Author Topic: Division of the forensic evidence:  (Read 690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline adam

Division of the forensic evidence:
« on: December 02, 2015, 03:55:22 PM »
Supporters often claim the only forensic evidence against Bamber is the silencer. This is not the case. A poster also recently said on another forum that none of this evidence places Bamber at the scene. This is also not correct.

On this case, everyone has the luxury of knowing there are only two suspects.

The forensic evidence can be divided into three sections -

Evidence placing Bamber at the scene:

The silencer.

The bible landing on top of Sheila's blood.

Sheila's legs being pulled after the second shot.

The 14 reasons why Sheila could not have committed the massacre.


The forensic evidence which points more towards Bamber:

The chambering and loading of the rifle.

Neville's brutal beating.

The bike being taken just before the massacre.

June being shot while in bed and almost certainly asleep.

The twins not waking.

The time Sheila had between the phone call and the police arriving to achieve what she did.

The found hacksaw.

The hacksaw marks on the bathroom window.

No one being able to explain how Sheila committed the massacre to match the crime scene.

Bamber's telephone call to the police.


Forensic evidence showing an opportunity for Bamber:

The lockable from outside kitchen window.

The access into WHF via the bathroom window.

The time. The massacre time was the best opportunity for an execution to be successful.


Most of these points have individual threads. Do other people believe the claim that there is more forensic evidence than just the silencer ?