Author Topic: Gonçalo Amaral confirms he will appeal the damages decision to higher Court.  (Read 853399 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline misty


Offline Anna

Please stick to the subject under discussion and refrain from disrupting the thread
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline pegasus

Compare for accuracy, informativeness, and transparency
http://www.findmadeleine.com/about_the_campaign/
http://pjga.blogspot.pt/2015/06/a-note-of-gratitude.html
BTW £30000 tonight maybe?
« Last Edit: June 15, 2015, 07:27:46 PM by pegasus »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Compare for accuracy, informativeness, and transparency
http://www.findmadeleine.com/about_the_campaign/
http://pjga.blogspot.pt/2015/06/a-note-of-gratitude.html
BTW £30000 tonight maybe?
How much has been spent on filing the appeal?

ferryman

  • Guest
You can be assured that Gonçalo Amaral is appealing against much more than the amount of damages.

In view of the manifest and proven lies Amaral has told, why do you suppose he should be appealing anything at all?

Let's see ...

Mark Harrison changed the investigation to one for a little girl assumed dead

(Oh no he didn't).

Mark Harrison concluded Madeleine was buried in close vicinity to apartment 5a

(Mark Harrison tentatively suggested that if she was dead, Madeleine's remains were most likely jettisoned into the sea).

Kate sacked a Leicestershire police liaison officer (where's the evidence)?

Eddie 'smelt death' all over the place.  Neither Grime nor Harrison said that.

Amaral contradicted and corrected Prior on interpretation of the forensic results.  We can safely assume that's a lie.

Prior rang the FSS to berate them on the PJ's power's of arrest (lie!)

The FSS produced a preliminary report (no they didn't).

STU 100 would have confirmed Madeleine was dead but was blocked by customs (the STU100 is for trapping and storing scents of living people suspected of crimes).

And so the catalogue of lies rolls.

And yet you think Amaral has a substantial basis for appeal?

Why is that?

Offline Carana

You can be assured that Gonçalo Amaral is appealing against much more than the amount of damages.

Do you think he can bring up the subject of why "truth" was set aside? If so, that could be interesting...


stephen25000

  • Guest
In view of the manifest and proven lies Amaral has told, why do you suppose he should be appealing anything at all?

Let's see ...

Mark Harrison changed the investigation to one for a little girl assumed dead

(Oh no he didn't).

Mark Harrison concluded Madeleine was buried in close vicinity to apartment 5a

(Mark Harrison tentatively suggested that if she was dead, Madeleine's remains were most likely jettisoned into the sea).

Kate sacked a Leicestershire police liaison officer (where's the evidence)?

Eddie 'smelt death' all over the place.  Neither Grime nor Harrison said that.

Amaral contradicted and corrected Prior on interpretation of the forensic results.  We can safely assume that's a lie.

Prior rang the FSS to berate them on the PJ's power's of arrest (lie!)

The FSS produced a preliminary report (no they didn't).

STU 100 would have confirmed Madeleine was dead but was blocked by customs (the STU100 is for trapping and storing scents of living people suspected of crimes).

And so the catalogue of lies rolls.

And yet you think Amaral has a substantial basis for appeal?

Why is that?

You're so desperate ferryman.

When it comes to insight on the case , your abilities were highlighted today when you thought it was the mccanns appealing. 8**8:/:

Offline Carana

In view of the manifest and proven lies Amaral has told, why do you suppose he should be appealing anything at all?

Let's see ...

Mark Harrison changed the investigation to one for a little girl assumed dead

(Oh no he didn't).

Mark Harrison concluded Madeleine was buried in close vicinity to apartment 5a

(Mark Harrison tentatively suggested that if she was dead, Madeleine's remains were most likely jettisoned into the sea).

Kate sacked a Leicestershire police liaison officer (where's the evidence)?

Eddie 'smelt death' all over the place.  Neither Grime nor Harrison said that.

Amaral contradicted and corrected Prior on interpretation of the forensic results.  We can safely assume that's a lie.

Prior rang the FSS to berate them on the PJ's power's of arrest (lie!)

The FSS produced a preliminary report (no they didn't).

STU 100 would have confirmed Madeleine was dead but was blocked by customs (the STU100 is for trapping and storing scents of living people suspected of crimes).

And so the catalogue of lies rolls.

And yet you think Amaral has a substantial basis for appeal?

Why is that?

Establishing the "Truth" was set aside, FM.

Unless, of course, Amaral aims to raise it as an issue...

Offline pegasus

How much has been spent on filing the appeal?
That won't have been billed yet.
At least we know exactly who is paying Mr Amaral's legal costs.
Remind us please, who is paying his 5 opponents' legal costs?
How easy that should be to answer - but it's not, is it?

ferryman

  • Guest
Establishing the "Truth" was set aside, FM.

Unless, of course, Amaral aims to raise it as an issue...

Depends how much store you set in Anne Guide's reports, I guess.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Depends how much store you set in Anne Guide's reports, I guess.

Well on what most people have said, she is very reliable and does not show bias.

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
...



Isn't that just "Proof of delivery of pleading" Pegasus?
« Last Edit: June 15, 2015, 07:55:32 PM by DCI »
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

ferryman

  • Guest
Well on what most people have said, she is very reliable and does not show bias.

According to Anne Guides, Kate's counsellor presented himself as a psychiatrist.

I don't actually believe it; nor that there was ever any question mark over his testimony.

Offline pegasus

Isn't that just "Proof of delivery of pleading" Pegasus?
Yes, it is issued by the court

Offline Carana

Depends how much store you set in Anne Guide's reports, I guess.

The ruling is also online in Portuguese.

The judge set aside the whole issue of establishing whether anything could be considered to be true simply because it appeared in the police files, as it was not within her remit to do so.

Someone has a sense of irony: 

Truth is also simple. It is truth that guides me, and it will continue to do so, in its simplicity and greatness.

Of course it would be, except in cases in which establishing the truth is deliberately set aside.

I really don't think that it's in his best interest to wade into that territory, but who knows...