Crecheman's identity finally revealed

[Brietta]

Rather than be flippant read what I said and then find some evidence of any one else mentioning a direction.

Until it is explained why Dr Totman was walking in what has been accepted by the forum as entirely the wrong direction for a dad returning from picking up a child from the creche ~ in my opinion ~ he cannot be a contender to be the man carrying a child away from both blocks four and five seen by Jane Tanner.

[barrier]

But Andy Redwood thought it was later, did he not?

From the video link I posted to which you have no access,Redwood says it enables them to run the clock from 9:15 to 10pm and its the second sighting of a man walking towards the ocean that was to be their foucus of attention.

[barrier]

Until it is explained why Dr Totman was walking in what has been accepted by the forum as entirely the wrong direction for a dad returning from picking up a child from the creche ~ in my opinion ~ he cannot be a contender to be the man carrying a child away from both blocks four and five seen by Jane Tanner.

The "forum" can accept what it likes,doesn't make it right.
Who established that a child was carried from either blocks 4 or 5?

[Brietta]

Do he or his wife describe how he was carrying his daughter? I don't think they do.

[Brietta]

The "forum" can accept what it likes,doesn't make it right.
Who established that a child was carried from either blocks 4 or 5?

Actually my post should have read "from the direction of".

You appear to be of the opinion that Dr Totman was carrying his daughter home from the creche.  Can you explain how he could have been the man seen by Jane Tanner since he was walking away from his residence and not towards it at the time in question?

[jassi]

That was how Redwood portrayed it, not Trotman.

[Miss Taken Identity]

So , it is fair to say there were 5 people in that vicinity at undefined specific  precise time and one of those removed MBM from the apartment?

 

[Brietta]

That was how Redwood portrayed it, not Trotman.

Who do you think that person portrayed standing in the photograph is?

Snip
"Mystery Briton even posed in clothes he wore that night to prove innocence"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html#ixzz5FTIZSFxX

[jassi]

So , it is fair to say there were 5 people in that vicinity at undefined specific  precise time and one of those removed MBM from the apartment?

 

Not really. She could have been removed at a different time by a different person.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Not really. She could have been removed at a different time by a different person.

Indeed!... it is ridiculous to say 5 people were in that vicinity and no one saw each other apart from JT seening Gerry and erm an 'abductor'

[faithlilly]

Actually my post should have read "from the direction of".

You appear to be of the opinion that Dr Totman was carrying his daughter home from the creche.  Can you explain how he could have been the man seen by Jane Tanner since he was walking away from his residence and not towards it at the time in question?

He was on his way to pick up a pint of milk or to escort his wife home from a friend ?

[Miss Taken Identity]

He was on his way to pick up a pint of milk or to escort his wife home from a friend ?

Yes.

Now these are things I would like to know:
 why did that family come forward- this makes the JT 'Abductor' claim look like an invention. They are also doctors so...why would they lie?

If this doctor was JTs sighting why did he not see the same person JT saw at that time in that place? It isn't rocket science, but no one  has managed to explain this little anomaly  away.

[jassi]

Yes.

Now these are things I would like to know:
 why did that family come forward- this makes the JT 'Abductor' claim look like an invention. They are also doctors so...why would they lie?

If this doctor was JTs sighting why did he not see the same person JT saw at that time in that place? It isn't rocket science, but no one  has managed to explain this little anomaly  away.

That's because to do so, at least on this forum, you would need to think the unthinkable, speak the unspeakable and be deleted and awarded naughty points within minutes of posting it up -IMO

[Robittybob1]

Who do you think that person portrayed standing in the photograph is?

Snip
"Mystery Briton even posed in clothes he wore that night to prove innocence"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html#ixzz5FTIZSFxX

Was that Julian Totman being photographed.   The pyjamas don't look like they were owned by a doctor to me.

[Robittybob1]

Food for thought!