Author Topic: Goncalo Amaral.  (Read 408268 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3885 on: October 01, 2021, 10:07:24 AM »
Thanks Myster.

https://www.contrapontoeditores.pt/
Search results by: MADDIE; NO MORE LIES
Books (0)    eBooks (0)    Authors (0)    Other results (0)


Looks like fans of the author will have to wait a little longer for him to set the record straight.  I'm still of the opinion he should be doing that under oath and in a court of law.  But even then who could trust him tell us which lies he isn't going to tell anymore.  One of the last times he testified under oath he continued with his lies and has the criminal conviction for perjury which categorically proves it.

I really want to hear his excuse for why he lied about Brueckner's physical appearance and the cartoon covered camper van which not another person has mentioned in any context.
Should be interesting.

If the publisher isn't CONTRAPONTO I wonder who is?
It is the publisher, they just don't come up on the first page of google results (well they didn't when I googled them). 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3886 on: October 01, 2021, 10:56:42 AM »
From the new book...


In a statement sent to the newsrooms, the editor writes: "In the so-called «Caso Maddie», the only certainty is that, on the night of May 3, 2007, after 10 pm, in Praia da Luz, in the Algarve, it was given a disappearance alert for a British child, aged approximately 4 years"





Back pedaling

Offline jassi

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3887 on: October 01, 2021, 11:45:40 AM »
yet another Madeleine-related book not to put on my reading list, but good to see that supporters are so interested.  ?{)(**
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3888 on: October 01, 2021, 11:54:02 AM »
yet another Madeleine-related book not to put on my reading list, but good to see that supporters are so interested.  ?{)(**

He was thought by some to be keeping quiet until the ECHR verdict was announced. It seems like that idea was wrong. Wishful thinking perhaps...
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3889 on: October 01, 2021, 01:17:11 PM »
He was thought by some to be keeping quiet until the ECHR verdict was announced. It seems like that idea was wrong. Wishful thinking perhaps...
I think you are imagining things... Who has said he's waiting for the echr verdict... I think you are making things up.

He needs to bring a book out now because after the verdict his credibility will be zero imo.

I've said he's been quiet and he has... This book will not be another repeat of his last one.. I can't see him making any defamatory claims.. He knows he's already in trouble...

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3890 on: October 01, 2021, 01:29:43 PM »
I think you are imagining things... Who has said he's waiting for the echr verdict... I think you are making things up.

He needs to bring a book out now because after the verdict his credibility will be zero imo.

I've said he's been quiet and he has... This book will not be another repeat of his last one.. I can't see him making any defamatory claims.. He knows he's already in trouble...

Your forecasting powers aren't the best, of course. I remember you being convinced that the McCanns had won the libel trial;
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2787.msg157236#msg157236

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3891 on: October 01, 2021, 02:09:22 PM »
yet another Madeleine-related book not to put on my reading list, but good to see that supporters are so interested.  ?{)(**
Don't pretend you won't be lapping it all up, even if second-hand. 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3892 on: October 01, 2021, 02:27:35 PM »
Your forecasting powers aren't the best, of course. I remember you being convinced that the McCanns had won the libel trial;
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2787.msg157236#msg157236
You are mistaken again... That post refers to the first court case which I felt.. Correctly... Amaral would win.

When they bought the old guard in for the appeal I said things could now go dfferently

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3893 on: October 01, 2021, 02:41:40 PM »
You are mistaken again... That post refers to the first court case which I felt.. Correctly... Amaral would win.

When they bought the old guard in for the appeal I said things could now go dfferently

What old guard?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Angelo222

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3894 on: October 01, 2021, 03:05:27 PM »
You are mistaken again... That post refers to the first court case which I felt.. Correctly... Amaral would win.

When they bought the old guard in for the appeal I said things could now go dfferently

How's the ECHR case going Davel?  Has it been dumped yet as I suspect it will be?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3895 on: October 01, 2021, 03:27:24 PM »
How's the ECHR case going Davel?  Has it been dumped yet as I suspect it will be?

You are obviously not up to date with what's going on.. LOL

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3896 on: October 01, 2021, 03:29:08 PM »
What old guard?

The old guard that doesn't understand how to apply ECHR law

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3897 on: October 01, 2021, 03:57:12 PM »
The old guard that doesn't understand how to apply ECHR law

As opposed to Maria Emília de Melo e Castro who tried to apply restrictions under Article 10 to a retired police inspector's freedom of expression?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3898 on: October 01, 2021, 04:10:26 PM »
As opposed to Maria Emília de Melo e Castro who tried to apply restrictions under Article 10 to a retired police inspector's freedom of expression?

I think you are mistaken again.. It was the duty of reserve she felt applied... The SC felt it didnt... Whos right and why

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3899 on: October 01, 2021, 04:45:53 PM »
I think you are mistaken again.. It was the duty of reserve she felt applied... The SC felt it didnt... Whos right and why

The Appeal Judges said;

irrespective of the reasons given by the appellant for publication, it is hardly understandable that a civil servant, even more a retired one, should carry on his silence and reserve duties, thus limiting the exercise of his right to opinion as to the interpretation of facts already made public by the j udicial authority and widely discussed (actually largely at the instigation of the protagonists themselves) in national and international media.
https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Decision_19_04_2016.htm

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0