Goncalo Amaral.

[Mr Gray]

Well if there's completely new information,  why hasn't Amaral come forward and enlightened the German Police?

amaral has no new information...its new to CBs lawyer. If hes relying on amaral then he's a fool...and no doubt about it....note to mods...If john can call HCW a pillock, which he is perfectly entitled to ......then its raesonable to refer to the lawyer as  afool.

[kizzy]

See I'm capable of putting subscript text into your post but it has a message showing it was me.  How do I hide the message?

Its ok Rob I have worked it out its when I put a s in brackets.

Like when I put theory

It comes up on the post ok but a line through it when posted

[Brietta]

I will be extremely surprised if Brueckner's lawyer has not received numerous communications from a legal entity from these shores who is well known to us but probably less so in the real world.

Poor man 🙆‍♂️ if he has listened to not the www as we know it but the www with a black fedora'd individual smack in the middle of it.

[Brietta]

Its ok Rob I have worked it out its when I put a s in brackets.

Like when I put theory

It comes up on the post ok but a line through it when posted

WOW!!! so it wasn't B after all then.  It was all down to you.  Is it possible that B might warrant an apology.  It's perfectly fine though, don't bother as B won't be holding her breath waiting for one.

[kizzy]

WOW!!! so it wasn't B after all then.  It was all down to you.  Is it possible that B might warrant an apology.  It's perfectly fine though, don't bother as B won't be holding her breath waiting for one.

I will give you an apoligy B. 

But in fairness, I did ask you not accuse you.

[Brietta]

I will give you an apoligy B. 

But in fairness, I did ask you not accuse you.

Apology accepted in the spirit in which it was given.

[Anthro]

amaral has no new information...its new to CBs lawyer. If hes relying on amaral then he's a fool...and no doubt about it....note to mods...If john can call HCW a pillock, which he is perfectly entitled to ......then its raesonable to refer to the lawyer as  afool.

Maybe Fulscher is considering bringing Tannerman back in the picture?

[Brietta]

Maybe Fulscher is considering bringing Tannerman back in the picture?

I hadn't thought of that Anthro.

I think the child being carried was Madeleine.  But if recent tabloid reports that Brueckner had an accomplice are correct that certainly puts a different complexion on it.

For one it explains the open window despite Amaral's amateurish assessment of it.

[Mr Gray]

Maybe Fulscher is considering bringing Tannerman back in the picture?

I think it will be amarals already abandoned non evidence... So perhaps the Smith sighting too.
W
I really hope he does so that the rubbish spouted by amaral can be totally ridiculed

[Mr Gray]

so CBs lawyer claims new evidence from amaral will clear his client.  So this seems to confirm that CB does not have an alibi as I suggested. The red flag just went even higher

[kizzy]

so CBs lawyer claims new evidence from amaral will clear his client.  So this seems to confirm that CB does not have an alibi as I suggested. The red flag just went even higher

I dont know how .....how silly really to think a drifter would know what he was doing on 3. 5. 2007.

Its like the friend/witness who saw the vidio of the rape, when it seems no vidio exists.

What he can maybe prove with the help of GA and PJ is no abduction took place so how could CB be abductor.

[Mr Gray]

I dont know how .....how silly really to think a drifter would know what he was doing on 3. 5. 2007.

Its like the friend/witness who saw the vidio of the rape, when it seems no vidio exists.

What he can maybe prove with the help of GA and PJ is no abduction took place so how could CB be abductor.

I think amarals involvement will be hilarious... I'm looking forward to it

[Robittybob1]

Its ok Rob I have worked it out its when I put a s in brackets.

Like when I put theory

It comes up on the post ok but a line through it when posted

Try B in the brackets if you want it to be bold text.

[Brietta]

I think amarals involvement will be hilarious... I'm looking forward to it

Certainly interesting.  The thought arises that should there be a trial and should Amaral be called as a witness for the defence to a trial in Germany, and I think that may very well be where the trial will be held due to the Portuguese statute of limitations, will he agree to attend?

I don't know a thing about how criminal or any other German trials are conducted but the thought of Amaral's testimony facing thorough forensic scrutiny divorced from the comfort of the chat show sofa is intriguing.

[Mr Gray]

Certainly interesting.  The thought arises that should there be a trial and should Amaral be called as a witness for the defence to a trial in Germany, and I think that may very well be where the trial will be held due to the Portuguese statute of limitations, will he agree to attend?

I don't know a thing about how criminal or any other German trials are conducted but the thought of Amaral's testimony facing thorough forensic scrutiny divorced from the comfort of the chat show sofa is intriguing.

thats why i find it interesting...it will bring amarals theory and expertise out into the open to be challenged. hes ok making these claims on friendly portuguese chat shows where he goes unchallenged.

I can just imagine him telling Fulscher that the dogs, who have a 100% record and have solved over 200 cases, alerted in the apartmnet and therefore prove maddies body was in that apartmnet.


it completely exhonerates his client.....if the alerts are reliable