Goncalo Amaral.

[Carana]

I don't see what's particularly important about it. All I was saying was that, from memory, Sandra Felgueiras' criticism predated Netflix by quite some time.

[Venturi Swirl]

I don't see what's particularly important about it. All I was saying was that, from memory, Sandra Felgueiras' criticism predated Netflix by quite some time.

Carana, it's of utmost importance.  You're not allowed to recall things from memory or express an opinion without a cite to back it up.  It's a new law and if you break it you must withdraw the claim or be publicly humiliated.   

[Carana]

Carana, it's of utmost importance.  You're not allowed to recall things from memory or express an opinion without a cite to back it up.  It's a new law and if you break it you must withdraw the claim or be publicly humiliated.

Perhaps I shouldn't have said anything: people do have a tendency to cite things "from memory", and I agree that memories can get distorted with time. And sometimes, distorted memories get repeated as fact... so I accept Faith's comment.

However, I don't see anything critically important about it. lol

[Mr Gray]

what is clear is that SF has accused amaral of lying to her....thats whats important

[Carana]

The line above from some poster:

"... Bouncy, since this an insert in a talk show in Portuguese, with no English subtitles, I can see it's no easy task to get the footage on here."

Then follows the mod's summary, talking about Sandra's comments re asking pertinent questions one year on from when arguido status was lifted.

[faithlilly]

Perhaps I shouldn't have said anything: people do have a tendency to cite things "from memory", and I agree that memories can get distorted with time. And sometimes, distorted memories get repeated as fact... so I accept Faith's comment.

However, I don't see anything critically important about it. lol

Thank you for your efforts to find the cite however it’s obvious that there is absolutely no evidence that SF expressed any doubts about the investigation before the ‘dogs’ interview. She may have expressed doubts before the Netflix documentary but there is nothing in the public domain that suggests that.

For me her changing of sides is purely cynical.

[Mr Gray]

Thank you for your efforts to find the cite however it’s obvious that there is absolutely no evidence that SF expressed any doubts about the investigation before the ‘dogs’ interview. She may have expressed doubts before the Netflix documentary but there is nothing in the public domain that suggests that.

For me her changing of sides is purely cynical.

I think it's blatantly obvious she changed sides because she felt she was lied to...evidence being...Amaral didn't understand the dna

[The General]

I think it's blatantly obvious she changed sides because she felt she was lied to...evidence being...Amaral didn't understand the dna

If he 'didn't understand the DNA', then how could he possibly be lying?

[Mr Gray]

If he 'didn't understand the DNA', then how could he possibly be lying?

Read my post again....I never said he was lying. I realise he's just dim...Sandra thought he was deliberately lying it seems

[The General]

Read my post again....I never said he was lying. I realise he's just dim...Sandra thought he was deliberately lying it seems

She thought she was being lied to, so she changed horses, yet you think he was simply mistaken?

[Mr Gray]

She thought she was being lied to, so she changed horses, yet you think he was simply mistaken?

I think its clear he simply hadnt got  a clue as  may well not had much experience in having to deal with evidence in the past

[The General]

I think its clear he simply hadnt got  a clue as  may well not had much experience in having to deal with evidence in the past

So he 'didn't have a clue', yet somehow, incongruously, was persuasive enough to beguile this crack investigative reporter, despite her obviously knowing him professionally prior to this case?
In the immortal words of Aretha, Who's Zoomin' Who?

[Eleanor]

I think its clear he simply hadnt got  a clue as  may well not had much experience in having to deal with evidence in the past

He never needed Evidence in the past.  He managed very well without it, thank you very much.
.

[The General]

He never needed Evidence in the past.  He managed very well without it, thank you very much.
.

The man's an utter genius legend dude. Don't need no evidence, yo, jus cruisin' on up to the judge, pinch the frame of those Randolph Aviator's down, glance, wink, tip the fedora at the jury and mosey on right back out the door.
I can see the fascination now.

[Robittybob1]

Carana, it's of utmost importance.  You're not allowed to recall things from memory or express an opinion without a cite to back it up.  It's a new law and if you break it you must withdraw the claim or be publicly humiliated.

Have you got the cite for that so called "New Law"?   You don't want to be humiliated do you!