Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?

[faithlilly]

My logic is not flawed.

You logic is absolutely flawed. Just because an occurrence is more improbable than another does not mean it couldn't have happened. Peter Voisey is just such a case. It was highly improbable that an individual unknown to the family would have taken the risk of entering a house which he knew to be occupied and finding a child, alone and vulnerable, and having the nerve to abduct her, but it happened. A number of improbable events leading to a criminal offence.

[faithlilly]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/kidnapper-spied-madeleine-mccann-police-1897649

If you have had a long hard day this will provide some light entertainment before you turn in.

Thanks Alice that's cheered me right up !

[Alfie]

You logic is absolutely flawed. Just because an occurrence is more improbable than another does not mean it couldn't have happened. Peter Voisey is just such a case. It was highly improbable that an individual unknown to the family would have taken the risk of entering a house which he knew to be occupied and finding a child, alone and vulnerable, and having the nerve to abduct her, but it happened. A number of improbable events leading to a criminal offence.

Er, if that is what I had ever asserted then you'd be right - my logic would be flawed.  But as I've never said that then I'm aftaid it's back to the drawing board for you, but thanks for highlighting the case of a sucessful child abduction from a house by a complete stranger.  So, as in this case, abduction is both possible and plausible.   

[Alfie]

Thanks Alice that's cheered me right up !

What a strange pair you are, to find that article so amusing. 

[faithlilly]

Er, if that is what I had ever asserted then you'd be right - my logic would be flawed.  But as I've never said that then I'm aftaid it's back to the drawing board for you, but thanks for highlighting the case of a sucessful child abduction from a house by a complete stranger.  So, as in this case, abduction is both possible and plausible.

Is possible and plausible per se, there was time, but the surrounding importable events make it unlikely.

[faithlilly]

What a strange pair you are, to find that article so amusing.

It would be hilarious if it wasn't so contemptible.

[Alfie]

Is possible and plausible per se, there was time, but the surrounding importable events make it unlikely.

Name one surrounding event that makes abduction unlikely.  Also, by "importable" did you mean "improbable", and if so did you not just write this?
"Just because an occurrence is more improbable than another does not mean it couldn't have happened"?

[Alfie]

It would be hilarious if it wasn't so contemptible.

You found it so hilarious it "cheered you up" - an article about potential vantage points of a child abducutor - you've got to admit that's a bit sick.  What is so contemptible about that article?

[faithlilly]

You found it so hilarious it "cheered you up" - an article about potential vantage points of a child abducutor - you've got to admit that's a bit sick.  What is so contemptible about that article?

If you really don't know Alfie then I'm not going to waste my time explain it to you.

[Alfie]

If you really don't know Alfie then I'm not going to waste my time explain it to you.

I know the article doesnt suit your agenda, and also that you seem to get your jollies by ridiculing the idea that Madeleine may have been abducted by a stranger, and also that you are firmly convinced that every article in the MSM that seems to support the idea that the Met are pursuing the abduction angle has been written by the McCanns, but beyond that no, I really don't know what you find so funny. 

[Mr Gray]

The sceptcis have claimed for a long long time that SY have not said that they believe maddie was abducted but they merely believed that an abduction was possible....now they are trying to claim that an abduction was not possible....

that is a perfect example of totally flawed logic....

[John]

I know this is a hot topic but could all posters please moderate their language. TY

[faithlilly]

I know the article doesnt suit your agenda, and also that you seem to get your jollies by ridiculing the idea that Madeleine may have been abducted by a stranger, and also that you are firmly convinced that every article in the MSM that seems to support the idea that the Met are pursuing the abduction angle has been written by the McCanns, but beyond that no, I really don't know what you find so funny.

And while the MSM have done Madeleine and the McCanns such a disservice in the past I'm not at all sure why you're such a big fan.

[Brietta]

The denial of the plausibility or logic of stranger abduction in Madeleine McCann's case as discussed by some on this thread ... in my opinion ... is akin to denying that child abduction by strangers does not happen.
Would that we lived in such enlightened times. 

O tempora o mores! "A British property owner in the resort of Praia Da Luz said the police had pinpointed “persons of interest” to the blocks" http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/kidnapper-spied-madeleine-mccann-police-1897649 is unashamedly and mockingly posted and unashamedly lauded.
Not a thought is given to the investigators who in 2007 failed to investigated ... while the investigators who did investigate in 2013 are derided.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7884.msg377825#msg377825
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7884.msg377832#msg377832

[ShiningInLuz]

To be perfectly blunt, I find this quite objectionable.

I have made it 100% crystal clear that I cannot provide sufficient evidence to support any particular scenario.

I have not explained how a scenario involving some or several of the Tapas 9 is feasible.  Further, I have accepted that other scenarios are possible.

IMO, you have done yourself a disservice with this post.