route to his campsite from the Northern Morocco Ports, he would have travelled down and back up that road where the group photo was taken.
- He camped only 25 miles further on from Zinat at Chefchaouen.
- He smoked kif (hemp) all the time he was there.
- for the journeys both ways he got a phone call and suddenly set off on his journeys (IIRC)
- The return journey was on about the same day as the group were photographed going somewhere with suitacses and along the same road !
- Somewhere special, complete with smart clothing and suitcases.
Was the little girl going with Hewitt and mixed in with his six kids?
Was she, at the very least going in his van , to be carried on to an ocean going boat?
Was the little girl being carried by the wo/man going with them?
Were the other women going to the same destination, but seperately, maybe by boat or maybe by plane from Tetouan International airport just about 15 miles away by road ?
===============
Now, I dont expect most of you to agree, cos you NEVER do, preferring to rubbish EVERYTHING I suggest.
But some might like to read my thoughts as presented here ... and wonder like me. These are only my thoughts and I make no accusations, but in luie of co-incidences, I think the possibilities maybe should be looked at
Could it have been Madeleine?
Could it have been Joana?
Might the two occasions that Raymond Hewlitt saw Madeleine have been as he transported her to and from Zinat, in his van with his family of 6 children, across the Straits of Gibraltar?
It is up to you now to think what you will.
And do you know what is truly sad, Icabod?
The fact that for some reason you refuse to consider any scenario that Madeleine and Joana might still be alive.
