So to be clear, Amaral has lied:
That Mark Harrison turned the investigation into one for a little girl assumed dead when Mark Harrison did no such thing
That Mark Harrison said Madeleine's body was buried in close proximity to PdL when Harrison, explicitly ruled out burial
That Amaral contradicted and corrected Prior on interpretation of the forensic results when Amaral's own misunderstanding of forensics is incompetent.
That Stuart Prior rang the FSS to berate them on the subject of the PJ's powers of arrest (when Prior, almost certainly, did no such thing)
That Eddie 'scented death' all over the place when both Harrison and Grime made plain that no incriminating inferences could be drawn from dog alerts.
That the McCanns launched a fraudulent appeal in their (dead) daughter's name when the accounts are in apple-pie order, and there is still no clue of what happened to Madeleine.
All that and more ....
Yet Amaral will be allowed to appeal?
On what grounds?
I find that your points would be perfectly valid in a UK libel trial - and may well explain why no established UK publisher would have ever touched the book / docu drama with a barge pole.
I agree with you that numerous details aren't substantiated in the files and - to be generous - that he has a garbled understanding of much of what
was in the files.
And even what
is in the files had never been tested in a criminal trial prosecuting the former arguidos.
However... the judge ruled (as did the appeals court in Murat's case) that establishing the "truth" of the "facts" wasn't the remit of the civil court in the trials in question.
This appears to be a blanket judgement covering the whole issue of "truth": questioning the veracity of the "facts" in the files, the "information" received via hearsay and the "interpretation" of said "information" would stray beyond the remit - which appears to be about relative rights.
The judge bypassed all of that by referring to the AG's assessment, based on all of the files, which came to a different conclusion.