Neither can OG. Just like you they've chosen to believe the McCanns about the open shutters and window. So the abduction theory rests on believing the McCanns, not on any objective evidence imo.
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree and that is true when comparing Amaral’s destructive obsession with Kate and Gerry McCann and time which for him which seems to have been stopped back in September 2007 while the rest of the world moved on.
It is evident in the fixation Amaral's supporters have in promulgating almost exactly what he says that some at least are also caught like flies in amber and many of whom outshine Amaral's meaningless and boring petty detestations.
Amaral:Therefore, if there is a kidnapper to leave no marks, this would be the entry point.
But within that line of implying that the children were safe, it was invented that a window was found open, but there is great confusion in the statements because some say they were open, others did not know.
but there is one thing that the child's mother says in statements and that is that when she was in the apartment that window was always closed, with the shutters closed.
What is asked is why that night the only fingerprint that appears in the window is that of the child's mother and not of an alleged abductor.
Interviewer:Those were the doubts you always had?
Amaral:These are not doubts.
They are certainties.
We are sure that no one passed through there.
If anyone comes to say that they entered and left the window, it is completely a lie.
From Amaral’s ‘fragile’ abduction theory to Amaral’s Calpol theory … Amaral continues to bang the same drum he always has and in my opinion all the while demonstrating his unique incapability of organising a search in a cattery for a cat let alone the search for a missing child.
