Author Topic: McCanns application to have Supreme Court judgement annulled dismissed.  (Read 1493 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

The Supreme Court in Portugal have dismissed the McCann's application for an annulment of their earlier decision.

From the Court website:

Supremo Tribunal de Justiça [Supreme Court of Justice]
Descritivo: [description]
Tabela da Sessão de 21-03-2017 10:00 [ table/chart of the sitting/session on 21 March 2017 at 10.00am]
(1ª SECÇÃO) [[section 1]

Recorrente [applicant] : Kate Marie Healy Mccann
Recorrente: Gerald Patrick Mccann
Recorrido: [applied against] Gonçalo Sousa Amaral
Recorrido: Editora Guerra e Paz-Lda

decisão = [decision]
Indeferida = [dismissed]



http://www.stj.pt/ficheiros/tabelas/Decididas/Civeis/1s-2017-03-21.pdf

216
« Last Edit: April 30, 2017, 05:55:25 PM by John »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline jassi

just seen elsewhere

http://www.stj.pt/ficheiros/tabelas/Decididas/Civeis/1s-2017-03-21.pdf

Appears that the SC has given their decision - rejected

(bottom of second page)
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -  10 years and still no solution.

Offline Alice Purjorick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6590
  • Total likes: 2640
  • One man's style must not be the rule of another's.
I tell you it's Burt Reynolds

Online stephen25000

Interesting!

Well that was totally unexpected.
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline Alice Purjorick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6590
  • Total likes: 2640
  • One man's style must not be the rule of another's.
Well that was totally unexpected.

That's because us hoi polloi is too fik to spot the masterplan. This was merely a tactical withdrawal prompted by the poor standard of the Portuguese judiciary system.
"You wait til........................"
I tell you it's Burt Reynolds

Online Robittybob1

just seen elsewhere

http://www.stj.pt/ficheiros/tabelas/Decididas/Civeis/1s-2017-03-21.pdf

Appears that the SC has given their decision - rejected

(bottom of second page)
Does the case number match the annulment process?  1454/09.5TVLSB.L1.S1  is the number on the spreadsheet. 
Case No. 1.454 / 09.5TVLSB.L1.S1 from the OP  That might just be the original case file number originating from the process started in 2009?
« Last Edit: March 21, 2017, 06:12:57 PM by Robittybob1 »
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline Alice Purjorick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6590
  • Total likes: 2640
  • One man's style must not be the rule of another's.
Does the case number match the annulment process?  1454/09.5TVLSB.L1.S1  is the number on the spreadsheet. 
Case No. 1.454 / 09.5TVLSB.L1.S1 from the OP  That might just be the original case file number originating from the process started in 2009?

How many cases involving Kate Marie Healy, Gerald Patrick McCann and Goncalo Amaral do believe are to be heard by the SC on 21.03.2017?
The complaint is was the only one outstanding
I tell you it's Burt Reynolds

Online Robittybob1

How many cases involving Kate Marie Healy, Gerald Patrick McCann and Goncalo Amaral do believe are to be heard by the SC on 21.03.2017?
The complaint is was the only one outstanding
There could have been more than one attempt at introducing the complaint and the maybe the first one was rejected.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?

Offline barrier

There could have been more than one attempt at introducing the complaint and the maybe the first one was rejected.

Straws and clutching.


Online stephen25000

There could have befen more than one attempt at introducing the complaint and the maybe the first one was rejected.

Really ?

Where did you get that idea from.

It was the last chance saloon.
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline misty

Re: McCanns application to have Supreme Court judgement annulled dismissed.
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2017, 06:39:11 PM »
Really ?

Where did you get that idea from.

It was the last chance saloon.

Um....there's still the ECHR....by which time the investigation may well have produced some...unexpected....results.

Online stephen25000

Re: McCanns application to have Supreme Court judgement annulled dismissed.
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2017, 06:42:19 PM »
Um....there's still the ECHR....by which time the investigation may well have produced some...unexpected....results.

A long backlog in cases in the ECHR.

As to the investigation........
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline davel

Re: McCanns application to have Supreme Court judgement annulled dismissed.
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2017, 06:56:13 PM »
A long backlog in cases in the ECHR.

As to the investigation........

There's no rush
I would like to see the McCanns more proactive in silencing their critics in the uk and answering them
Hopefully we will now see both



Online stephen25000

Re: McCanns application to have Supreme Court judgement annulled dismissed.
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2017, 07:12:09 PM »
Time for the Mccanns to pay up.

No more delays.


Probability of success, even getting their case heard with the E.C.H.R. , minimal.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2017, 07:38:50 PM by stephen25000 »
The McCanns were solely responsible for their childcare arrangements and there is no one else to blame.

S and S, two more amateurs making money from a disappeared child, and clearly without a clue.

Offline Alice Purjorick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6590
  • Total likes: 2640
  • One man's style must not be the rule of another's.
Re: McCanns application to have Supreme Court judgement annulled dismissed.
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2017, 07:12:49 PM »
There could have been more than one attempt at introducing the complaint and the maybe the first one was rejected.
Yeah! right Nobby riiiiight.
I tell you it's Burt Reynolds