Jane Tanner was actually checking up on HER children: that was verified.
As it was with Gerry.
As it was with the neighbour.
You seem to forget it was dark; Jane was wearing rubber flip-flops; and why in earth would she have called out to Gerry for no reason whatsoever? Why would the neighbour have noticed her when he was looking at Gerry and talking to him?
Why would the neighbour notice a man walking along carrying a child? Gerry didn’t notice a man, either...and that would have been a good excuse for him if he “suddenly remembered” such a sighting?
And WTF would Jane make such a sighting up?
And tell me HOW one year later (May have been less) that very man JT saw cane forward?! He SAID categorically it was HIM carrying his daughter back from night crèche. His statement was checked out and corroborated by the crèche staff and his wife. And people on here are saying it didn’t happen...
This event has always puzzled me and even more so when I saw Ch4's attempt at a reconstruction when Jane Tanner and Gerry McCann publicly disputed each others version of events to such an extent that Tanner burst out crying.
The mechanics of what occurred have been gone over several times. Gerry McCann claims he crossed the road to speak to Jez Wilkins while he in turn claimed that it was he who crossed the road after seeing Gerry walking down the footpath outside 5a. Neither men saw Jane Tanner who passed a matter of feet from them and in full vision of Wilkins who says he was stood at the kerb holding his child's buggy. Tanner claims that Gerry was stood on the footpath with his back to her while Wilkins was facing both Gerry and herself. (See pics below)
Work that out if you can? Who if anyone is mistaken, lying, blind or simply confused? Take your pick!
[attachment deleted by admin]
