Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 03, 2017, 07:41:01 PM
This case has similarities to the McCann case. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOZEkcLoeSs
WOW! That is one powerful, heartbreaking video. It ticks practically every box which is pertinent to the McCann case.
Entry with the intent to burglarise ~ the silent child being carried out.
The simulated abduction.
If anyone ever asks about the forty nine questions ... the answer lies right here.
If a polygraph is mentioned ... the answer lies right here.
The lesser charge being the subject of "confession" and how that turned out.
The perpetrator being left to roam and free to offend again because the investigators focused on the parent to the exclusion of all else.
The similarities are uncanny.
Riley Fox's case is a master class for those who insist that Madeleine McCann could not have been abducted.
The similarities are the age of the child and the fact that the police suspected her parent. There are also differences.
One of the first things said is that in cases where a child disappears the first thing to be done is to examine those close to her. In this case they looked at her father because he was the last person to see her.
The PJ did not begin by examining those close to Madeleine. Allegedly because the British diplomats asked them not to.
When their attention did turn to the parents they behaved entirely properly, unlike the policemen in this case. The McCanns had a lawyer present, this father did not.
Who has said Madeleine could not have been abducted? Obviously she could have, but it's also obvious that there are other possibilities.
It was noticeable that the child's father didn't assume abduction immediately. He looked for her then called the police who did exactly the same as the PJ; they searched. This abductor did exactly what this type of offender typically does; he killed the child and disposed of her nearby.
The explanation for 'inconclusive' DNA results was interesting. Apparently that's forensic science speak for 'we don't have the equipment to get a result from this sample'. In this case a private laboratory did have the necessary equipment and were able to find the offender's DNA.