Gonçalo Amaral confirms he will appeal the damages decision to higher Court.

[ferryman]

his thesis was based on lies

It was.

Amaral didn't even know (or, more likely, chose to try to deceive people into believing otherwise!) that the enquiry was a murder enquiry.

That the enquiry was a murder enquiry is explicit from Mark Harrison's reports.

It is also explicit from Mark Harrison's reports that he was instructed by the PJ to investigate that Madeleine had been murdered.

Yet, according to Amaral, Harrison switched the enquiry into one for a little girl assumed dead.

And according to Amaral, no one talked about murder.

All lies.

And all reasons why Amaral will lose his appeal (if one has been lodged).

[ferryman]

Hypocrite.

What have the mccanns and their cohorts being doing for the last 8 plus years

Searching for Madeleine.

And I hope the board abuse will be punished.

[Mr Gray]

It was.

Amaral didn't even know (or, more likely, chose to try to deceive people into believing otherwise!) that the enquiry was a murder enquiry.

That the enquiry was a murder enquiry is explicit from Mark Harrison's reports.

It is also explicit from Mark Harrison's reports that he was instructed by the PJ to investigate that Madeleine had been murdered.

Yet, according to Amaral, Harrison switched the enquiry into one for a little girl assumed dead.

And according to Amaral, no one talked about murder.

All lies.

And all reasons why Amaral will lose his appeal (if one has been lodged).

This is why I believe the appeal is against the sentence....the amount of damages. That might also explain why the funding appeal has been wound down.....if the second court agrees with the damages I can't see amaral can take the case any further....the ECHR would not rule on the level of damages

[stephen25000]

Searching for Madeleine.

And I hope the board abuse will be punished.

So you've been searching have you ferryman ?

On a keyboard, by chance ?

and don't think for one moment, people can't see through the propaganda on the mccanns behalf.

[stephen25000]

It was.

Amaral didn't even know (or, more likely, chose to try to deceive people into believing otherwise!) that the enquiry was a murder enquiry.

That the enquiry was a murder enquiry is explicit from Mark Harrison's reports.

It is also explicit from Mark Harrison's reports that he was instructed by the PJ to investigate that Madeleine had been murdered.

Yet, according to Amaral, Harrison switched the enquiry into one for a little girl assumed dead.

And according to Amaral, no one talked about murder.

All lies.

And all reasons why Amaral will lose his appeal (if one has been lodged).

Dear oh dear. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

[ferryman]

Dear oh dear. &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

This report considers solely the possibility that Madeleine McCann has been murdered and her body is concealed within the areas previously searched by Police in Zone 1 around Praia Da Luz. Other scenarios or possibilities may on request be considered and be subject of a further report.

(Mark Harrison)

[stephen25000]

This report considers solely the possibility that Madeleine McCann has been murdered and her body is concealed within the areas previously searched by Police in Zone 1 around Praia Da Luz. Other scenarios or possibilities may on request be considered and be subject of a further report.

(Mark Harrison)

May I remind you ferryman, the crime remains unknown, just as it was then.

No matter how you try to perpeyuate THE STORY OF ABDUCTION,k it remains unknown, and the original team COULD NOT FIND EVIDENCE OF ABDUCTION.

No change on that either.

[ferryman]

May I remind you ferryman, the crime remains unknown, just as it was then.

No matter how you try to perpeyuate THE STORY OF ABDUCTION,k it remains unknown, and the original team COULD NOT FIND EVIDENCE OF ABDUCTION.

No change on that either.

Which part of the fact that Mark Harrison was instructed by the PJ to investigate that Madeleine had been murdered are you erroneously quibbling about, and why?

Do you dispute the fact that Harrison, himself, reached no definitive conclusion about what happened to Madeleine?

[stephen25000]

Which part of the fact that Mark Harrison was instructed by the PJ to investigate that Madeleine had been murdered are you erroneously quibbling about, and why?

Do you dispute the fact that Harrison, himself, reached no definitive conclusion about what happened to Madeleine?

What part do you not understand ferryman ?

The crime remains 'unknown'.


Meanwhile, what searching have you done for Madeleine ?

[pathfinder73]

Which part of the fact that Mark Harrison was instructed by the PJ to investigate that Madeleine had been murdered are you erroneously quibbling about, and why?

Do you dispute the fact that Harrison, himself, reached no definitive conclusion about what happened to Madeleine?

So they were searching on the beach for a murdered child. So what? She could have been murdered.

[ferryman]

So they were searching on the beach for a murdered child. So what? She could have been murdered.

The so what is that Amaral lied that no one talked out about murder

And (more seriously) he lied that Harrison turned the investigation into one for a little girl assumed dead.

Harrison did no such thing (on either count).

[stephen25000]

The so what is that Amaral lied that no one talked out about murder

And (more seriously) he lied that Harrison turned the investigation into one for a little girl assumed dead.

Harrison did no such thing (on either count).

This thread is about Amaral's appeal.

and all you want to do is attack him for patently obvious reasons.

[ferryman]

This thread is about Amaral's appeal.

and all you want to do is attack him for patently obvious reasons.

And your problem with my explanation of why Amaral is likely to lose his appeal is, what?

[Mr Moderator]

Sensible posts please.

MM

[stephen25000]

And your problem with my explanation of why Amaral is likely to lose his appeal is, what?

Leave that to the court.