Author Topic: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)  (Read 12181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2013, 09:50:39 PM »
Mrs McCann fingerprints were found on the window in a way that points to an opening movement... >@@(*&)
Mr McCann wasn't brilliant in this one. The broken shutters rumour was the best guarantee for the abduction thesis, but he should have denied it rapidly. The abduction effect wouldn't have suffered of this and they could have then said Mrs McCann in panic forgot she was the one who opened the shutters to look in the car park.
Instead of this, almost 3 years later (and certainly because of Mr Moita Flores' intervention in the injunction trial), Mrs McCann suggested it could have been a red herring !!! What a red herring in fact !
If Madeleine wandered off and was abducted or had an accident, her parents obstructed the police investigation in their obsession to be taken for victims.

Offline ReggieX

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2013, 12:07:19 PM »
Does anyone know when the verdict is due to be given in this case?

Offline imustpointout

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2013, 06:14:07 PM »
Does anyone know when the verdict is due to be given in this case?

I believe it will be given when the case is concluded.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #18 on: November 05, 2013, 06:26:07 PM »
Does anyone know when the verdict is due to be given in this case?

Welcome Reggie! Dont quote me but after the last court sitting on 27 November, IIRC the judge said it would be within a week or a month.....Anne, who has been following the case in Lisbon will probably know for sure....hopefully she will see this and reply when she is on later......

Offline Carana

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #19 on: November 05, 2013, 06:54:21 PM »
Mrs McCann fingerprints were found on the window in a way that points to an opening movement... >@@(*&)

Where on earth did the idea originate that her fingerprints on the window point to having opened the window?

Offline Faithlilly

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #20 on: November 05, 2013, 09:03:21 PM »
From reading the trial transcript ( thank you again Anne for all your hard work ) it seems that Duarte failed to turn up again. Have I got that right ?
Moral Guilt
Detractors of the work of our British Police in bringing criminals to justice generally ignore the important distinction between moral proof and legal evidence of guilt. In not a few cases that are popularly classed with 'unsolved mysteries of crime,' the offender is known, but evidence is wanting. If, for example, in- a recent murder case of special notoriety and interest,* certain human remains had not been found in a cellar, a great crime would have been catalogued among `Police failures'; and yet, even without the evidence which sent the murderer to the gallows, the moral proof of his guilt would have been full and clear.
Robert Anderson

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2013, 09:31:07 AM »
Mrs Duarte was there, Faithlilly, her assistant wasn't.

Offline Victoria

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2013, 09:33:12 AM »
From reading the trial transcript ( thank you again Anne for all your hard work ) it seems that Duarte failed to turn up again. Have I got that right ?

The only people missing were Amaral's witnesses. Funny, isn't it, when push comes to shove nobody's  in any rush to stick their neck out for him.

Offline C.Edwards

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2013, 11:58:54 AM »
The only people missing were Amaral's witnesses. Funny, isn't it, when push comes to shove nobody's  in any rush to stick their neck out for him.

Is this all that's left to you?  Attempting to score points in some bizarre way by trying to convince yourself that Amaral's witnesses are in some way deserting him?  They can't NOT appear unless dismissed by the judge as unneeded/unwanted (like Kate McCann's mum was).  Do you inhabit some bizarre parallel universe in which the McCanns are coming out of this libel trial with any credit whatsoever?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #24 on: November 06, 2013, 12:19:21 PM »
The only people missing were Amaral's witnesses. Funny, isn't it, when push comes to shove nobody's  in any rush to stick their neck out for him.

Yes, I noticed the T7 all rushed to the aid of their friends during the trial didn't they.

Offline Aletheias footsteps

Re: McCann v Gonšalo Amaral Libel Trial in Lisbon - Day 7 (5 witnesses)
« Reply #25 on: November 06, 2013, 11:57:22 PM »
Can someone point me to anywhere that gives details of proceedings on 5th November, because as far as I am aware there have not been any posted as yet.

I ask because there seems to be some confusion (well I'm confused by it  8(0(* ) .... as the 5th November was Day 8 of the hearing, not Day 7. 

Moites Flores appeared as witness number five on Day 7, which was 8th October. This is as posted by Anne Guedes (thanks and blessings to her for all her hard work) and Textusa.

http://mccannvamarallibeltrial.blogspot.pt/