No one disputed that did they?
What I would like to see is a well thought out analysis of how the "abduction" was executed taking into consideration all the available evidence relating to the ambient conditions at the time.
So far no takers.
The mechanics of an abduction are ridiculously simple and the degree of risk involved using either potential method is ridiculously low. It matters not a jot whether the timeline of checks that night is accurate or whether it is inaccurate. It happens to get even easier with less frequent checks but it does not require them. And both methods can be done by a single person. Neither requires a team effort.
A while back I started from this point. Given what we know of the checking, is it possible to mount an operation that results in the abduction of Madeleine, and better still, is low risk? The answer is that there are two ways that satisfy both criteria.
There was low or zero risk until such times as an abductor entered the front door of apartment 5A or until an abductor passed through the unlocked patio doors. From that point on it is simply a question of speed.
However, in the absence of evidence to support these two methods, I cannot claim that this is what happened, merely that both are feasible logistically.