Author Topic: Gonçalo Amaral confirms he will appeal the damages decision to higher Court.  (Read 853037 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
I was just looking at that.

Appeal submitted.

By the McCanns ....

You do understand what the site said, don't you ?

Offline Angelo222

PROJECTO JUSTIÇA GONÇALO AMARAL

Update: Appeal filed
15 June 2015

Gonçalo Amaral's appeal in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family has been filed this morning.

Thank you to each and every one of you that has shown support for Mr Amaral. There are no words to adequately express our gratitude.

 We will keep you updated on any developments.

 Thank you so very much.

www.pjga.blogspot.nl/2015/06/update-appeal-filed.html
« Last Edit: June 15, 2015, 01:08:11 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

ferryman

  • Guest
You do understand what the site said, don't you ?

Gonçalo Amaral's appeal in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family has been filed this morning.

I know what is says.

It says that the McCanns have appealed against Amaral.

And it seems they were allowed to submit their appeal late.

Was it meant to say something different?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Gonçalo Amaral's appeal in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family has been filed this morning.

I know what is says.

It says that the McCanns have appealed against Amaral.

And it seems they were allowed to submit their appeal late.

Was it meant to say something different?

Oh dear.

Read again.

ferryman

  • Guest
Gonçalo Amaral's appeal in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family has been filed this morning.

I know what is says.

It says that the McCanns have appealed against Amaral.

And it seems they were allowed to submit their appeal late.

Was it meant to say something different?

ETA: I suppose the McCanns could be challenging the finding that Amaral's book did not harm the search for Madeleine ....

stephen25000

  • Guest
Gonçalo Amaral's appeal in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family has been filed this morning.

I know what is says.

It says that the McCanns have appealed against Amaral.

And it seems they were allowed to submit their appeal late.

Was it meant to say something different?

It doesn't say that ferryman.

Offline G-Unit

ETA: I suppose the McCanns could be challenging the finding that Amaral's book did not harm the search for Madeleine ....

No. The McCanns have filed nothing. Lets rearrange the sentence.

Gonçalo Amaral's appeal (in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family) has been filed this morning.

The important information is in bold. The information in brackets is just a description of what the appeal is about.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Oh dear.

Read again.
It is poorly worded, rather like her translations of the PJ files.
Cue another 6 months of silence as the wheels of Portuguese justice trundle slowly through the upper echelons.
Meanwhile, kerching, kerching.

stephen25000

  • Guest
No. The McCanns have filed nothing. Lets rearrange the sentence.

Gonçalo Amaral's appeal (in the civil case that has been presented against him by the McCann family) has been filed this morning.

The important information is in bold. The information in brackets is just a description of what the appeal is about.

You might need to type that in a larger font. @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

stephen25000

  • Guest
It is poorly worded, rather like her translations of the PJ files.
Cue another 6 months of silence as the wheels of Portuguese justice trundle slowly through the upper echelons.
Meanwhile, kerching, kerching.

It is poorly worded, I agree, but the meaning is clear.

ferryman

  • Guest
You might need to type that in a larger font. @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

So now we've got syntax out of the way, where is there independent corroboration that Amaral's grounds of appeal have been accepted?

And why was he allowed to submit after the deadline for appeals?

ETA: The other point that's not clear is whether his submission has been accepted, or whether it is still under consideration.

If it was filed (late!) this morning, then it is presumably still under consideration ....
« Last Edit: June 15, 2015, 01:24:13 PM by ferryman »

stephen25000

  • Guest
So now we've got syntax out of the way, where is there independent corroboration that Amaral's grounds of appeal have been accepted?

And why was he allowed to submit after the deadline for appeals?

Wait and see.

Enjoy the anticipation. 8)--))

Offline Jean-Pierre

It is poorly worded, rather like her translations of the PJ files.
Cue another 6 months of silence as the wheels of Portuguese justice trundle slowly through the upper echelons.
Meanwhile, kerching, kerching.

Come now, Misty.  Lawyers gotta eat....

Offline G-Unit

It is poorly worded, rather like her translations of the PJ files.
Cue another 6 months of silence as the wheels of Portuguese justice trundle slowly through the upper echelons.
Meanwhile, kerching, kerching.

The McCanns have certainly done their bit towards keeping the legal profession in Portugal employed.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

stephen25000

  • Guest
Come now, Misty.  Lawyers gotta eat....

and that JP is why they love this case.

On and on and on................