Goncalo Amaral.

[Venturi Swirl]

I see the much vaunted sleuths are sleuthed out.

Putin to bomb us or CB charged, more likely Putins bombs imo.

Thus spoke the Cheery Harbinger Of Doom.

[barrier]

Thus spoke the Cheery Harbinger Of Doom.

Don't let it get you down,

[Venturi Swirl]

Don't let it get you down,

too late.

[Ms Para glider]

You are again doing what you deny doing. If any evidence was missed then it doesn't exist, so no matter how much you speculate you're wasting your time. I prefer to examine the evidence which does exist.

Am I really? And what exactly did I "deny" doing then?

I think you'll find what I said is that you were misrepresenting my point. You still are.

I also think it's you who is wasting their time if you expect to find the crucial answers to the case in the PJ files. They've already been examined to death and don't lead to any clear conclusions. So my point remains valid. It's the things the PJ missed at the time which are most likely to solve the case now.

[jassi]

Am I really? And what exactly did I "deny" doing then?

I think you'll find what I said is that you were misrepresenting my point. You still are.

I also think it's you who is wasting their time if you expect to find the crucial answers to the case in the PJ files. They've already been examined to death and don't lead to any clear conclusions. So my point remains valid. It's the things the PJ missed at the time which are most likely to solve the case now.

[/b]

Assuming they are there to be found, or even looked for

IMO all 3 forces have been somewhat selective in what they have looked for

[Mr Gray]

[/b]

Assuming they are there to be found, or even looked for

IMO all 3 forces have been somewhat selective in what they have looked for

Its what they've found that's important

[jassi]

I agree, which IMO is not very much.

[Venturi Swirl]

I agree, which IMO is not very much.

as you don’t have access to the police investigations your opinion is completely worthless (but thanks for sharing!)

[Brietta]

Thank you for sharing your opinion of what I should be discussing. I don't know what there is to say about Amaral's claims concerning Brueckner, apart from agreeing that he appears to have got it wrong.

You seem to think the evidence in the PJ files can be ignored because the investigations have 'moved on'. I don't share that opinion. That evidence was gathered at the time from people who were there, and any present investigation needs to take account of it imo.

I don't give a tinker's curse what you decide to discuss - I do think that whatever that may be should reflect the topic of the thread you are discussing it on.

In this instance the topic of the thread is Goncalo Amaral.  Self explanatory one would have thought.

[Nicholas]

Roberta Glass True Crime Podcast - ‘Madeleine McCann - a simple plan’

 https://www.spreaker.com/user/7811742/madeleine-mccann-a-simple-plan-feat-tom

[G-Unit]

Am I really? And what exactly did I "deny" doing then?

I think you'll find what I said is that you were misrepresenting my point. You still are.

I also think it's you who is wasting their time if you expect to find the crucial answers to the case in the PJ files. They've already been examined to death and don't lead to any clear conclusions. So my point remains valid. It's the things the PJ missed at the time which are most likely to solve the case now.

I've never thought answers could be found in the PJ files. What is there is evidence which casts doubt on the McCann's theory. That's why Amaral retired and wrote his book.

[Venturi Swirl]

Roberta Glass True Crime Podcast - ‘Madeleine McCann - a simple plan’

 https://www.spreaker.com/user/7811742/madeleine-mccann-a-simple-plan-feat-tom

Have you listened to this?  ihave had to pause it after the stunning revelation of a handwritten timeline found in Kate McCann’s possessions after the abduction which only had on check on it - Gerry’s from 9pm to 9.30pm. Apparently this note is in the files and was (according to Tom on the podcast) written before Madeleine disappeared. 

[G-Unit]

Roberta Glass True Crime Podcast - ‘Madeleine McCann - a simple plan’

 https://www.spreaker.com/user/7811742/madeleine-mccann-a-simple-plan-feat-tom

They claim they're just following the evidence in the PJ files, but the podcast begins with yet another timeline allegedly found by the PJ amongst Kate McCann's papers. That evidence is not in the files.

[Venturi Swirl]

I've never thought answers could be found in the PJ files. What is there is evidence which casts doubt on the McCann's theory. That's why Amaral retired and wrote his book.

Did the archiving report highlight the evidence which cast doubt on the abduction theory.?  If so please could you remind us what it said, thanks.

[Venturi Swirl]

They claim they're just following the evidence in the PJ files, but the podcast begins with yet another timeline allegedly found by the PJ amongst Kate McCann's papers. That evidence is not in the files.

I just made the same point.  More McCann bashing misinformation, just what we need!